|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Dan Lanciani wrote: .... - quote - > ... I assume they will not talk to me without some sort
Regarding the actual question can't really disagree strongly> of POA and it is unlikely that my mother can communicate > with them effectively. w/ other response because of the small amount although one could always call and ask for clarification. Key point here to me is the above almost "throwaway" comment --having just been through the situation with my mother, it is _imperative_ that you (or someone trustworthy and nearby) get a durable POA and healthcare and, hopefully, a living will executed by your mother. Otherwise, things will become complicated indeed and _may_ not proceed in a satisfactory manner. On the tax question, if you prepared the return, did you sign it as preparer? If so, you should have adequate authorization to discuss such an issue. If not, you probably should have ![]() << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > For less than $15.00, I wouldn't worry about it. If the
But can the state process it for less than $100?> Commonwealth is so desparate that it needs it back, it will > ask for it, and then you will laugh at them. The amount is > probably deminimus. -- This written advice was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer, for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer. (The foregoing legend has been affixed pursuant to U.S. Treasury Regulations governing tax practice.) <<< Benjamin Yazersky CPA [NJ & NY] > > ---> real address on hobokenx or hobokeni <--- << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| | |||
| |||
| Dan Lanciani wrote: - quote - > My mother today received an unexpected MA state tax refund
For less than $15.00, I wouldn't worry about it. If the> of $14.17. (This is--by no coincidence I assume--the amount > of MA taxes that she paid.) The notice that accompanied the > check said that the reason was: > LINE 26 - NO TAX STATUS DISALLOWED: INCOME EXCEEDS > QUALIFYING AMOUNT OR REFER TO WORKSHEET'' > I prepared the return and I agree that No Tax Status does > not apply. That's why I didn't check the NTS box on line > 26 and sent a payment of $14.17. Is it possible that> they have the message backwards and for some reason think > that NTS does apply? How much effort should I expend on > this? I assume they will not talk to me without some sort > of POA and it is unlikely that my mother can communicate > with them effectively. Commonwealth is so desparate that it needs it back, it will ask for it, and then you will laugh at them. The amount is probably deminimus. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| My mother today received an unexpected MA state tax refund of $14.17. (This is--by no coincidence I assume--the amount of MA taxes that she paid.) The notice that accompanied the check said that the reason was: LINE 26 - NO TAX STATUS DISALLOWED: INCOME EXCEEDS QUALIFYING AMOUNT OR REFER TO WORKSHEET'' I prepared the return and I agree that No Tax Status does not apply. That's why I didn't check the NTS box on line 26 and sent a payment of $14.17. Is it possible thatthey have the message backwards and for some reason think that NTS does apply? How much effort should I expend on this? I assume they will not talk to me without some sort of POA and it is unlikely that my mother can communicate with them effectively. Dan Lanciani ddl[at]danlan.*com << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| Tags |
| mother, refund, tax, unexpected |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Where is - Planning for the Unexpected in 2006? ac: I have looked all over the place but can not find what was referred to as "Planning for the Unexpected". I had that populated with all my info, now... | Microsoft Money | 8 | 07-24-2006 02:53 PM | |
| Help, 1099-LTC problem with IRS for elderly mother. Leor: My 76 year-old mother, who is chronically ill, is having a big problem w/the IRS. She has a Conseco LTC policy that she paid into for several... | Taxes | 4 | 11-24-2004 11:56 AM | |
| Help with mother's taxes Doug: My mother is 87 and can no longer do her taxes, due to mental health. I have a strong power of attorney for her financial affairs prepared by a... | Taxes | 11 | 08-19-2004 08:24 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |