|
#11
| |||
| |||
| Seth Breidbart wrote: - quote - > What if his son then donated that use to charity? The son
I'm not sure, but I'd guess the answer to be "no." Among> is donating *all* of his rights in the property, so does he > get a deduction? other problems, the "right to use" is probably an ordinary income property (not a capital gain property) and therefore different rules would apply for charitable deduction purposes. MTW << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| Seth Breidbart wrote: - quote - > What if his son then donated that use to charity? The son
I'm not sure, but I'd guess the answer to be "no." Among> is donating *all* of his rights in the property, so does he > get a deduction? other problems, the "right to use" is probably an ordinary income property (not a capital gain property) and therefore different rules would apply for charitable deduction purposes. MTW << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| MTW wrote: - quote - > salmoneous[at]aol.com wrote:
This is the correct answer to the original question.> > I know one of the justifications for not giving a deduction > > for time share use donations is you can't presume a value > > for that use. But here we have a clear and established > > value. Is there still no deductions? > There is no deduction because you are only giving a PARTIAL > interest in the property, ie: the right to use it for a > week. > Now, if you gave your ENTIRE right, title and interest in > the timeshare ownership per se, you might have something to > talk about, deduction wise. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap[at]lexregia.com> wrote: - quote - > Funny. If he were to give, say, his son the exclusive use
What if his son then donated that use to charity? The son> of the timeshare for one year (assuming a value of more than > $12,000) the IRS would want to value it and require a gift > tax return to be filed. > But the same gift to charity would not result in a > deduction. is donating *all* of his rights in the property, so does he get a deduction? Seth << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Stuart A. Bronstein wrote: - quote - > Funny. If he were to give, say, his son the exclusive use
The point being, the rules for gifts for gift tax purposes,> of the timeshare for one year (assuming a value of more than > $12,000) the IRS would want to value it and require a gift > tax return to be filed. > But the same gift to charity would not result in a > deduction. and gifts for charitable deduction purposes are not, not, not the same. This seems to be a point of frequent confusion. <grin MTW << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > > You can't get a deduction for something that really doesn't
I donate it to Friends of the (other) Library, a 501(c)(3)> > > cost you anything. > > You can if it's goods. > > > For instance, you grab a bunch of books at the end of a > > library sale, when they're asking people to just take them > > away. A couple of years later, you notice that one of them > > is a first edition of some rare book. You donate it to a > > charity which sells it for $500. I think you get the > > deduction. > But if the 'fair value' (is there such a thing for old > books?) is $200, the auction winner would have a charitable > deduction of just $300. organization. Someone there notices what it is, and calls a dealer who offers $500. They take it. So fair market value is clearly $500 (possibly more, since the dealer immediately sold it to his customer for $700). Since the charity sold it within two years, my deduction is the lesser of fmv and the price they got, namely $500. Seth << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| "MTW" <mtwingcpa[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > salmoneous[at]aol.com wrote:
Funny. If he were to give, say, his son the exclusive use> > I know one of the justifications for not giving a deduction > > for time share use donations is you can't presume a value > > for that use. But here we have a clear and established > > value. Is there still no deductions? > There is no deduction because you are only giving a PARTIAL > interest in the property, ie: the right to use it for a > week. > Now, if you gave your ENTIRE right, title and interest in > the timeshare ownership per se, you might have something to > talk about, deduction wise. of the timeshare for one year (assuming a value of more than $12,000) the IRS would want to value it and require a gift tax return to be filed. But the same gift to charity would not result in a deduction. I suppose that whatever deduction there would be would come from the fact that income generated by the gift would belong to the charity, not the donor. Stu << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| salmoneous[at]aol.com wrote: - quote - > I know one of the justifications for not giving a deduction
There is no deduction because you are only giving a PARTIAL> for time share use donations is you can't presume a value > for that use. But here we have a clear and established > value. Is there still no deductions? interest in the property, ie: the right to use it for a week. Now, if you gave your ENTIRE right, title and interest in the timeshare ownership per se, you might have something to talk about, deduction wise. MTW << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Seth Breidbart wrote: - quote - > Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap[at]sbcglobal.net> wrote:
But if the 'fair value' (is there such a thing for old> > You can't get a deduction for something that really doesn't > > cost you anything. > You can if it's goods. > For instance, you grab a bunch of books at the end of a > library sale, when they're asking people to just take them > away. A couple of years later, you notice that one of them > is a first edition of some rare book. You donate it to a > charity which sells it for $500. I think you get the > deduction. books?) is $200, the auction winner would have a charitable deduction of just $300. This is the case when making any donation and receiving something in return. If the OP rented the place by the week, and claimed the property as an income property, I'd suspect there would be a case that a fair value is easy to establish and that would be the OP's deduction. But the donor would just get the value in excess of that figure (as a deduction). JOE << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| sethb[at]panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: - quote - > Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap[at]sbcglobal.net> wrote:
You're partly right. You can't deduct the full value if the> > You can't get a deduction for something that really doesn't > > cost you anything. > You can if it's goods. > For instance, you grab a bunch of books at the end of a > library sale, when they're asking people to just take them > away. A couple of years later, you notice that one of them > is a first edition of some rare book. You donate it to a > charity which sells it for $500. I think you get the > deduction. gift is to a private foundation. It also can't deduct the full value if its use is unrelated to the exempt purpose of the organization. For example if it's a rare book but not a religious one, the gift to a church will not result in your being able to deduct its full value. (Technically you can deduct its full value, but have to recognize the capital gain of its increase in value.) Stu << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap[at]sbcglobal.net> wrote: - quote - > You can't get a deduction for something that really doesn't
You can if it's goods.> cost you anything. For instance, you grab a bunch of books at the end of a library sale, when they're asking people to just take them away. A couple of years later, you notice that one of them is a first edition of some rare book. You donate it to a charity which sells it for $500. I think you get the deduction. Seth << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| | |||
| |||
| salmoneous[at]aol.com wrote: - quote - > I know that, in general, there is no tax deduction when use
You can't get a deduction for something that really doesn't> of a time-share is donated to charity. Is always the case? > In particular... if there is a charity auction, you donate > one-week's stay in your timeshare as an item to be auctioned > off, the week's stay goes up for bid, the winning bidder > pays $500 to the charity. cost you anything. Ok, it costs you the rent you could have gotten, but that would have been taxable. So you aren't considered to have given up anything for tax purposes. If you have actual out-of-pocket expenses related to the timeshare, you might be able to deduct the pro-rata portion of those. But that's probably about it. Stu << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I know that, in general, there is no tax deduction when use of a time-share is donated to charity. Is always the case? In particular... if there is a charity auction, you donate one-week's stay in your timeshare as an item to be auctioned off, the week's stay goes up for bid, the winning bidder pays $500 to the charity. I know one of the justifications for not giving a deduction for time share use donations is you can't presume a value for that use. But here we have a clear and established value. Is there still no deductions? << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| Tags |
| auction, charity, sold, timeshare |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Timeshare for S-corp? Bill Bourbonnais, EA: I haven't been able to track anything down at irs.gov, CCH, TaxAnalysts, etc. on this specific situation. Hopefully someone on MTM can help out: ... | Taxes | 2 | 04-12-2005 08:55 PM | |
| Sale of deeded timeshare at loss: still not deductible? chris.hudel@gmail.com: I read this group's history regarding the deuctibility of the loss on sales of timeshares and I'm seeking updated advice for the 2004 filing... | Taxes | 4 | 02-10-2005 04:35 AM | |
| Vehicle donated to charity but not sold by charity Cathy: A client has donated a vehicle to a charity. The charity in turn gave it to a family they were helping during this past Christmas season. It was... | Taxes | 5 | 01-12-2005 10:34 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |