Go Back   CDN Business Directory > Main Category > Taxes

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-12-2007, 04:06 AM
L K Williams
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Mimimizing the AMT by Claiming Fewer Deductions

frank1492 <frank1492[at]verizon.net> wrote:

snip
- quote -

> I realize that computation of AMT is complex and you don't
> have exact figures, but I'm just looking for a rule of thumb
> as well as perhaps some consolation that I haven't paid much
> more than I needed to.


As a general rule, if you become subject to the AMT, there
is little you can do to reduce the TOTAL tax bill. If you
limit deductions, you will have a higher regular tax and a
lower AMT. However, it is usually a dollar for dollar
exchange. For each dollar you increase preference items,
you increace the AMT by an equal amount.

That's exactly what the AMT was intended to do: to insure
that taxpayers either pay a certain amount of regular tax or
become subject to the AMT.

Lanny K. Williams, CPA
Nawarat, Williams & Co., Ltd.
Income Tax Services for Expatriate Americans

<< ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- >
 
Old 04-12-2007, 04:06 AM
Bill Brown
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Mimimizing the AMT by Claiming Fewer Deductions

frank1492 <frank1...[at]verizon.net> wrote:

- quote -

> This issue has been raised in other threads, but I'm not

<<SNIP> > I realize that computation of AMT is complex and you don't
- quote -

> have exact figures, but I'm just looking for a rule of thumb
> as well as perhaps some consolation that I haven't paid much
> more than I needed to.


Here's a rule of thumb for those impacted by AMT. Nothing
you can do will lower your total tax liability. If you
eliminate enough deductions so that AMT is zero, your
regular tax will have increased to the point that it equals
or exceeds what your liability would have been with that AMT
impact.

<< ------------------------------------------------------- > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ------------------------------------------------------- >
  #-1  
Old 04-09-2007, 07:10 AM
frank1492
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Mimimizing the AMT by Claiming Fewer Deductions

This issue has been raised in other threads, but I'm not
sure I have ever seen exact answers to the following
questions.

For the past two years my income has been unusually large,
due to the sale of shorefront property in a state other than
my home state. Obviously this had tax ramifications in both
states. Being somewhat naive, I went ahead and listed the
large taxes as deductions. My AMT was several thousand
dollars in each year. (None next year I presume as my
income and property taxes return to "normal" levels.) I
have already filed my tax return for this year, and
obviously last as well.

I focus first on whether or not the law says (or implies)
that once you have chosen to itemize, you then have an
obligation to itemize fully. So my first question is: Do
you? (Although I gather not.)

If possible, for example, to understate state taxes, my next
question is under what circumstances would benefit to the
AMT accrue? I currently have a refund of $301. As an
extreme test, using TurboTax, I reduced my state taxes to
zero to see what would happen. The result was an amount due
of over $1300. (My AMT of course went to 0.) Obviously
there was no benefit to completely omit my state taxes as
deductions, which again I would have guessed.

If I looked at various levels of understatement, however,
would there have been some level at which there would have
been benefit to such understatement? If understatement is
allowable, would there have been great benefit to finding
that "critical level" that would have minimized my total
tax? Or would that benefit have been relatively small?

I realize that computation of AMT is complex and you don't
have exact figures, but I'm just looking for a rule of thumb
as well as perhaps some consolation that I haven't paid much
more than I needed to.

Thanks very much for your help!

Frank

<< ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== >
 

Tags
amt, claiming, deductions, fewer, mimimizing
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
Chapter 179 Deductions -large SUV/Truck deductions for business owners
MAX: Does any one have any information on this? Is it an Audit alert? Thanks. << -------------------------------------------------><< The Charter...
Taxes 17 06-17-2004 03:53 AM
Claiming exemption
JSmith9543: My ex and I are divorced. He currently is allowed to claim our daughter per divorce decree, and I claim our son. Decree states ex may claim 'minor...
Taxes 1 04-23-2004 04:37 AM
Claiming dependent
Nan Eklund: Client has custody of daughter, age 20, full time student. Divorce several years ago and court gave dependency deduction to father. Father stopped...
Taxes 2 02-12-2004 08:29 AM
claiming dependants
Kelly and Robert: Does anyone have a link or information regarding the claiming of children.. If a child is born after June 1, can they still be claimed as a...
Taxes 14 12-28-2003 11:37 PM



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:12 PM.