|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Generally, the "date acquired" for stock acquired through exercise of an option is the date the option was exercised. The "date acquired" for the option is, obviously, the date of grant, unless unvested at that time and not subject to a Sec. 83(b) election (most options aren't), in which case the date of vesting would be the "date acquired" for the option. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| fss[at]altavista.net writes: - quote - > When documenting stock options that were exercised, which
It depends > should be used as the DATE ACQUIRED? > - The date that the options were granted/accepted. > - The date that the options were vested > - The date that the options were exercise . What kind of options are these (ISO or NQO)and what is the calculation you are trying to make? Presumably it's not on Schedule D, since employee stock options virtually never going to show up on Sched D because they can't be sold. -- Rich Carreiro rlcarr[at]animato.arlington.ma.us << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| | |||
| |||
| <fss[at]altavista.net> wrote: - quote - > When documenting stock options that were exercised, which
This depends on several factors. Were these incentive stock> should be used as the DATE ACQUIRED? > - The date that the options were granted/accepted. > - The date that the options were vested > - The date that the options were exercise > I could make a case for any/all of these dates. options (ISOs)? If so, exercise price. I don't see how one could use anything but the exercise date for this, for most qualified options, but perhaps wilier posters have other strategies. See: http://www.irs.gov/taxtopics/tc427.html Good luck. Hank Murphy speaking only for myself << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| When documenting stock options that were exercised, which should be used as the DATE ACQUIRED? - The date that the options were granted/accepted. - The date that the options were vested - The date that the options were exercise I could make a case for any/all of these dates. Tx << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| Tags |
| acquired or sold, date, options |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Stock transactions: Track trade date, or settlement date? Mark3324: In my Ameritrade account, the difference is sometimes five days, if you count the days at both ends. So, if I'm tracking transactions in my... | Taxes | 8 | 07-23-2004 01:41 PM | |
| Re: Tax Relief Software acquired by Thompson Creative Solution Brian Collie: "Frederick Jorden" <fejcpa@erols.com> wrote: > They will replace Tax Releif with Ultra Tax. I am real glad > I did not bite at the early payment... | Taxes | 3 | 07-18-2003 07:24 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |