|
#2
| |||
| |||
| davidmetzger0[at]gmail.com wrote: - quote - > Was this extended in new legislation?
No.<< ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| eddavidmetzger0[at]gmail.com wrote: - quote - > Was this extended in new legislation?
Not yet---hopefully soon.ed << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| | |||
| |||
| davidmetzger0[at]gmail.com wrote: - quote - > Was this extended in new legislation?
As best I can tell that provision has not yet been extended.<< ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Was this extended in new legislation? << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| Tags |
| 2006, deduction, sales, tax |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Sales tax deduction for 2005 tax return tfrieling@gmail.com: I am trying to figure out the rules regarding using the sales tax deduction instead of the income tax deduction. I bought a new SUV in November of... | Taxes | 5 | 01-20-2006 09:54 PM | |
| Sales Tax deduction for all states? hawks5999: When calculating your sales tax deduction using actual receipts, can you deduct sales tax paid outside your home state. Travelled quite a bit last... | Taxes | 5 | 01-22-2005 05:30 PM | |
| New State Sales-tax deduction. jointhenlcpn@yahoo.com: Can you use credit card and debit card statements to calculate sales tax paid in 2004 or do you need actual sales receipts, I only became aware of... | Taxes | 6 | 01-15-2005 06:42 PM | |
| State Sales Tax Deduction Andy: The new tax laws allowing people in states that have no income tax, such as Texas, to deduct the sales tax they paid, has raised a question, for... | Taxes | 23 | 01-07-2005 04:47 PM | |
| sales tax deduction Joan Kaapke: I live in Texas and plan to itemize for 2004. I understand I may be able to deduct sales tax. I don't have receipts, so am wondering if there... | Taxes | 30 | 11-12-2004 05:38 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |