|
#3
| |||
| |||
| <jeshonster[at]gmail.com> wrote: - quote - > "Phil Marti" <prm20...[at]verizon.net> wrote:
Phil Marti had the only solution. The W2 has a serious> > <jeshons...[at]gmail.com> wrote: > ...I have another question. Could I use the same w-2 form with > blank wages, then fill the amount that needs to go in box 1 > and file the taxes... error and needs to be fixed. The absence of entry other than 2 thru 6 means that nothing was diverted to savings either. Al Levesque << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > Unless you put 100% of your pay into a 401(k) at that
You can try. If you're trying to save time, getting it> > employer, the W-2 is wrong. Regardless of whether any > > income tax was withheld, Box 1 on the W-2 shows your gross > > taxable wages. Get it fixed. > I have another question. Could I use the same w-2 form with > blank wages, then fill the amount that needs to go in box 1 > and file the taxes. This will show the right total of the > wages earned when adding up all the w-2s. Is this a legible > solution? fixed is probably faster. -- Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "Phil Marti" <prm20...[at]verizon.net> wrote: - quote - > <jeshons...[at]gmail.com> wrote:
I have another question. Could I use the same w-2 form with> > I did a mistake when filling up my w-4 employement > > application form for one of my jobs and I guess I chose not > > to pay taxes.Therefore, when I got the w-2 from the > > employer, it had no wages in box 1. It does have Social > > Security wages, the social security tax withheld, Medicare > > wages, and the medicare tax withheld (which are boxes 3, 4, > > 5, and 6) and all the other boxes are empty except 15 which > > mentions the name of the State. > Unless you put 100% of your pay into a 401(k) at that > employer, the W-2 is wrong. Regardless of whether any > income tax was withheld, Box 1 on the W-2 shows your gross > taxable wages. Get it fixed. blank wages, then fill the amount that needs to go in box 1 and file the taxes. This will show the right total of the wages earned when adding up all the w-2s. Is this a legible solution? Thanks for your response Jason << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| | |||
| |||
| <jeshonster[at]gmail.com> wrote: - quote - > I did a mistake when filling up my w-4 employement
Unless you put 100% of your pay into a 401(k) at that> application form for one of my jobs and I guess I chose not > to pay taxes.Therefore, when I got the w-2 from the > employer, it had no wages in box 1. It does have Social > Security wages, the social security tax withheld, Medicare > wages, and the medicare tax withheld (which are boxes 3, 4, > 5, and 6) and all the other boxes are empty except 15 which > mentions the name of the State. employer, the W-2 is wrong. Regardless of whether any income tax was withheld, Box 1 on the W-2 shows your gross taxable wages. Get it fixed. -- Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I did a mistake when filling up my w-4 employement application form for one of my jobs and I guess I chose not to pay taxes.Therefore, when I got the w-2 from the employer, it had no wages in box 1. It does have Social Security wages, the social security tax withheld, Medicare wages, and the medicare tax withheld (which are boxes 3, 4, 5, and 6) and all the other boxes are empty except 15 which mentions the name of the State. I am trying to e-file my taxes using turbotax. Since the wages is blank it does not allow me to leave it blank and turbotax says to put 0 in there for now. After I was done filling in other w-2 forms, I realized that the total income is not what it is supposed to be because of no wages in one of my w-2's. Is it okay to file like this? I read some forums saying that they don't allow to e-file when you have 0 wages in one of the W2's. Some even suggest to put 1 dollar in box 1, is that allowed? What would be the correct way to file the tax? I don't owe any taxes. I am in fact going to get a little bit of return since I had paid taxes on other W2s. I would really appreciate your help and concern in resolving this issue. Thank you very much. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| Tags |
| filing, tax, wages |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Is E-filing federal, and paper filing 1NPR WI state return possible? ams_agarwal@yahoo.com: I'm planning to file my 1040 for federal, and 1NPR (non-resident) for wisconsin. Since Wisconsin doesn't support efiling 1NPR (only if you are a... | Taxes | 4 | 02-10-2007 10:24 AM | |
| Filing a return a second time, due to problems with first filing bm30003700@aol.com: I am having problems getting resolution on a year 2002 tax return filed long ago. IRS incorrectly identified taxpayer, rather than taxpayer's... | Taxes | 2 | 03-09-2006 02:41 AM | |
| E-Filing vs. Papaer Filing and Chances of Audit Todd Cool: I also read somewhere that E-Filing (vs. Paper Filing) increases the chances of an audit since 100% of all data in the return are entered into the... | Taxes | 3 | 02-15-2006 07:37 PM | |
| LLC Question: Filing as sole proprietor instead of partnership or not filing at all. newsbirdie2@hotmail.com: I have a LLC that has been inactive for the past 5 years because I've been living in a foreign country. In hindsight I should have just shut it... | Taxes | 2 | 03-24-2005 04:27 AM | |
| Multiple W-2s- wages do not add up! mbrinkman004: Wondering is someone might be able to explain what I do with 4 W-2s 3 from one employer in which I was a consultant (lived and worked in different... | Taxes | 14 | 03-09-2005 09:01 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |