|
#8
| |||
| |||
| They typically get levy source information from 1099's or W-2's. They could have also gotten it from a Form 433-B he may have completed for them. Dick << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| "Dennis Ritchie" <dmr[at]bell-labs.com> wrote in - quote - > On Thursday, I got a fat, hand-addressed letter from the
Question 1:> local IRS SBSE Compliance office, and opened it with some > trepidation, which only increased when I saw the title: Notice > of Levy, and a bunch of rows for various years with a fat > total at the bottom. > Looking more closely, though, the Taxpayer involved is the > company owned by the guy who cuts my grass, so it appeared > that I was just being told, not levied myself. > So I called the IRS number listed, and immediately got the > woman there, who didn't seem surprised to hear from me. > Basically she said that I should send any payments direct to > IRS (actually USTreas). She sort of chuckled when I mentioned > that the last bill from Mike's Landscaping arrived in the same > mail. > Two things I should have asked and didn't: how did I get > involved (one guesses that they looked over Mike's deposited > checks), and whether all his customers got the same thing, or > whether they just picked me at random. > The bigger question is, is this a usual sort of thing? If I > were a bank I wouldn't be surprised, but my transactions with > him involved only a monthly bill, and no, I'm not in control > of any of his assets. Was the letter addressed to you personally (or your company) or to the landscaper's company? If not addressed to you, why did you open the letter? Question 2: I would guess you somewhere have the phone number of your landscraper, so why didn't you inform the IRS lady of that tidbit? Suggestion of a biochemist <chuckle> : 1. Send a certified letter to "the woman there" (you must have her name, right?), disclaiming any knowledge of the company she wants money from, and include both the address and the phone number of your landscraper. 2. Find another landscaper <grin> . -- Best regards Han email address is invalid << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Dennis Ritchie <dmr[at]bell-labs.com> wrote: - quote - > On Thursday, I got a fat, hand-addressed letter from the
Well, it seems like they are levying anything of his they> local IRS SBSE Compliance office, and opened it with some > trepidation, which only increased when I saw the title: Notice > of Levy, and a bunch of rows for various years with a fat > total at the bottom. > Looking more closely, though, the Taxpayer involved is the > company owned by the guy who cuts my grass, so it appeared > that I was just being told, not levied myself. > So I called the IRS number listed, and immediately got the > woman there, who didn't seem surprised to hear from me. > Basically she said that I should send any payments direct to > IRS (actually USTreas). She sort of chuckled when I mentioned > that the last bill from Mike's Landscaping arrived in the same > mail. > Two things I should have asked and didn't: how did I get > involved (one guesses that they looked over Mike's deposited > checks), and whether all his customers got the same thing, or > whether they just picked me at random. > The bigger question is, is this a usual sort of thing? If I > were a bank I wouldn't be surprised, but my transactions with > him involved only a monthly bill, and no, I'm not in control > of any of his assets. can get their hands on. He owes them taxes and interest and penalties, which by the time it gets to this point, far exceeds the actual tax he originally owed. And he has not come to an agreement with the IRS on a payment plan. He could have come up with a plan to pay his bill monthly for up to 5 years, but he didn't. By the time it gets to taking any money he has or will have, the amount due has grown quite large. If he were your employee, you would have been approached as an employer, and asked to send a percentage of his pay similar to a garnishment. But apparently he is an independent contractor, which helps explain why he is in tax trouble, and the IRS somehow found a list of his customers, so you received the equivalent of a garnishment notice. If you owe him money you have to pay it, though if you have any legal questions about your obligations here, check with an attorney in NJ, preferrably a tax attorney, but the IRS most likely has followed the law and is telling you to send your payment to them, not to him. You might ask how much longer he will continue to cut your grass if he isn't getting paid. Or maybe he is glad to be able to have his tax bill lowered via your payment. Or maybe not. As for how they found you, perhaps they asked him. Perhaps they asked his bank for copies of checks deposited to his account. At least it is the IRS asking for payment. The IRS recently authorized some accounts to be turned over to professional bill collection services. __ Art Kamlet ArtKamlet [at] AOL.com Columbus OH K2PZH << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| "Dennis Ritchie" <dmr[at]bell-labs.com> wrote: - quote - > On Thursday, I got a fat, hand-addressed letter from the
What you received is not unusual. IRS can and does levy> local IRS SBSE Compliance office, and opened it with some > trepidation, which only increased when I saw the title: Notice > of Levy, and a bunch of rows for various years with a fat > total at the bottom. > Looking more closely, though, the Taxpayer involved is the > company owned by the guy who cuts my grass, so it appeared > that I was just being told, not levied myself. > So I called the IRS number listed, and immediately got the > woman there, who didn't seem surprised to hear from me. > Basically she said that I should send any payments direct to > IRS (actually USTreas). She sort of chuckled when I mentioned > that the last bill from Mike's Landscaping arrived in the same > mail. > Two things I should have asked and didn't: how did I get > involved (one guesses that they looked over Mike's deposited > checks), and whether all his customers got the same thing, or > whether they just picked me at random. > The bigger question is, is this a usual sort of thing? If I > were a bank I wouldn't be surprised, but my transactions with > him involved only a monthly bill, and no, I'm not in control > of any of his assets. against the customers of businesses that owe back taxes. When a business is in this position, IRS will require them to list all of their customers, with addresses, etc., and, after applying the required procedures, send levies to those customers. You should look closely at what they sent you. Did they issue a levy against any assets you hold? Or are they levying against income? There is an important difference. If the levy is against any assets in your possession, you may not have to pay anything to IRS. Asset levies are effective only against assets in your possession at the time the levy is served on you. If the taxpayer's invoice had arrived by a subsequent mail delivery, the levy probably would no apply. Most likely, this is what the levy is. On the other hand, if the levy is against income, you have to pay IRS for any bills you receive from this taxpayer until IRS notifies you that their claim is satisfied. In short, levies against assets do not endure; levies against income do. Lanny K. Williams, CPA Nawarat, Williams & Co., Ltd. Income Tax Services for Expatriate Americans << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| "Dennis Ritchie" <dmr[at]bell-labs.com> wrote: - quote - > So I called the IRS number listed, and immediately got the
Had I been the one issuing the levies, every customer would> woman there, who didn't seem surprised to hear from me. > Basically she said that I should send any payments direct to > IRS (actually USTreas). She sort of chuckled when I mentioned > that the last bill from Mike's Landscaping arrived in the same > mail. > Two things I should have asked and didn't: how did I get > involved (one guesses that they looked over Mike's deposited > checks), and whether all his customers got the same thing, or > whether they just picked me at random. have gotten one, timed to coincide with Mike's billing cycle. - quote - > The bigger question is, is this a usual sort of thing? If I
Your account payable to him is one of his assets, and it's> were a bank I wouldn't be surprised, but my transactions with > him involved only a monthly bill, and no, I'm not in control > of any of his assets. subject to levy. This type of levy action is a lot more work than just cleaning out the bank account, so I guess that Mike changed banks (or decided to go to cash) after they cleaned him out the last time. I also guess that Mike is being less than forthcoming in his efforts to reach a mutually satisfactory resolution to the delinquency. -- Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Dennis Ritchie <dmr[at]bell-labs.com> wrote: - quote - > On Thursday, I got a fat, hand-addressed letter from the
Well, it seems like they are levying anything of his they> local IRS SBSE Compliance office, and opened it with some > trepidation, which only increased when I saw the title: Notice > of Levy, and a bunch of rows for various years with a fat > total at the bottom. > Looking more closely, though, the Taxpayer involved is the > company owned by the guy who cuts my grass, so it appeared > that I was just being told, not levied myself. > So I called the IRS number listed, and immediately got the > woman there, who didn't seem surprised to hear from me. > Basically she said that I should send any payments direct to > IRS (actually USTreas). She sort of chuckled when I mentioned > that the last bill from Mike's Landscaping arrived in the same > mail. > Two things I should have asked and didn't: how did I get > involved (one guesses that they looked over Mike's deposited > checks), and whether all his customers got the same thing, or > whether they just picked me at random. > The bigger question is, is this a usual sort of thing? If I > were a bank I wouldn't be surprised, but my transactions with > him involved only a monthly bill, and no, I'm not in control > of any of his assets. can get their hands on. He owes them taxes and interest and penalties, which by the time it gets to this point, far exceeds the actual tax he originally owed. And he has not come to an agreement with the IRS on a payment plan. He could have come up with a plan to pay his bill monthly for up to 5 years, but he didn't. By the time it gets to taking any money he has or will have, the amount due has grown quite large. If he were your employee, you would have been approached as an employer, and asked to send a percentage of his pay similar to a garnishment. But apparently he is an independent contractor, which helps explain why he is in tax trouble, and the IRS somehow found a list of his customers, so you received the equivalent of a garnishment notice. If you owe him money you have to pay it, though if you have any legal questions about your obligations here, check with an attorney in NJ, preferrably a tax attorney, but the IRS most likely has followed the law and is telling you to send your payment to them, not to him. You might ask how much longer he will continue to cut your grass if he isn't getting paid. Or maybe he is glad to be able to have his tax bill lowered via your payment. Or maybe not. As for how they found you, perhaps they asked him. Perhaps they asked his bank for copies of checks deposited to his account. At least it is the IRS asking for payment. The IRS recently authorized some accounts to be turned over to professional bill collection services. __ Art Kamlet ArtKamlet [at] AOL.com Columbus OH K2PZH << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "Dennis Ritchie" <dmr[at]bell-labs.com> wrote in - quote - > On Thursday, I got a fat, hand-addressed letter from the
Question 1:> local IRS SBSE Compliance office, and opened it with some > trepidation, which only increased when I saw the title: Notice > of Levy, and a bunch of rows for various years with a fat > total at the bottom. > Looking more closely, though, the Taxpayer involved is the > company owned by the guy who cuts my grass, so it appeared > that I was just being told, not levied myself. > So I called the IRS number listed, and immediately got the > woman there, who didn't seem surprised to hear from me. > Basically she said that I should send any payments direct to > IRS (actually USTreas). She sort of chuckled when I mentioned > that the last bill from Mike's Landscaping arrived in the same > mail. > Two things I should have asked and didn't: how did I get > involved (one guesses that they looked over Mike's deposited > checks), and whether all his customers got the same thing, or > whether they just picked me at random. > The bigger question is, is this a usual sort of thing? If I > were a bank I wouldn't be surprised, but my transactions with > him involved only a monthly bill, and no, I'm not in control > of any of his assets. Was the letter addressed to you personally (or your company) or to the landscaper's company? If not addressed to you, why did you open the letter? Question 2: I would guess you somewhere have the phone number of your landscraper, so why didn't you inform the IRS lady of that tidbit? Suggestion of a biochemist <chuckle> : 1. Send a certified letter to "the woman there" (you must have her name, right?), disclaiming any knowledge of the company she wants money from, and include both the address and the phone number of your landscraper. 2. Find another landscaper <grin> . -- Best regards Han email address is invalid << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "Dennis Ritchie" <dmr[at]bell-labs.com> wrote: - quote - > On Thursday, I got a fat, hand-addressed letter from the
What you received is not unusual. IRS can and does levy> local IRS SBSE Compliance office, and opened it with some > trepidation, which only increased when I saw the title: Notice > of Levy, and a bunch of rows for various years with a fat > total at the bottom. > Looking more closely, though, the Taxpayer involved is the > company owned by the guy who cuts my grass, so it appeared > that I was just being told, not levied myself. > So I called the IRS number listed, and immediately got the > woman there, who didn't seem surprised to hear from me. > Basically she said that I should send any payments direct to > IRS (actually USTreas). She sort of chuckled when I mentioned > that the last bill from Mike's Landscaping arrived in the same > mail. > Two things I should have asked and didn't: how did I get > involved (one guesses that they looked over Mike's deposited > checks), and whether all his customers got the same thing, or > whether they just picked me at random. > The bigger question is, is this a usual sort of thing? If I > were a bank I wouldn't be surprised, but my transactions with > him involved only a monthly bill, and no, I'm not in control > of any of his assets. against the customers of businesses that owe back taxes. When a business is in this position, IRS will require them to list all of their customers, with addresses, etc., and, after applying the required procedures, send levies to those customers. You should look closely at what they sent you. Did they issue a levy against any assets you hold? Or are they levying against income? There is an important difference. If the levy is against any assets in your possession, you may not have to pay anything to IRS. Asset levies are effective only against assets in your possession at the time the levy is served on you. If the taxpayer's invoice had arrived by a subsequent mail delivery, the levy probably would no apply. Most likely, this is what the levy is. On the other hand, if the levy is against income, you have to pay IRS for any bills you receive from this taxpayer until IRS notifies you that their claim is satisfied. In short, levies against assets do not endure; levies against income do. Lanny K. Williams, CPA Nawarat, Williams & Co., Ltd. Income Tax Services for Expatriate Americans << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| | |||
| |||
| "Dennis Ritchie" <dmr[at]bell-labs.com> wrote: - quote - > So I called the IRS number listed, and immediately got the
Had I been the one issuing the levies, every customer would> woman there, who didn't seem surprised to hear from me. > Basically she said that I should send any payments direct to > IRS (actually USTreas). She sort of chuckled when I mentioned > that the last bill from Mike's Landscaping arrived in the same > mail. > Two things I should have asked and didn't: how did I get > involved (one guesses that they looked over Mike's deposited > checks), and whether all his customers got the same thing, or > whether they just picked me at random. have gotten one, timed to coincide with Mike's billing cycle. - quote - > The bigger question is, is this a usual sort of thing? If I
Your account payable to him is one of his assets, and it's> were a bank I wouldn't be surprised, but my transactions with > him involved only a monthly bill, and no, I'm not in control > of any of his assets. subject to levy. This type of levy action is a lot more work than just cleaning out the bank account, so I guess that Mike changed banks (or decided to go to cash) after they cleaned him out the last time. I also guess that Mike is being less than forthcoming in his efforts to reach a mutually satisfactory resolution to the delinquency. -- Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| On Thursday, I got a fat, hand-addressed letter from the local IRS SBSE Compliance office, and opened it with some trepidation, which only increased when I saw the title: Notice of Levy, and a bunch of rows for various years with a fat total at the bottom. Looking more closely, though, the Taxpayer involved is the company owned by the guy who cuts my grass, so it appeared that I was just being told, not levied myself. So I called the IRS number listed, and immediately got the woman there, who didn't seem surprised to hear from me. Basically she said that I should send any payments direct to IRS (actually USTreas). She sort of chuckled when I mentioned that the last bill from Mike's Landscaping arrived in the same mail. Two things I should have asked and didn't: how did I get involved (one guesses that they looked over Mike's deposited checks), and whether all his customers got the same thing, or whether they just picked me at random. The bigger question is, is this a usual sort of thing? If I were a bank I wouldn't be surprised, but my transactions with him involved only a monthly bill, and no, I'm not in control of any of his assets. Dennis << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| Tags |
| interesting, irs, letter |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Who says Tax Court can't be interesting? Rich Carreiro: A gift vs. income case with, say, unusual facts :-) http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2006/04/tax_court_coupl.html -- Rich Carreiro ... | Taxes | 2 | 04-24-2006 02:35 PM | |
| An interesting case MTW: Check this out - the devious client vs. the careless (albeit conscientious) preparer: Sorenson vs. H&R Block (1st Cir. 2004) unpublished opinion... | Taxes | 3 | 08-27-2004 10:26 PM | |
| Interesting divorce situation HW \Skip\ Weldon: Couple in process of divorce. There is one child - a 12-year old son. Husband has created and is custodian of $25,000 mutual fund for son. (Is... | Taxes | 4 | 05-08-2004 11:36 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |