| |||||||
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| es330td wrote: - quote - > (Disclaimer: I know I tried to do too much by myself with
First, S corporations do not pay dividends. You and your> too little information. If I am just stuck I understand > that is the price I pay for not getting more advice.) > Back in 2002 a friend and I incorporated a small > programming/computer consulting business and filed the S > corp election in Texas. > As we would make money we would simply write ourselves > checks from the corporate bank account, splitting income > 50/50. On a quarterly basis we were required to report > payments made to employees to the Texas Workforce > Commission, which we did and reported all the money we had > distributed to ourselves. We did this lacking knowledge of > the difference between wages and distributions/dividends. > In filing the '03 and '04 941 forms we reported the amounts > we had reported to TWC and in doing so generated tax > liabilities for SS, FICA withholding. > Never at any time did we tell an employee (myself and my > partner were the only employees the company ever had) that > we had withheld anything and when W-2's were generated the > amounts shown for the various amounts withheld were zero so > we ended up paying these taxes ourselves on our 1040's. > I have verified with TWC that they will let me go back and > decrease the amounts reported as wages to them as the monies > given to the two owners were handled as dividends, not > salaries. > I am then hoping to file a correction with the IRS to get > the wages reclassified as dividends. I realize that this > will require me and my partner to file revised 1040's for > '03 and '04. > As tax was paid by us on the monies distributed the only > "loss" the IRS would be looking at would be the 6.2% > employer matching SS taxes and the amount for the two tax > years would be around $1000. > I recognize that doing this will essentially require me to > refile almost every form for 2003 and 2004 as this impacts > W-2s, W-3s, 1099-DIVs, K-1's, 1120S, 940 and 941 plus our > personal 1040's. What I don't know is if I will be allowed > to by the IRS to do it. co-owner are taxed on all of your distributive shares of income from the corporation, regardless of whether it was distributed to you. I presume you understand that part, and intended to say that you paid tax on your distributive shares of income, not on the "monies distributed." If all of the corporation's gross income arose from personal services performed by you and your co-owner, it is appropriate for all, or virtually all, of the excess of gross income over expenses to be paid to the two of you as salary, subject to FICA, etc. On the other hand, if part of the corporation's earnings arise from other sources, such as the use of equipment owned by the corporation or the services of other employees, then it would be appropriate for that proportion of your distributive shares not to be treated as salary. Another way to analyze the issue is to consider what you would have to pay an employee with your skills to perform the services you perform for the corporation, or what you would expect as compensation if you were to perform the same services as an employee for an unrelated entity. In other words, since this appears to be primarily a personal service business, it is not likely that there is a lot to get back. You certainly can file amended documentation and amended individual income tax returns. However, the IRS may disallow or reduce your claims for refund based on its estimate of a reasonable salary for the services you performed for the corporation. There is no way you can, or should, get back 100% of the employment taxes you paid. In the future you should agree on a reasonable salary for your services and report it that way. You should be able to avoid employment taxes on some of your distributive shares of income -- but not on all of it. Katie in San Diego << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| "es330td" <es330td[at]gmail.com> wrote: - quote - > Brew1 wrote:
out of curiosity, how much in federal tax savings do you> > The IRS requires "adequate compensation" for your work to be > > paid in wages. Otherwise, most S-corps would do what you > > are attempting. Profit over and above that can be in the > > form of distributions. > Thanks for your response. > I had heard this before and I knew this. I hadn't intended > to zero out the W-2 wages, just reduce them so that 100% of > the monies earned aren't reported as salary vs. > distributions. The question I have is whether anyone thinks > the IRS will reject it if I file correction documents > showing the modified amounts. expect to achieve? << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "es330td" <es330td[at]gmail.com> wrote: - quote - > Brew1 wrote:
From the sounds of it, you and you're partner have managed> > The IRS requires "adequate compensation" for your work to be > > paid in wages. Otherwise, most S-corps would do what you > > are attempting. Profit over and above that can be in the > > form of distributions. > Thanks for your response. > I had heard this before and I knew this. I hadn't intended > to zero out the W-2 wages, just reduce them so that 100% of > the monies earned aren't reported as salary vs. > distributions. The question I have is whether anyone thinks > the IRS will reject it if I file correction documents > showing the modified amounts. to screw things up pretty good. The best advice I can give you is too let a professional handle it, call a CPA and let him get this done for you, or you could be looking at even more headaches << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Brew1 wrote: - quote - > The IRS requires "adequate compensation" for your work to be
Thanks for your response.> paid in wages. Otherwise, most S-corps would do what you > are attempting. Profit over and above that can be in the > form of distributions. I had heard this before and I knew this. I hadn't intended to zero out the W-2 wages, just reduce them so that 100% of the monies earned aren't reported as salary vs. distributions. The question I have is whether anyone thinks the IRS will reject it if I file correction documents showing the modified amounts. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| | |||
| |||
| The IRS requires "adequate compensation" for your work to be paid in wages. Otherwise, most S-corps would do what you are attempting. Profit over and above that can be in the form of distributions. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| (Disclaimer: I know I tried to do too much by myself with too little information. If I am just stuck I understand that is the price I pay for not getting more advice.) Back in 2002 a friend and I incorporated a small programming/computer consulting business and filed the S corp election in Texas. As we would make money we would simply write ourselves checks from the corporate bank account, splitting income 50/50. On a quarterly basis we were required to report payments made to employees to the Texas Workforce Commission, which we did and reported all the money we had distributed to ourselves. We did this lacking knowledge of the difference between wages and distributions/dividends. In filing the '03 and '04 941 forms we reported the amounts we had reported to TWC and in doing so generated tax liabilities for SS, FICA withholding. Never at any time did we tell an employee (myself and my partner were the only employees the company ever had) that we had withheld anything and when W-2's were generated the amounts shown for the various amounts withheld were zero so we ended up paying these taxes ourselves on our 1040's. I have verified with TWC that they will let me go back and decrease the amounts reported as wages to them as the monies given to the two owners were handled as dividends, not salaries. I am then hoping to file a correction with the IRS to get the wages reclassified as dividends. I realize that this will require me and my partner to file revised 1040's for '03 and '04. As tax was paid by us on the monies distributed the only "loss" the IRS would be looking at would be the 6.2% employer matching SS taxes and the amount for the two tax years would be around $1000. I recognize that doing this will essentially require me to refile almost every form for 2003 and 2004 as this impacts W-2s, W-3s, 1099-DIVs, K-1's, 1120S, 940 and 941 plus our personal 1040's. What I don't know is if I will be allowed to by the IRS to do it. Any opinions or experiences? Thanks for your unofficial advice. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| Tags |
| converting, corp, dividends, irs, needed, opinions, past, wages |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Re: Small % of S corp profit paid as wages - problematic? Bill Brown: Lance Mannion wrote: > I noticed on a past return that I only paid 15k as a W2 > wage, and 90k on Schedule E for my S corp. I know this > does... | Taxes | 1 | 05-02-2005 05:15 AM | |
| S Corporation: Dividends vs Wages + General Tax Info? foodfightr@gmail.com: Hello, I recently had an attorney file to form an S Corporation. I am the sole owner of the corporation and have no employees. All people who are... | Taxes | 4 | 03-09-2005 09:39 PM | |
| S-corp wages MTW: Can anyone cite something AUTHORITATIVE within the meaning of Circular 230, Section 10.34(d)(1) to support the theory that an S-corp shareholder... | Taxes | 28 | 11-01-2004 06:36 PM | |
| Information on taxes needed please, information only no intent to debate or contest opinions Friendships and Networking: This really is intended for mere information purposes. The examples I hope illustrate my confusion. I posted this on Ask the Experts as well,... | Taxes | 5 | 04-23-2004 04:18 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |