|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Vijay Sharma wrote: - quote - > Thanks to both of you for replying. A follow up question -
That's right. You still report the income and expenses of> For a single member LLC, Federal does not require any tax > filings for the business (Schedule C at the personal member > level) but California requires Form 568. Is this correct? the SMLLC on Schedule C for California, but you file the 568 to cover the minimum tax and fee. Katie in San Diego << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| "Vijay Sharma" <SharmaV[at]Sutterhealth.org> wrote: - quote - > For a single member LLC, Federal does not require any tax
LLC's aren't recognized for federal tax purposes. So you> filings for the business (Schedule C at the personal member > level) but California requires Form 568. Is this correct? treat it as the entity it is being taxed as. Stu << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Thanks to both of you for replying. A follow up question - For a single member LLC, Federal does not require any tax filings for the business (Schedule C at the personal member level) but California requires Form 568. Is this correct? << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts > << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy > << are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Vijay Sharma wrote: - quote - > For a LLC elected to be a taxed as a Partnership, is the
Like a partnership would be the simplest way -- minimal> books (financial accounting) done like a Partnership or like > an S Corp or a different way? adjustments to make for tax purposes. - quote - > As far as income tax is concerned, do LLCs and S Corps have
An LLC (single or multiple member) files California Form 568> special California (State) tax filing requirements, i.e. > special tax forms to be prepared for LLC or S Corp or at a > personal level for such shareholders? and pays the $800 minimum tax and the fee (which is zero unless it the LLC's total income is more than $250,000). A multiple member LLC completes Schedule K and K-1's for all the members. An individual member of a multiple member LLC reports the information from his or her K-1 on Schedule E of the 1040 and shows any necessary California adjustments (differences between the federal and California K-1's) on Form 540, Schedule CA. A single member reports the income and expenses of the LLC on Schedule C for both California and federal purposes. An S corporation files California Form 100S and pays the corporate franchise tax on its California taxable income at a reduced rate of 1.5%, but not less than the $800 minimum. Each stockholder gets a K-1 and reports the income from it on federal Schedule E and makes the California adjustments on the 540-CA if necessary. A stockholder who provides services to the corporation receives a salary which is reported by the corporation on a W-2 and reported by the stockholder as wage income. Katie in San Diego << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| | |||
| |||
| Vijay Sharma wrote: - quote - > For a LLC elected to be a taxed as a Partnership, is the
For the books of the LLC, I simply substitute the word> books (financial accounting) done like a Partnership or like > an S Corp or a different way? > As far as income tax is concerned, do LLCs and S Corps have > special California (State) tax filing requirements, i.e. > special tax forms to be prepared for LLC or S Corp or at a > personal level for such shareholders? > Thanks in advance for any input. "member" vice "partner". ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA Sun July 30, 2006 << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| For a LLC elected to be a taxed as a Partnership, is the books (financial accounting) done like a Partnership or like an S Corp or a different way? As far as income tax is concerned, do LLCs and S Corps have special California (State) tax filing requirements, i.e. special tax forms to be prepared for LLC or S Corp or at a personal level for such shareholders? Thanks in advance for any input. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| Tags |
| corp, llc |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| claiming 179 deduction for S corp in excess of S corp income Kelly: I have a taxpayer who is a 100% shareholder of an S corp. I am completing the 1120S and related form 4562 (Depr & Amort). I would like to claim a... | Taxes | 4 | 03-10-2006 04:14 AM | |
| Is there some site that lists the differences between S-Corp and C-Corp (and LLC)? John: I'm getting lost in the differences between the S-Corp and C-Corp. They treat medical savings plans differently, they treat fringe benefits... | Taxes | 1 | 08-26-2004 01:42 AM | |
| suspended k-1 loss, s corp goes to c corp BM30003700: a client of mine revoked s corp status prior to march 15, 2003, so became c corp effective 1/1/03. at 12/31/02, had approximately zero basis in s... | Taxes | 1 | 10-11-2003 06:43 AM | |
| Tax motivations to switch to an S-Corp from a C-Corp... Tripp Knightly: I realize the decision to choose / switch S over C is more than just current-year tax liability & avoiding double tax, but I want to understand the... | Taxes | 3 | 07-30-2003 07:38 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |