|
#6
| |||
| |||
| That's just it. The extensions were mailed on time! Where they came up with the 22nd is beyond us. <G Some clients got the actual extension request form back and some did not. And one got a letter addressed to just the wife, postmarked and cancelled, but without an envelope. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > Here is a GOOD reason to also fill out that section about
(March 15th), and all 1040's filed on time (NO extensions!)> > "May the IRS contact... so and so about the return?" > We don't do that, but I certainly agree that it would be a > very good reason to do so. <G > > As for those not yet filed, just take a magic marker > > something like that, and change the year above to 2006. > We did that on the ones we did today and evern just went > online and did a few the other day using the 2006 form. > So, how was your tax season, Harlan? Ours was, > well....interesting. <G All in all very nice season. All 1120's filed on time First year for either. And what's more, no more 1120's this year, since I got rid of two corporate fiscal year clients this past December. Coasting the rest of the year. Unless y'all need some help up there. (grin) ChEAr$, Harlan << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| clj1219[at]bellsouth.net wrote: - quote - > correctly> > considering our recent problems with the IRS, that doesn't
(snipped.> make me feel any better. <G> Not related to the 941 forms, we sent in approximately 67 > corporate extensions on March 15. Since Friday around noon, > we have contacted (or been contacted by) about 60 of them to > discuss the notice they received in regards to late > extension requests. Seems as though the IRS thought the > extensions were mailed on March 22 instead of March 15 and > denied the requests. However, being an accounting practice, > we still had the receipt for mailing them. It was dated, of > all things, March 15! That is so interesting, because normally, IRS would not even notice the absence of a return until years later. Only reason they noticed the wrong date of March 22nd, was because they DID get the extensions. Sure makes you wonder. ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| <<The IRS should then deduce the error and process it correctly> considering our recent problems with the IRS, that doesn't make me feel any better. <G Not related to the 941 forms, we sent in approximately 67 corporate extensions on March 15. Since Friday around noon, we have contacted (or been contacted by) about 60 of them to discuss the notice they received in regards to late extension requests. Seems as though the IRS thought the extensions were mailed on March 22 instead of March 15 and denied the requests. However, being an accounting practice, we still had the receipt for mailing them. It was dated, of all things, March 15! Fortunately, the vast majority of our clients do make their tax deposits on time and they will match up to the amounts due each month. The only one or two who won't will be those who make the deposits with the 941. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > Here is a GOOD reason to also fill out that section about
We don't do that, but I certainly agree that it would be a> "May the IRS contact... so and so about the return?" very good reason to do so. <G - quote - > As for those not yet filed, just take a magic marker
We did that on the ones we did today and evern just went> something like that, and change the year above to 2006. online and did a few the other day using the 2006 form. So, how was your tax season, Harlan? Ours was, well....interesting. <G << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| clj1219[at]bellsouth.net wrote: - quote - > We use software to prepare our client's 941 forms. In all
Here is a GOOD reason to also fill out that section about> the rush of tax season we forgot to update the software. We > just noticed TODAY--April 21--that all the 941s we have done > so far have 2005 printed on them instead of 2006. > I have two questions. > Question one: if we are sending in these forms in April > 2006, is it really going to make a difference if the form > itself says 2005 if it says first quarter? > Question two: what would be our best way to correct this? > We estimate that about 30+ clients have already mailed in > their 941s. And a second part to that question would be if > we send a correction, could we send all of them together? "May the IRS contact... so and so about the return?" IF you did this, There's no harm in contacting the IRS practitioner hotline, outlining your problem to them, and ask them to contact you about it. Quite possible they can take corrective action there without any amendments. As for those not yet filed, just take a magic marker something like that, and change the year above to 2006. Good to hear from you again, Carol. ChEAr$, Harlan << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| | |||
| |||
| clj1219[at]bellsouth.net wrote: - quote - > We use software to prepare our client's 941 forms. In all
If IRS processes it as 2005, and if first quarter 2005> all the rush of tax season we forgot to update the software. > We just noticed TODAY--April 21--that all the 941s we have > done so far have 2005 printed on them instead of 2006. filed, it will reject. Then they analyze it. If the clients made deposit payments, they should match up between the return and the account for 1st quarter 2006. The IRS should then deduce the error and process it correctly. Beyond possible t/p contact, the only only scenario is their considering it an amended 2005, in which case a notice will go out. Then you contact IRS and ask them to fix it. Fred F. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| We use software to prepare our client's 941 forms. In all the rush of tax season we forgot to update the software. We just noticed TODAY--April 21--that all the 941s we have done so far have 2005 printed on them instead of 2006. I have two questions. Question one: if we are sending in these forms in April 2006, is it really going to make a difference if the form itself says 2005 if it says first quarter? Question two: what would be our best way to correct this? We estimate that about 30+ clients have already mailed in their 941s. And a second part to that question would be if we send a correction, could we send all of them together? << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| Tags |
| 941, correction |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |