|
#8
| |||
| |||
| A.G. Kalman wrote: - quote - > Mark Bole wrote: > > Having spent some non-trivial time researching (for example, > > the CCH newsletter referenced here), I am still coming up > > short on any mention of the above subject. > > > Is it a good bet to assume it is really kaput as of 2006? [...] - quote - > It expired at the end of 2005 and as of this moment in time,
Thank you all for the responses. I asked because I've only> has not been renewed by Congress. The Tax Increase > Prevention and Reconciliation Act failed to include the > extender's legislation for various tax benefits that expired > or are expiring. The extension legislation is bogged down > with all the other tax legislation relating to energy, > pension reform, transfer taxes, etc. recently started paying attention to the changes in individual income taxes over the last five years, and was startled at how dramatic they are (AMT cutoffs, child tax credit, capital gains rates, etc). Certain "holy cows" (oops, I mean, "sacred cows") such as temporarily increased AMT cutoffs (passed) and optional state sales tax deduction (not yet passed) seem to get the most mentions in the mainstream press. In other words, more than once I've read something like "Congress may very well extend the optional state sales tax deduction". The educator expense deduction (expired) doesn't get much mention because it wasn't worth much to begin with, but I was surprised that the much more substantial Tuition & Fees deduction seemed to be going away without even a whimper. Regarding the comment on QTP's (state 529 plan) I don't understand how there could be any tax benefit from putting money into a 529 plan and then taking it right back out...(no earnings)? -Mark Bole << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << If you want a professional tax opinion, you are advised > << to contact a Certified Public Accountant, an Enrolled > << Agent, or a Tax Attorney. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| tobe <ybotkaSPM[at]cinci.rr.com> wrote: - quote - > "Mark Bole" wrote
Where do you get to deduct the money you place in the 529?> > Having spent some non-trivial time researching (for example, > > the CCH newsletter referenced here), I am still coming up > > short on any mention of the above subject. > > > Is it a good bet to assume it is really kaput as of 2006? > Even if a trailer bill extending this does not pass, an > alternative tax strategy is to put tuition funds in a State > 529 plan, then turn right around and pay the tuition from > the 529, tax free! __ Art Kamlet ArtKamlet [at] AOL.com Columbus OH K2PZH << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << If you want a professional tax opinion, you are advised > << to contact a Certified Public Accountant, an Enrolled > << Agent, or a Tax Attorney. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| "tobe" <ybotkaSPM[at]cinci.rr.com> wrote: - quote - > Even if a trailer bill extending this does not pass, an
There's no point to this since 529 contributions are not> alternative tax strategy is to put tuition funds in a State > 529 plan, then turn right around and pay the tuition from > the 529, tax free! deductible, at the Federal level at least. The Federal tax advantage to 529's is that earnings will not be taxed if ultimately used for qualified expenses. -- Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << If you want a professional tax opinion, you are advised > << to contact a Certified Public Accountant, an Enrolled > << Agent, or a Tax Attorney. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Dont worry. There's an election coming up and Congress has an unbounded capacity to pander. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << If you want a professional tax opinion, you are advised > << to contact a Certified Public Accountant, an Enrolled > << Agent, or a Tax Attorney. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| "Mark Bole" <makbo[at]pacbell.net> wrote - quote - > Having spent some non-trivial time researching (for example,
Nothing is a good bet in an election year. Look for a> the CCH newsletter referenced here), I am still coming up > short on any mention of the above subject. > Is it a good bet to assume it is really kaput as of 2006? "trailer" bill to add back some of the juicy tidbits of tax breaks that lapsed and were not included in the "Tax Increase Prevention and Reconcillation Act of 2005" that was signed into law in May. Among the popular items is the Tuition deduction (above the line) as well as the $250 teacher classroom supplies tax break among others. If it makes the CongressCritters feel good, you can bet they'll make sure it's on Headline News for a week. -- Paul Thomas, CPA paulthomascpapc[at]bellsouth.net << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << If you want a professional tax opinion, you are advised > << to contact a Certified Public Accountant, an Enrolled > << Agent, or a Tax Attorney. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Mark Bole wrote: - quote - > Having spent some non-trivial time researching (for example,
It expired at the end of 2005 and as of this moment in time,> the CCH newsletter referenced here), I am still coming up > short on any mention of the above subject. > Is it a good bet to assume it is really kaput as of 2006? > CCH Tax Briefing: > Highlights > Updated May 17, 2006 > TAX INCREASE PREVENTION AND RECONCILIATION ACT has not been renewed by Congress. The Tax Increase Prevention and Reconciliation Act failed to include the extender's legislation for various tax benefits that expired or are expiring. The extension legislation is bogged down with all the other tax legislation relating to energy, pension reform, transfer taxes, etc. See the following link if you care to follow the history of the above: http://ria.thomson.com/taxwatch/ << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Mark Bole wrote: - quote - > Having spent some non-trivial time researching (for example,
Unless it's reinstated by Congress, it is gone after 2005> the CCH newsletter referenced here), I am still coming up > short on any mention of the above subject. > Is it a good bet to assume it is really kaput as of 2006? > CCH Tax Briefing: > Highlights > Updated May 17, 2006 > TAX INCREASE PREVENTION AND RECONCILIATION ACT ed << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "Mark Bole" wrote - quote - > Having spent some non-trivial time researching (for example,
Even if a trailer bill extending this does not pass, an> the CCH newsletter referenced here), I am still coming up > short on any mention of the above subject. > Is it a good bet to assume it is really kaput as of 2006? alternative tax strategy is to put tuition funds in a State 529 plan, then turn right around and pay the tuition from the 529, tax free! << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| | |||
| |||
| "Mark Bole" <makbo[at]pacbell.net> wrote: - quote - > Having spent some non-trivial time researching (for example,
not aware of any change in the recent tax law affecting that> the CCH newsletter referenced here), I am still coming up > short on any mention of the above subject. > Is it a good bet to assume it is really kaput as of 2006? > CCH Tax Briefing: > Highlights > Updated May 17, 2006 > TAX INCREASE PREVENTION AND RECONCILIATION ACT deduction ___________________________________ <<< Benjamin Yazersky, CPA [NJ & NY] > > -----> real address on hobokeni or hobokenx <----- << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, > << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties > << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. > << > << If you want a professional tax opinion, you are advised > << to contact a Certified Public Accountant, an Enrolled > << Agent, or a Tax Attorney. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Having spent some non-trivial time researching (for example, the CCH newsletter referenced here), I am still coming up short on any mention of the above subject. Is it a good bet to assume it is really kaput as of 2006? CCH Tax Briefing: Highlights Updated May 17, 2006 TAX INCREASE PREVENTION AND RECONCILIATION ACT -Mark Bole << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| Tags |
| 2006, deduction, expiration, fees, tuition |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Tuition deduction when tuition was paid with student loans Nathan: I am working on my 2005 Federal and Arizona taxes. In 2005 my wife received a disbursement of about $8.5K to pay for her education expenses,... | Taxes | 5 | 04-10-2006 06:35 AM | |
| Tuition Expence Deduction in 2006? valentino: I prepared estimated taxes for 2006 with turbo tax and i noticed that the tuition expense for my son (in the past couple of years was up to 4000)... | Taxes | 3 | 02-23-2006 07:47 AM | |
| tuition fees deduction nosredna: My daughter was a full-time college student in 2003, took 2004 off to work, and is now back in school. During 2004, we (her parents) paid an... | Taxes | 1 | 04-02-2005 07:17 AM | |
| Can I claim the credit for "Tuition and Fees" Deduction? Andrew: Situation: My son will be a first year student this semester at College and will be, of course, listed as dependent on my return. He paid his... | Taxes | 4 | 09-06-2004 08:06 PM | |
| Tuition and Fees deduction Ken: I was very disappointed after purchasing Money 2004 to find out that it does not include the tuition and fees deduction calculation. Before I... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 09-06-2003 11:39 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |