|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Nan, EA in LA wrote: - quote - > If I understand you correctly - neither - since all the
As to the accounting method used on schedule A, I must> payments FOR 2005 were paid in 2006. Schedule A is purely > calendar basis. Not accrual. You deduct on Schedule A only > those state taxes PAID IN 2005, no matter what year they > were for. disagree. It is whatever method the taxpayer has chosen within the meaning of IRC 446. Although 446(d) allows a taxpayer to have a differing method for each trade or business from each other and/or his MAIN METHOD, there is absolutely nothing in the IRC itself that mandates itemized deductions as a whole to be cash basis only. I shall grant that there are certain itemized deductions that seem as if they are "cash basis" (e.g. contributions - requiring a completed gift), but there are others that have no such requirement (e.g. taxes, especially real estate property tax). - quote - > We run into problems with clients who pay their 4 estimates
True only because all your individual clients are cash basis> according to the date on the vouchers, and don't understand > why we use what they paid to California in January 2005 FOR > THE FOURTH PAYMENT FOR 2004, and don't use the 4th payment > for 2005 made in January 2006. > Withholding, on the other hand, is always paid within the > calendar year. for their non-business affairs (as is 99% of the population, but there are a few who are not). << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > We run into problems with clients who pay their 4 estimates
UltraTax includes a 1040ES package and allows a check> > according to the date on the vouchers, and don't understand > > why we use what they paid to California in January 2005 FOR > > THE FOURTH PAYMENT FOR 2004, and don't use the 4th payment > > for 2005 made in January 2006. > One preparer told me that she tells all her clients to pay the > 4th installment in December, to avoid having to try to explain > this. > Bob Sandler the box option of printing a December date on the 4th voucher. __ Art Kamlet ArtKamlet [at] AOL.com Columbus OH K2PZH << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > We run into problems with clients who pay their 4 estimates
One preparer told me that she tells all her clients to pay the> according to the date on the vouchers, and don't understand > why we use what they paid to California in January 2005 FOR > THE FOURTH PAYMENT FOR 2004, and don't use the 4th payment > for 2005 made in January 2006. 4th installment in December, to avoid having to try to explain this. Bob Sandler << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > I filed tax return extensions in April for both my Fed Tax
Neither. You don't put any of that California tax on your> Return and California Tax Return. I paid about $9000 for > California Tax at that time. Now I am working on filing the > return and found out that I need to pay about $11000 for > California Tax. > In this case, for 1040, should I use the Standard Deduction or > Itermized deduction? In Schedue A of 1040, for the state tax item, > should I put $9000, or $11000? federal return because you are filing your federal return for 2005, but you paid the California tax in 2006. You will be able to deduct it on Schedule A of your federal return for 2006, which you will file in 2007. It doesn't matter that the California tax was FOR 2005. You take the deduction in the year that you PAID it, not the year it is FOR. The way you decide whether to use the standard deduction or itemized deductions is to see which is higher. If the total itemized deductions on the last line of Schedule A are higher than your standard deduction, then take the itemized deductions. If the itemized deductions are less than the standard deduction, then take the standard deduction. (There are a few unusual situations where the rules require that you itemize, or require that you take the standard deduction. One such situation occurs if your filing status is married filing separately.) Bob Sandler << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| "quickcur[at]yahoo.com" <quickcur[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > I filed tax return extensions in April for both my Fed Tax
For most people, it's best to use whichever deduction is> Return and California Tax Return. I paid about $9000 for > California Tax at that time. Now I am working on filing the > return and found out that I need to pay about $11000 for > California Tax. > In this case, for 1040, should I use the Standard Deduction or larger. There was a thread sometime last year discussing some exceptional cases. - quote - > Itermized deduction? In Schedue A of 1040, for the state tax item,
When you're filling in your federal tax return for 2005, you> should I put $9000, or $11000? deduct the amount of state tax you paid IN 2005, not the amount you paid FOR 2005. That would be the amount you had withheld last year plus the amount you sent in last year with your 2004 state tax return. If you find that you have to pay more now, it will be deducted on your 2006 return, which you'll fill out next year. -- Barry Margolin, barmar[at]alum.mit.edu Arlington, MA *** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group *** << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| quickcur[at]yahoo.com wrote: - quote - > I filed tax return extensions in April for both my Fed Tax
Neither. California income taxes paid in 2006 are deducted> Return and California Tax Return. I paid about $9000 for > California Tax at that time. Now I am working on filing the > return and found out that I need to pay about $11000 for > California Tax. > In this case, for 1040, should I use the Standard Deduction or > Itermized deduction? In Schedue A of 1040, for the state tax item, > should I put $9000, or $11000? on your federal 2006 return, not your 2005. When you finally file your 2005 federal return you can deduct state income taxes paid in 2005 if your 2005 itemized deductions exceed your standard deduction. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| If I understand you correctly - neither - since all the payments FOR 2005 were paid in 2006. Schedule A is purely calendar basis. Not accrual. You deduct on Schedule A only those state taxes PAID IN 2005, no matter what year they were for. We run into problems with clients who pay their 4 estimates according to the date on the vouchers, and don't understand why we use what they paid to California in January 2005 FOR THE FOURTH PAYMENT FOR 2004, and don't use the 4th payment for 2005 made in January 2006. Withholding, on the other hand, is always paid within the calendar year. Nan, EA in LA << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| | |||
| |||
| quickcur[at]yahoo.com wrote: - quote - > I filed tax return extensions in April for both my Fed Tax
Maybe I don't understand your question, but I would think that you> Return and California Tax Return. I paid about $9000 for > California Tax at that time. Now I am working on filing the > return and found out that I need to pay about $11000 for > California Tax. > In this case, for 1040, should I use the Standard Deduction or > Itermized deduction? would use whichever gave you the best tax result (greater amount of deductions). Should be a no-brainer. - quote - > In Schedue A of 1040, for the state tax item,
You can only claim the actual amount of state tax or> should I put $9000, or $11000? withholding that you paid in 2005, regardless of your state tax liability. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I filed tax return extensions in April for both my Fed Tax Return and California Tax Return. I paid about $9000 for California Tax at that time. Now I am working on filing the return and found out that I need to pay about $11000 for California Tax. In this case, for 1040, should I use the Standard Deduction or Itermized deduction? In Schedue A of 1040, for the state tax item, should I put $9000, or $11000? Thank you very much. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| Tags |
| deduction, schedule, standard |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Standard deduction for dependents Frank S. Duke, Jr.: This was sent to me by a client and it seems to be on the level. The numbers are theoretical. Anybody see anything I am missing? Child age 13... | Taxes | 3 | 05-17-2004 10:44 PM | |
| Standard deduction sucks Joe-46er: I just spent hours filling out Schedule A. After I finished, TTax said the standard deduction of $9500 was larger than my itemized $8,000. What... | Taxes | 22 | 04-26-2004 03:09 AM | |
| Schedule C deduction for training? Brian Gordon: I'm getting into the insurance sales business. On one level, anyone can do it -- no "training" is involved. However, you must be licensed, and you... | Taxes | 2 | 02-03-2004 05:04 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |