|
#8
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > The IRS does not want you to fill out the 2210. Let them
I had to go back and read the previous posts just to find> > send you a bill for any interest or penalties for which may > > be due. out to whom you are replying. Please don't snip that part. - quote - > Wrong. There are two ways of calculating the penalty: one
Well, partly "wrong" anyway. IRS doesn't care if you fill> very easy which the IRS uses, and the other using 2210/2210AI. > If your income is weighted toward the beginning of the year, > the simpler equal-quarter method results in lower penalties > and slower paying of taxes, because it assumes income is > evenly distrbuted through the year. it out or not. It is an option. What's amazing sometimes is the case where the client's return included the 2210 but IRS mails them one anyway! - quote - > The alternative annualization method works better for people
With today's software, a "lot more work" may entail an> who have income weighted later in the year, e.g. mutual fund > distribution and salespeople who close deals end of year. > But the tax forms take a lot more work. extra 5 to 8 minutes. But at least we get to charge for it. (grin) ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > The IRS does not want you to fill out the 2210. Let them
Wrong. There are two ways of calculating the penalty: one> send you a bill for any interest or penalties for which may > be due. very easy which the IRS uses, and the other using 2210/2210AI. If your income is weighted toward the beginning of the year, the simpler equal-quarter method results in lower penalties and slower paying of taxes, because it assumes income is evenly distrbuted through the year. The alternative annualization method works better for people who have income weighted later in the year, e.g. mutual fund distribution and salespeople who close deals end of year. But the tax forms take a lot more work. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| <nativecrafts[at]gmail.com> wrote: - quote - > Could someone please enlighten me on this form 2210 for year
Yes. You just haven't gotten deep enough into the form yet.> 2005, I am so confused! > Line 6 says "Withholding taxes. Do not include Estimated Tax > payments." > Line 4 says "Total tax due this year" > If the amount in line 6 - amount in line 4 is less than > $1000, no penalty assessed. > But I was surprised why we are not allowed to add estimated > tax paid in line 6? Isn't the purpose of estimates tax > payment to avoid underpayent penalty? Taxes withheld can automatically count as evenly made throughout the tax year, and the language above applies this test and checks whether no penalty is due. If you don't meet that test, then you usually must use the annualized method in which the exact amounts (withheld and estimated payments) are applied for each period. Steve << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Form 2210 is confusing the first time you use it because there is an intermediate step in their calculations where if Total Taxes minus only Withholding is less than $1,000, you don't owe a penalty ( that is you don't owe any installments in addition to your Withholding to avoid a penalty). If that figure, Taxes less Withholding, is more than $1,000, you continue on and the other calculations apply, such as if 90% of current year's tax and/or the amount of last years tax was paid with Withholding and/or 4 equal and on-time installments the Penalty (or lack of penalty) can be figured on the "short Method"). If your installments weren't on time, or equal, it goes on to figure your Penalty on the Regular Method (and you can apply the Withholding in the quarters withheld instead or "averaging" it over the 4 quarters). If your INCOME wasn't equal in the 4 "quarters", There is an optional method to figure your Penalty using the Annualized Income Method. ed << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| nativecrafts[at]gmail.com wrote: - quote - > Could someone please enlighten me on this form 2210 for year
The IRS does not want you to fill out the 2210. Let them> 2005, I am so confused! > Line 6 says "Withholding taxes. Do not include Estimated Tax > payments." > Line 4 says "Total tax due this year" > If the amount in line 6 - amount in line 4 is less than > $1000, no penalty assessed. > But I was surprised why we are not allowed to add estimated > tax paid in line 6? Isn't the purpose of estimates tax > payment to avoid underpayent penalty? send you a bill for any interest or penalties for which may be due. Just report what you sent in for estimates on the proper line on form 1040. Missy Doyle << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| <nativecrafts[at]gmail.com> wrote: - quote - > Could someone please enlighten me on this form 2210 for year
Yes. You just haven't gotten deep enough into the form yet.> 2005, I am so confused! > Line 6 says "Withholding taxes. Do not include Estimated Tax > payments." > Line 4 says "Total tax due this year" > If the amount in line 6 - amount in line 4 is less than > $1000, no penalty assessed. > But I was surprised why we are not allowed to add estimated > tax paid in line 6? Isn't the purpose of estimates tax > payment to avoid underpayent penalty? Taxes withheld can automatically count as evenly made throughout the tax year, and the language above applies this test and checks whether no penalty is due. If you don't meet that test, then you usually must use the annualized method in which the exact amounts (withheld and estimated payments) are applied for each period. Steve << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Form 2210 is confusing the first time you use it because there is an intermediate step in their calculations where if Total Taxes minus only Withholding is less than $1,000, you don't owe a penalty ( that is you don't owe any installments in addition to your Withholding to avoid a penalty). If that figure, Taxes less Withholding, is more than $1,000, you continue on and the other calculations apply, such as if 90% of current year's tax and/or the amount of last years tax was paid with Withholding and/or 4 equal and on-time installments the Penalty (or lack of penalty) can be figured on the "short Method"). If your installments weren't on time, or equal, it goes on to figure your Penalty on the Regular Method (and you can apply the Withholding in the quarters withheld instead or "averaging" it over the 4 quarters). If your INCOME wasn't equal in the 4 "quarters", There is an optional method to figure your Penalty using the Annualized Income Method. ed << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| nativecrafts[at]gmail.com wrote: - quote - > Could someone please enlighten me on this form 2210 for year
The IRS does not want you to fill out the 2210. Let them> 2005, I am so confused! > Line 6 says "Withholding taxes. Do not include Estimated Tax > payments." > Line 4 says "Total tax due this year" > If the amount in line 6 - amount in line 4 is less than > $1000, no penalty assessed. > But I was surprised why we are not allowed to add estimated > tax paid in line 6? Isn't the purpose of estimates tax > payment to avoid underpayent penalty? send you a bill for any interest or penalties for which may be due. Just report what you sent in for estimates on the proper line on form 1040. Missy Doyle << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| | |||
| |||
| nativecrafts[at]gmail.com wrote: - quote - > Could someone please enlighten me on this form 2210 for year
You didn't read the form far enough. All these lines do is> 2005, I am so confused! > Line 6 says "Withholding taxes. Do not include Estimated Tax > payments." > Line 4 says "Total tax due this year" > If the amount in line 6 - amount in line 4 is less than > $1000, no penalty assessed. > But I was surprised why we are not allowed to add estimated > tax paid in line 6? Isn't the purpose of estimates tax > payment to avoid underpayent penalty? calculate how much, if any, estimated tax payments were required. Further down the form you compare this amount with the actual estimated tax payments to see how much penalty, if any, is applicable. If the total of required payments, that is the actual tax less withholdings, is less than $1,000, there is no penalty. Lanny K. Williams, CPA Nawarat, Williams & Co., Ltd. Income Tax Services for Expatriate Americans << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Could someone please enlighten me on this form 2210 for year 2005, I am so confused! Line 6 says "Withholding taxes. Do not include Estimated Tax payments." Line 4 says "Total tax due this year" If the amount in line 6 - amount in line 4 is less than $1000, no penalty assessed. But I was surprised why we are not allowed to add estimated tax paid in line 6? Isn't the purpose of estimates tax payment to avoid underpayent penalty? << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| Tags |
| 2210, estimated, form, tax, underpayment |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Michigan penalty form 2210 Maggie: The Powers That Be who make the software used in the office I work at say that the minimum line 25 penalty on MI-2210 is $10 per quarter (total of... | Taxes | 1 | 03-08-2005 09:56 AM | |
| Cap. loss carryover: use in 2210 AI Stewart Rowe: Say I have a capital loss carryover of 15 from 2003. During 2004, capital gains in the four reporting periods were 4, 6, -2, and 20, for... | Taxes | 1 | 02-09-2005 02:20 AM | |
| Underpayment Penalty sftydvr: What is the proper method of avoiding an under payment of taxes penalty for a situation where the sale of a large asset occurred in the last part... | Taxes | 6 | 10-25-2003 09:34 PM | |
| underpayment tax penalty question Collean: I read that: The underpayment can also be avoided by prepaying through withholding and estimated tax payments an amount equal to 100% or more of... | Taxes | 1 | 09-26-2003 08:31 AM | |
| 2210 AI Question Stewart Rowe: My income, year-to-date, is about 75% dividends and 25% other income (interest, part of Social Security, etc.). In the absence of updated forms,... | Taxes | 4 | 09-10-2003 06:59 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |