|
#5
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > > I called them again but they are refusing to do
The IRS appears to have resolved this issue, and approved my> > > anything, on the grounds that the 2005 return is also late > > > (although I have received no other communication about this > > > return). > > > > > Do I have an argument for rescinding the backup withholding > > > because the notice very specifically refers to 2004 (and > > > should not have even been sent out), and is there some IRS > > > termininology I can use to make this argument? > > Getting off the BWH program requires full compliance & > > remedy of the root cause, as well as current compliance file > > the 2005 & 2006 as soon as practical, > > > On 10/15/2007 the annual SWEEP of the master file will > > verify that your in full compliance, and you will be dropped > > from the BWH program on 1/1/2008, at which point your bank > > will be able to stop the W/H. > > > There are solutions to STOP the process sooner, --IF-- you > > are in a HARDSHIP situation. > My point is that I am already in compliance with the terms > of the notice. In any case they said the notice had been > sent out in error, and that it had a "stop put on". > Interesting that I have only received notices from a couple > of banks, nothing from my brokerage account and no > withholding this month either. request to stop backup withholding. I wrote a polite letter to them stating the the backup witholding notice had already been 'satisfied' before the notice had been sent out and that the agent I spoke to told me that a 'stop' had been put on the notice. I have not received any more notices from banks indicating that backup withholding had been imposed. It is almost as if the IRS got partly through the process of send these notices out and then stopped. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > I called them again but they are refusing to do
My point is that I am already in compliance with the terms> > anything, on the grounds that the 2005 return is also late > > (although I have received no other communication about this > > return). > > > Do I have an argument for rescinding the backup withholding > > because the notice very specifically refers to 2004 (and > > should not have even been sent out), and is there some IRS > > termininology I can use to make this argument? > Getting off the BWH program requires full compliance & > remedy of the root cause, as well as current compliance file > the 2005 & 2006 as soon as practical, > On 10/15/2007 the annual SWEEP of the master file will > verify that your in full compliance, and you will be dropped > from the BWH program on 1/1/2008, at which point your bank > will be able to stop the W/H. > There are solutions to STOP the process sooner, --IF-- you > are in a HARDSHIP situation. of the notice. In any case they said the notice had been sent out in error, and that it had a "stop put on". Interesting that I have only received notices from a couple of banks, nothing from my brokerage account and no withholding this month either. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > I called them again but they are refusing to do
Getting off the BWH program requires full compliance &> anything, on the grounds that the 2005 return is also late > (although I have received no other communication about this > return). > Do I have an argument for rescinding the backup withholding > because the notice very specifically refers to 2004 (and > should not have even been sent out), and is there some IRS > termininology I can use to make this argument? remedy of the root cause, as well as current compliance file the 2005 & 2006 as soon as practical, On 10/15/2007 the annual SWEEP of the master file will verify that your in full compliance, and you will be dropped from the BWH program on 1/1/2008, at which point your bank will be able to stop the W/H. There are solutions to STOP the process sooner, --IF-- you are in a HARDSHIP situation. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > > What are the consequences of backup withholding on offshore
I simply have some accounts (UK and UK Channel Islands)> > > accounts? > > Anyone got an answer for this? Essentially I have foreign > > based accounts and I am wondering if the IRS can touch these > > accounts? > I'm still not quite sure what you're asking. I assume that > if there's a treaty provision the offshore institution would > honor a backup withholding request or IRS levy. Without > such a treaty provision it would depend solely on the laws > of the country in question. As you probably know, none of > this affects the taxability of your income from these > accounts. which I know do not submit 1099s. I declare the interest (and also file TDF 90-22.1 forms) so the IRS knows of these accounts. If they don't file 1099s it seems unlikely to me they would undertake backup withholding, but who knows what any treaties might say. - quote - > > I also have a follow-up question. I filed my 2004 tax return
Thanks for the reply anyway.> > late but filed the return and received a refund before > > Christmas 2006. Subsequently I received a CP-541 notice > > dated Jan 1st 2007 for the 2044 tax period. I called the IRS > > and was told I could disregard the letter and that the > > account was "satisfied". Later of course I received letters > > from bank telling me backup withholding was in place, what I > > should have disregarded was being told to disregard the IRS > > notice! I called them again but they are refusing to do > > anything, on the grounds that the 2005 return is also late > > (although I have received no other communication about this > > return). > > > Do I have an argument for rescinding the backup withholding > > because the notice very specifically refers to 2004 (and > > should not have even been sent out), and is there some IRS > > termininology I can use to make this argument? > Sorry, the backup withholding rules are incredibly complex > (you can thank the banking industry), and I don't know the > answer to your question. - quote - > I do know that you can make all the arguments you want, but
I would like to file the missing return but it is going to> the easier course of action would be to start filing your > returns on time. The backup withholding order will be > rescinded after you've been compliant for a period of time > that escapes me. be quicker and easier to write a letter now than file the return anytime soon. Apart from being complex, I recently found that most of my 2005 income might be recharacterized as a capital return and this will not be resolved soon. That's a subject is probably best left for another post. I was trying to find out if there was any IRS terminology I could use to make the point that the 2005 return was not relevant to the reason the backup withholding was implemented (or maybe it is relevant?). << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > What are the consequences of backup withholding on offshore
I'm still not quite sure what you're asking. I assume that> > accounts? > Anyone got an answer for this? Essentially I have foreign > based accounts and I am wondering if the IRS can touch these > accounts? if there's a treaty provision the offshore institution would honor a backup withholding request or IRS levy. Without such a treaty provision it would depend solely on the laws of the country in question. As you probably know, none of this affects the taxability of your income from these accounts. - quote - > I also have a follow-up question. I filed my 2004 tax return
Sorry, the backup withholding rules are incredibly complex> late but filed the return and received a refund before > Christmas 2006. Subsequently I received a CP-541 notice > dated Jan 1st 2007 for the 2044 tax period. I called the IRS > and was told I could disregard the letter and that the > account was "satisfied". Later of course I received letters > from bank telling me backup withholding was in place, what I > should have disregarded was being told to disregard the IRS > notice! I called them again but they are refusing to do > anything, on the grounds that the 2005 return is also late > (although I have received no other communication about this > return). > Do I have an argument for rescinding the backup withholding > because the notice very specifically refers to 2004 (and > should not have even been sent out), and is there some IRS > termininology I can use to make this argument? (you can thank the banking industry), and I don't know the answer to your question. I do know that you can make all the arguments you want, but the easier course of action would be to start filing your returns on time. The backup withholding order will be rescinded after you've been compliant for a period of time that escapes me. -- Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| | |||
| |||
| - quote - > What are the consequences of backup withholding on offshore
Anyone got an answer for this? Essentially I have foreign> accounts? based accounts and I am wondering if the IRS can touch these accounts? I also have a follow-up question. I filed my 2004 tax return late but filed the return and received a refund before Christmas 2006. Subsequently I received a CP-541 notice dated Jan 1st 2007 for the 2044 tax period. I called the IRS and was told I could disregard the letter and that the account was "satisfied". Later of course I received letters from bank telling me backup withholding was in place, what I should have disregarded was being told to disregard the IRS notice! I called them again but they are refusing to do anything, on the grounds that the 2005 return is also late (although I have received no other communication about this return). Do I have an argument for rescinding the backup withholding because the notice very specifically refers to 2004 (and should not have even been sent out), and is there some IRS termininology I can use to make this argument? << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| What are the consequences of backup withholding on offshore accounts? << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| Tags |
| accounts, backup, offshore, withholding |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| NRA, 28% backup withholding, help needed stevels70@googlemail.com: I am a non-resident alien, living and working in Italy for the local branch of a US company, and I exercised some stocks options that my US company... | Taxes | 3 | 01-04-2007 02:49 AM | |
| paying an offshore contractor jamesd: I have an S-Corp in Virgina, USA. I need to pay a person (independent contractor) in Egypt $2,000 for some work they peformed in Egypt for me. ... | Taxes | 6 | 03-09-2006 02:00 AM | |
| Eating cost of backup withholding OK? accounting noob: In the past year I started my own business. I needed help so I enlisted the help of a few contractors to help out with some jobs. Being a complete... | Taxes | 1 | 02-11-2006 06:26 PM | |
| W-9; LLC exempt from backup withholding? BM30003700: My client is an LLC which files form 1065 each year (two partners). Do they check the box marked "exempt" on form W-9? Would the answer be... | Taxes | 1 | 09-28-2003 12:02 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |