| |||||||
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "raylopez99" <raylopez99[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > Here's a tricky question: once you, a US citizen, establish
The 30-day rule does not apply to a taxpayer who qualifies> yourself as a foreign bona fide resident (say you've lived > in a foreign country and met all the requirements, for the > last 10 years), can you take a vacation in the USA for more > than 30 days, say 6 weeks? IRS Publication 54 and my > literal reading of it says "yes". Take a look at example 1 > on page 14. > But the IRS, as is typical of a bureaucracy, tries to stick > as close to the 30 day rule as they can (which is part of > the 330 day out of 365 day rule, which is different from the > bona fide foreign resident rule). As per the example > above--they literally said 30 days in that example. It > would have been more helpful if the example was for 45 days. > What do you think? If it's close, just say so. If > challenged by the IRS I will cite the literal language (I > plan on taking a 45 day vacation in the US this year, and am > a bona fide foreign expat from the US). as a bona fide resident. Each of these rules is separately stated in the law and the regulations and the bona fide rule contains no language about the 30-day requirement. I have been preparing returns for expats for many, many years. I have always told my clients that qualifying under the bona fide rules has a number of advantages. One of the major benefits of claiming bona fide residence is that you do not have to count your days in the US. It is not unusual for business people stationed in a foreign country to have to make multiple trips to their home offices, etc. in the US. Often, the total number of days will exceed 30 days. This may reduce the amount of the exclusion that can be claimed but it does not affect the eligibility for the exclusion. I've never heard of the IRS challenging a taxpayer on this issue. Lanny K. Williams, CPA Nawarat, Williams & Co., Ltd. Income Tax Services for Expatriate Americans << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| | |||
| |||
| "raylopez99" <raylopez99[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > Here's a tricky question: once you, a US citizen, establish
The 30-day rule does not apply to a taxpayer who qualifies> yourself as a foreign bona fide resident (say you've lived > in a foreign country and met all the requirements, for the > last 10 years), can you take a vacation in the USA for more > than 30 days, say 6 weeks? IRS Publication 54 and my > literal reading of it says "yes". Take a look at example 1 > on page 14. > But the IRS, as is typical of a bureaucracy, tries to stick > as close to the 30 day rule as they can (which is part of > the 330 day out of 365 day rule, which is different from the > bona fide foreign resident rule). As per the example > above--they literally said 30 days in that example. It > would have been more helpful if the example was for 45 days. > What do you think? If it's close, just say so. If > challenged by the IRS I will cite the literal language (I > plan on taking a 45 day vacation in the US this year, and am > a bona fide foreign expat from the US). as a bona fide resident. Each of these rules is separately stated in the law and the regulations and the bona fide rule contains no language about the 30-day requirement. I have been preparing returns for expats for many, many years. I have always told my clients that qualifying under the bona fide rules has a number of advantages. One of the major benefits of claiming bona fide residence is that you do not have to count your days in the US. It is not unusual for business people stationed in a foreign country to have to make multiple trips to their home offices, etc. in the US. Often, the total number of days will exceed 30 days. This may reduce the amount of the exclusion that can be claimed but it does not affect the eligibility for the exclusion. I've never heard of IRS challenging a taxpayer on this issue. Lanny K. Williams, CPA Nawarat, Williams & Co., Ltd. Income Tax Services for Expatriate Americans << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Here's a tricky question: once you, a US citizen, establish yourself as a foreign bona fide resident (say you've lived in a foreign country and met all the requirements, for the last 10 years), can you take a vacation in the USA for more than 30 days, say 6 weeks? IRS Publication 54 and my literal reading of it says "yes". Take a look at example 1 on page 14. But the IRS, as is typical of a bureaucracy, tries to stick as close to the 30 day rule as they can (which is part of the 330 day out of 365 day rule, which is different from the bona fide foreign resident rule). As per the example above--they literally said 30 days in that example. It would have been more helpful if the example was for 45 days. What do you think? If it's close, just say so. If challenged by the IRS I will cite the literal language (I plan on taking a 45 day vacation in the US this year, and am a bona fide foreign expat from the US). RL << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| Tags |
| >, bona, day, earned, exclusion, fide, foreign, income, resident, rule, usa, vacation |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Foreign Earned Income Exclusion for an S Corp admiral-dave: Shortly I will relocated to Guatemala to work several years for a Guat cmpany. This company prefers to contract with me (and pay me) through my US... | Taxes | 8 | 05-05-2006 05:26 AM | |
| foreign earned income- no exclusion ---HELP!!! ovela: HI all. I really really need help with this!!!! 'm a legal US Resident (i've green card) and I have a job with a foreign company - a company in a... | Taxes | 2 | 03-30-2006 09:40 AM | |
| Foreign Earned Income Exclusion menawach@msn.com: Individual retires from the US Air Force and has resided in the Phillippines for the last 10 years. He is going to begin work, either the end of... | Taxes | 3 | 10-19-2005 04:42 AM | |
| Foreign Earned Income Exclusion and State Tax Karl Dunkler: I have a question regarding the acknowledgement of the tax treaty between Germany and the US by Indiana tax authorities and very much hope that you... | Taxes | 5 | 02-25-2004 02:45 PM | |
| Foreign Earned Income Exclusion Dick Adams: Correct me if I am operating under a misconception (and I am certain someone will). Given one's income is below the threshold of the FEIE, is... | Taxes | 2 | 08-02-2003 08:04 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |