|
#2
05-23-2006, 05:39 AM
| |||
| |||
 Re: The Kiddy Tax Ain't What It Used To Be William Brenner <wbrenner[at]nospamplease.net> wrote: - quote - > In case anyone missed it, a little advertised -- one wonders
Already some politicians are talking of new legislation to put> why -- provision of the recently passed and signed tax > "reduction" extension bill increases the "kiddy" tax age from > 14 to 17, retroactive to January 1, 2006. No new taxes? > From under 14 to under 18 --- or from 13 to 17 at year end. this back where it was. - quote - __ Art Kamlet ArtKamlet [at] AOL.com Columbus OH K2PZH << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#1
05-23-2006, 05:39 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: The Kiddy Tax Ain't What It Used To Be William Brenner wrote: - quote - > In case anyone missed it, a little advertised -- one wonders
Well actually that's good new instead of bad, as in "no new> why -- provision of the recently passed and signed tax > "reduction" extension bill increases the "kiddy" tax age from > 14 to 17, retroactive to January 1, 2006. No new taxes? > http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/21/wa...ton/21tax.html > OR: http://tinyurl.com/z6hl8 taxes." If my client's three young sons had had those stock sales this year instead of last, none of them would have had to pay the "kiddie tax". So then, good move! ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
05-23-2006, 05:39 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: The Kiddy Tax Ain't What It Used To Be William Brenner wrote: - quote - > In case anyone missed it, a little advertised -- one wonders
The subject has been discussed extensively on Fairmark. com> why -- provision of the recently passed and signed tax > "reduction" extension bill increases the "kiddy" tax age from > 14 to 17, retroactive to January 1, 2006. No new taxes? > http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/21/wa...ton/21tax.html > OR: http://tinyurl.com/z6hl8 << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#-1
05-21-2006, 07:21 PM
| |||
| |||
| The Kiddy Tax Ain't What It Used To Be In case anyone missed it, a little advertised -- one wonders why -- provision of the recently passed and signed tax "reduction" extension bill increases the "kiddy" tax age from 14 to 17, retroactive to January 1, 2006. No new taxes? http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/21/wa...ton/21tax.html OR: http://tinyurl.com/z6hl8 |
Linear Mode
