|
#1
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > 2. Without any other information, I am assuming the
Basically, there's no generally reasonable estimate.> > depreciable (house) portion of the property is two-thirds of > > the total, with the undepreciable land being the remaining > > one-third. Is that a reasonable estimate? > 2. I have heard an 80% house 20%land is sometimes used. In some places, the land is worth 105% of the total (people buy houses to knock them down and build new houses, so the land is worth the total plus the cost of knocking down the old house). Seth << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| | |||
| |||
| "R. Pile" <michael.br...[at]wdn.com> wrote: - quote - > This question involves a rental property purchased by
1. His basis in 2006 is his original basis on his portion of> brother and sister in 1981. Brother (my client) filed MFJ > with his wife, claiming his half of depreciation expenses; > sister filed her own tax return, claimimg her half of > depreciation expenses. Sister died in 1995 when house was > re-appraised. Brother inherited her half of rental property > and a stepped-up basis. Brother sold house in 2006. > 1. Normally, for the capital gains computation, the basis is > reduced by depreciation "allowed or allowable." Now that > the house has been sold, does brother reduce the basis by > the total amount of depreciation claimed by both he and his > sister separately or just the amount of depreciation claimed > on his own tax returns from 1981-1995? > 2. Without any other information, I am assuming the > depreciable (house) portion of the property is two-thirds of > the total, with the undepreciable land being the remaining > one-third. Is that a reasonable estimate? > 3. In 1981, was this 15 year real property ACRS > depreciation? the property reduced by his allowable depreciation from 1981-2006 plus the 1995 FMV of the portion inherited reduced by his allowable depreciation on that portion from 1995-2006. 2. I have heard an 80% house 20%land is sometimes used. 3. Don't know << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| This question involves a rental property purchased by brother and sister in 1981. Brother (my client) filed MFJ with his wife, claiming his half of depreciation expenses; sister filed her own tax return, claimimg her half of depreciation expenses. Sister died in 1995 when house was re-appraised. Brother inherited her half of rental property and a stepped-up basis. Brother sold house in 2006. 1. Normally, for the capital gains computation, the basis is reduced by depreciation "allowed or allowable." Now that the house has been sold, does brother reduce the basis by the total amount of depreciation claimed by both he and his sister separately or just the amount of depreciation claimed on his own tax returns from 1981-1995? 2. Without any other information, I am assuming the depreciable (house) portion of the property is two-thirds of the total, with the undepreciable land being the remaining one-third. Is that a reasonable estimate? 3. In 1981, was this 15 year real property ACRS depreciation? Thank you. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| Tags |
| coowner, deceased, depreciation, rental, w or |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Another Rental Depreciation Pilgrim: I own a rental that I through out the last few years have not had rented all twelve months of the year. The first question is can or should I claim... | Taxes | 1 | 03-30-2006 09:40 AM | |
| Rental depreciation L K Williams: I'm curious if anybody has had a similar situation: My clients have a situation I have never had to deal with before. The husband is a US citizen... | Taxes | 1 | 03-23-2006 05:58 AM | |
| Rental depreciation LB: preparing for 04 tax return with home sale and Rental depreciation I have owned and lived in a house for 4 years, then rented it out January 1... | Taxes | 2 | 11-06-2004 11:00 PM | |
| depreciation - rental Jim: After you have fully depreciated your rental proporty(5 year), is there any way to continue depreciating. Thank you in advance for any information... | Taxes | 6 | 07-23-2004 02:38 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |