|
#9
| |||
| |||
| "Andrew" <andrew[at]losset.net> wrote: - quote - > Barry Margolin wrote:
Suppose you buy the mutual fund the day before it declares> > The fund reduced the NAV at the time they made the > > distributions, so the capital gain at sale time has > > already been reduced, and that avoids the double > > taxation. > Barry - dumb question I've wondered about for a while. If > the NAV is reduced by the amount of the capital gain (which > is true), so what's the big deal about receiving them if the > value of what you own after the distribution is the same? > Or is that true? the gain. The next day it declares the gain. The value of what you own is the same, but suddenly you owe taxes on it. You're paying income or capital gains taxes even though you did not receive any income or increase in value. The term for buying a fund right before it makes a distribution is "buying a dividend". Compare that with owning a fund for the whole year before it makes the distribution. In this case, if its holdings increased in value during the year, so did the NAV. When it distributes the gain, much of this is gain that you actually saw in your holding. So you end up paying taxes on something you actually received. It's still somewhat of a big deal, but not as bad as buying a distribution. Your paper gains are turned into income or realized gains when the fund distributes them, so you can't put off paying taxes. And in the case of capital gain distributions, they may include gains that had been accumulating in the fund for years before you purchased the shares. -- Barry Margolin, barmar[at]alum.mit.edu Arlington, MA *** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group *** << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| "Andrew" <andrew[at]losset.net> writes: - quote - > Barry - dumb question I've wondered about for a while. If
The big deal is that you get taxable income but no> the NAV is reduced by the amount of the capital gain (which > is true), so what's the big deal about receiving them if the > value of what you own after the distribution is the same? economic gain. Assume you buy 1,000sh of a fund at $20/sh. Total value is $20,000. The very next day the fund declares a $2/sh distribution and the NAV drops to $18/sh because of it. If you don't reinvest distributions, you have $18,000 ($18 x 1000sh) of fund + $2,000 cash = $20,000 If you do reinvest distributions, you have $20,000 ($18 x 1111.111sh) of fund/ Either way you have $2,000 ($2 x 1000sh) of taxable income (and a $2,000 unrealized capital loss). If you had waited one more day to buy the fund, you'd be in the same economic position but would have escaped $2,000 of taxable income. -- Rich Carreiro rlcarr[at]animato.arlington.ma.us << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Barry Margolin wrote: - quote - > The fund reduced the NAV at the time they made the
Barry - dumb question I've wondered about for a while. If> distributions, so the capital gain at sale time has > already been reduced, and that avoids the double > taxation. the NAV is reduced by the amount of the capital gain (which is true), so what's the big deal about receiving them if the value of what you own after the distribution is the same? Or is that true? Regards Andrew << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| "chrisexv6" <charry[at]gmail.com> wrote: - quote - > I see there are a TON of cost basis questions on this group,
+ reinvested capital gains> but I couldnt quite get the answer I needed. > My wife has funds that she's held for a long time (15 years > or so). I *know* the dividends were reinvested, but she's > also had capital gains distributions reported for several of > those years. Not being a tax pro, it looks to me like the > capital gain distribs were listed as part of her gross > income on the 1040. > She has now sold 3 of the funds, and we're trying to > determine the cost basis (to get an idea of the tax > implications). My (almost complete) understanding is the > following: > taxable amount from sale = sale price - (original investment > + reinvested dividends) - quote - > My question is where the capital gain distribs fall into
The fund reduced the NAV at the time they made the> place. It makes sense (to me, anyway) that they would be > another amount subtracted from the above calculation, > because they've already had taxes paid on them, thereby > reducing the taxable "profit" from the sale of the funds > (profit in quotes because Im assuming she ended up making > $$$). distributions, so the capital gain at sale time has already been reduced, and that avoids the double taxation. - quote - > Is my logic correct (provided the capital gains distribs
Correct.> WERENT reinvested every year)? > If they WERE reinvested, I assume they are then rolled into > the "reinvested dividends" number in the above calculation? -- Barry Margolin, barmar[at]alum.mit.edu Arlington, MA *** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group *** << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| "chrisexv6" <charry[at]gmail.com> wrote: - quote - > I see there are a TON of cost basis questions on this group,
all reinvested dividends (including capital gain divs) are> but I couldnt quite get the answer I needed. > My wife has funds that she's held for a long time (15 years > or so). I *know* the dividends were reinvested, but she's > also had capital gains distributions reported for several of > those years. Not being a tax pro, it looks to me like the > capital gain distribs were listed as part of her gross > income on the 1040. > She has now sold 3 of the funds, and we're trying to > determine the cost basis (to get an idea of the tax > implications). My (almost complete) understanding is the > following: > taxable amount from sale = sale price - (original investment > + reinvested dividends) > My question is where the capital gain distribs fall into > place. It makes sense (to me, anyway) that they would be > another amount subtracted from the above calculation, > because they've already had taxes paid on them, thereby > reducing the taxable "profit" from the sale of the funds > (profit in quotes because Im assuming she ended up making > $$$). > Is my logic correct (provided the capital gains distribs > WERENT reinvested every year)? > If they WERE reinvested, I assume they are then rolled into > the "reinvested dividends" number in the above calculation? added to cost basis ___________________________________ <<< Benjamin Yazersky, CPA [NJ & NY] > > -----> real address on hobokeni or hobokenx <----- << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| "chrisexv6" <charry[at]gmail.com> writes: - quote - > She has now sold 3 of the funds, and we're trying to
Cap gain distributions only get get subtracted (in your> determine the cost basis (to get an idea of the tax > implications). My (almost complete) understanding is the > following: > taxable amount from sale = sale price - (original investment > + reinvested dividends) > My question is where the capital gain distribs fall into > place. It makes sense (to me, anyway) that they would be > another amount subtracted from the above calculation, > because they've already had taxes paid on them, thereby > reducing the taxable "profit" from the sale of the funds > (profit in quotes because Im assuming she ended up making > $$$). equation above) if they are reinvested. The whole total basis thing is actually very simple: (1) *All* purchases increase basis by the amount of the purchase. (2) *All* reinvestments increase basis by the amount of the distribution, regardless of what type of distribution (dividend, capital gain, return of capital, whatever). (3) Return of capital distributions *reduce* basis by the amount of the distribution, whether or not they are reinvested (of course, if they are reinvested, that reinvestment increases basis back -- see (2) above). And (1) and (2) really could be collapsed together into (1), since all a reinvestment is, is a shortcut to save the fund mailing you a check and you signing the check over to them and mailing it right back to buy more shares. -- Rich Carreiro rlcarr[at]animato.arlington.ma.us << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| chrisexv6 <charry[at]gmail.com> wrote: - quote - > She has now sold 3 of the funds, and we're trying to
If the capital gains were paid to you in cash, they don't> determine the cost basis (to get an idea of the tax > implications). My (almost complete) understanding is the > following: > taxable amount from sale = sale price - (original investment > + reinvested dividends) > My question is where the capital gain distribs fall into > place. affect the basis at all. If they were reinvested into the funds, the amount reinvested is part of the basis. That is, they're treated exactly like dividends for this purpose (the only difference being the tax rate). Seth << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "chrisexv6" <cha...[at]gmail.com> wrote: - quote - > I see there are a TON of cost basis questions on this group,
Reinvested capital gains distributions also are included> but I couldnt quite get the answer I needed. > My wife has funds that she's held for a long time (15 years > or so). I *know* the dividends were reinvested, but she's > also had capital gains distributions reported for several of > those years. Not being a tax pro, it looks to me like the > capital gain distribs were listed as part of her gross > income on the 1040. > She has now sold 3 of the funds, and we're trying to > determine the cost basis (to get an idea of the tax > implications). My (almost complete) understanding is the > following: > taxable amount from sale = sale price - (original investment > + reinvested dividends) > My question is where the capital gain distribs fall into > place. It makes sense (to me, anyway) that they would be > another amount subtracted from the above calculation, > because they've already had taxes paid on them, thereby > reducing the taxable "profit" from the sale of the funds > (profit in quotes because Im assuming she ended up making > $$$). > Is my logic correct (provided the capital gains distribs > WERENT reinvested every year)? > If they WERE reinvested, I assume they are then rolled into > the "reinvested dividends" number in the above calculation? in your basis calculation. So the correct formula is taxable amount from sale = sale price - (original investment + reinvested dividends + reinvested capital gains distributions) If anything was not reinvested, it is not included in the above calculation. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| chrisexv6 wrote: - quote - > I see there are a TON of cost basis questions on this group,
snip> but I couldnt quite get the answer I needed. - quote - > taxable amount from sale = sale price - (original investment
See change in your equation. For your situation, the> + reinvested dividends+reinvested cap gains) > My question is where the capital gain distribs fall into > place. reinvested Cap Gains and Reinvested Dividends are no different, and also no different than if you added small sums to the funds, quarterly, or annually. When distributed, you got cash, paid tax, whether cap gain or dividend, and in your case you used the money to buy more shares. So long as you tracked those new purchases, you have all you need to calculate your basis. Joe JoeTaxpayer.com << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| | |||
| |||
| charry[at]gmail.com (chrisexv6) posted: - quote - > I see there are a TON of cost basis questions
Actually, the equation might better read: Proceeds - Cost> on this group, but I couldnt quite get the > answer I needed. > My wife has funds that she's held for a long > time (15 years or so). I *know* the dividends > were reinvested, but she's also had capital > gains distributions reported for several of > those years. Not being a tax pro, it looks to me > like the capital gain distribs were listed as part > of her gross income on the 1040. > She has now sold 3 of the funds, and we're > trying to determine the cost basis (to get an > idea of the tax implications). My (almost > complete) understanding is the following: > taxable amount from sale = sale price - > (original investment + reinvested dividends) basis = net taxable gain. (The "cost basis" computation is what you're concerned about -- and it should properly include _all_ reinvested funds.) - quote - > My question is where the capital gain distribs
In general, your logic is correct; however, you should> fall into place. It makes sense (to me, anyway) > that they would be another amount subtracted > from the above calculation, because they've > already had taxes paid on them, thereby > reducing the taxable "profit" from the sale of > the funds (profit in quotes because Im > assuming she ended up making $$$). > Is my logic correct (provided the capital gains > distribs WERENT reinvested every year)? > If they WERE reinvested, I assume they are > then rolled into the "reinvested dividends" > number in the above calculation? carefully check statements for previous years (undoubtedly available from the mutual funds involved), or simply phone the customer service number to determine whether CGD (Capital Gains Distributions) were _reinvested_ for your wife's holdings. The most common practice [for mutual funds where reinvestment is requested] is that the mutual fund will reinvest _all_ dividends and distributions. So, if you don't verify this, you might be _understating_ your wife's cost basis ... which would cause her/you [if MFJ] to pay unnecessary extra taxes. Bill << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I see there are a TON of cost basis questions on this group, but I couldnt quite get the answer I needed. My wife has funds that she's held for a long time (15 years or so). I *know* the dividends were reinvested, but she's also had capital gains distributions reported for several of those years. Not being a tax pro, it looks to me like the capital gain distribs were listed as part of her gross income on the 1040. She has now sold 3 of the funds, and we're trying to determine the cost basis (to get an idea of the tax implications). My (almost complete) understanding is the following: taxable amount from sale = sale price - (original investment + reinvested dividends) My question is where the capital gain distribs fall into place. It makes sense (to me, anyway) that they would be another amount subtracted from the above calculation, because they've already had taxes paid on them, thereby reducing the taxable "profit" from the sale of the funds (profit in quotes because Im assuming she ended up making $$$). Is my logic correct (provided the capital gains distribs WERENT reinvested every year)? If they WERE reinvested, I assume they are then rolled into the "reinvested dividends" number in the above calculation? Thanks in advance -Chris << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| Tags |
| basis, calculating, cost |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Calculating Shareholder Basis in S-Corporation CHANGE USERNAME TO westes: I have some questions regarding how "basis" is calculated for a shareholder in an S-Corporation. First, I want to make sure I understand the... | Taxes | 9 | 07-29-2004 11:23 AM | |
| cost basis/avg cost per share David: I've got 2 accounts (mutual funds) set up under a single financial institution. In Portfolio, using Valuations view, Money calculates the cost... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 03-03-2004 12:00 PM | |
| cost basis/avg cost per share David: I've got 2 accounts (mutual funds) set up under a single financial institution. In Portfolio, using Valuations view, Money calculates the cost... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 03-01-2004 12:26 PM | |
| Help in calculating basis in inherited stock lilmslady48: I currently own a stock at Approx. $30 per share. I inherited this stock 4 years ago. The price of the stock at time of inheritance was $28, and... | Taxes | 2 | 02-15-2004 06:01 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |