|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Harlan Lunsford wrote: - quote - > GOBLUE wrote:
The Code & regs require the student to be enrolled full time.> > Taxpayer's child is 19 years old. The child earned more > > than $3300. Except for the age factor, the child is the > > "qualified child" of taxpayer for dependency purposes. > > > Child enrolls in college as a full time student in August > > and attends first class September 4th. Was child a > > "student" for "any part of five months", or only four > > months? > Gee, I don't know. What did the kid do the other 8 months? > Was he perhaps still in high school through May? > If not, then four months do not "any part of five months" > make. Unless you want to "consider" him a student in August > before he actually attends class. I think most people > would. Most students enroll before the start of classes. Others enroll late. In this case it said the child had enrolled in August. Sounds like 5 months to me. -- Alan http://taxtopics.net << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| GOBLUE wrote: - quote - > Taxpayer's child is 19 years old. The child earned more
Gee, I don't know. What did the kid do the other 8 months?> than $3300. Except for the age factor, the child is the > "qualified child" of taxpayer for dependency purposes. > Child enrolls in college as a full time student in August > and attends first class September 4th. Was child a > "student" for "any part of five months", or only four > months? Was he perhaps still in high school through May? If not, then four months do not "any part of five months" make. Unless you want to "consider" him a student in August before he actually attends class. I think most people would. ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "GOBLUE" <jjhayde...[at]aol.com> wrote: - quote - > Taxpayer's child is 19 years old. The child earned more
Was child in high school? If so s/he was in school for some> than $3300. Except for the age factor, the child is the > "qualified child" of taxpayer for dependency purposes. > Child enrolls in college as a full time student in August > and attends first class September 4th. Was child a > "student" for "any part of five months", or only four > months? part of five months. Missy Doyle << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| | |||
| |||
| GOBLUE wrote: - quote - > Taxpayer's child is 19 years old. The child earned more
School includes elementary and high school, so if the child> than $3300. Except for the age factor, the child is the > "qualified child" of taxpayer for dependency purposes. > Child enrolls in college as a full time student in August > and attends first class September 4th. Was child a > "student" for "any part of five months", or only four > months? attended high school full-time for at least one month in the same year, yes. Otherwise, no. -Mark Bole << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Taxpayer's child is 19 years old. The child earned more than $3300. Except for the age factor, the child is the "qualified child" of taxpayer for dependency purposes. Child enrolls in college as a full time student in August and attends first class September 4th. Was child a "student" for "any part of five months", or only four months? Jim Hayden EA << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| Tags |
| definition, student |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Support vs. gift definition Mark Bole: Following is an excerpt from a thread on a financial planning newsgroup, just curious what answers are forthcoming from the crowd here. >>... | Taxes | 1 | 12-17-2006 12:58 AM | |
| definition of manufacturing under WTO RAO: we are looking for a definition of manufacturing under WTO. We are converters of paper with facilities for sheeting, slitting and guillotine... | Taxes | 2 | 02-15-2004 03:44 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |