Go Back   CDN Business Directory > Main Category > Taxes

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 03-31-2007, 03:25 AM
Drew Edmundson
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Schedule M-3 for 1065

"Mike20878" <mrosen[at]gmail.com> wrote:

- quote -

> I have a partnership that meets the new requirement to file
> schedule M-3 this year. We are running into a problem
> determining how we will track tax basis going forward if we
> are forced to convert partner capital to book basis to
> reconcile to the M-3. It's my understanding that schedule
> M-2 line 3 should equal the audited book income, whereas in
> the past we used a tax basis balance sheet and book income
> (simply taxable income less nondeductibles). Is it
> permissible to continue to do this for the M-2 and reconcile
> the difference to schedule L with a statement? The
> instructions for the M-2 say that a partnership "may, but is
> not required to, use the rules in Regulations section
> 1.704-1(b) (2)(iv) to determine the partners'' capital
> accounts... If the beginning and ending capital accounts
> reported under these rules differ from the amounts reported
> on Schedule L, attach a statement reconciling any
> differences." Does anyone have a summary of this
> regulation? I looked it up but I don't completely follow
> what it says.
> Put another way, do we have to report the audited balance
> sheet or can we continue to use a tax basis balance sheet
> and still reconcile audited income on the M-3? Is it
> permissible for M-2 line 3 net income to differ from M-3,
> Part I, Line 11? The reconciliation statement of schedule L
> partners' capital to M-2 should explain the difference.


Wow, your partners' capital accounts match their basis? I
don't have any partnerships where that is the case. I track
the tax basis separately. The same way you do for clients'
who own partnership interest where you don't prepare the
partnership's return.

--
Drew Edmundson, CPA
Cary, NC

<< ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== >
  #-1  
Old 03-30-2007, 08:35 AM
Mike20878
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Schedule M-3 for 1065

I have a partnership that meets the new requirement to file
schedule M-3 this year. We are running into a problem
determining how we will track tax basis going forward if we
are forced to convert partner capital to book basis to
reconcile to the M-3. It's my understanding that schedule
M-2 line 3 should equal the audited book income, whereas in
the past we used a tax basis balance sheet and book income
(simply taxable income less nondeductibles). Is it
permissible to continue to do this for the M-2 and reconcile
the difference to schedule L with a statement? The
instructions for the M-2 say that a partnership "may, but is
not required to, use the rules in Regulations section
1.704-1(b) (2)(iv) to determine the partners'' capital
accounts... If the beginning and ending capital accounts
reported under these rules differ from the amounts reported
on Schedule L, attach a statement reconciling any
differences." Does anyone have a summary of this
regulation? I looked it up but I don't completely follow
what it says.

Put another way, do we have to report the audited balance
sheet or can we continue to use a tax basis balance sheet
and still reconcile audited income on the M-3? Is it
permissible for M-2 line 3 net income to differ from M-3,
Part I, Line 11? The reconciliation statement of schedule L
partners' capital to M-2 should explain the difference.

Is anyone encountering this and/or using RIA GoSystem Tax
RS?

Thanks.

<< ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== >
 

Tags
1065, schedule
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
EFile vs. Really long Schedule D or Attached Schedule
Jo Firey: OK I'll admit I haven't been paying attention. (I did try to google to get the answer) What is the current consensus of a return that has so...
Taxes 5 04-12-2004 09:35 AM
1065/Generic schedule question
John E. Jones: I am trying to fill out a 1065 plus the K-1 schedules this year. I understand them OK, and they seems fairly straight forward. However,...
Taxes 1 01-25-2004 05:23 AM



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:58 PM.