|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Dick Adams <rdadams[at]smart.net> wrote: - quote - > Rich Carreiro <rlcarr[at]animato.arlington.ma.us> wrote:
In some states I imagine you can still sue for alienation of> > A gift vs. income case with, say, unusual facts :-) > Also www.tinyurl.com/pyk5f > This is interesting and humorous. Payment from a doctor to > his paramour's husband is income to the husband. > On what grounds was the husband going to sue? affection. - quote - > Reads more like extortion to me.
It could well be that, too. On the other hand the doc wasreported to the medical board in spite of the payment. So it's unlikely there was a threat to report him unless payment was made. - quote - > How gullible could this guy be to believe a doctor didn't
If the guy was so busy seducing his patients, maybe he> have the $150,000 he was going to sue him for? didn't have enough time to earn big bucks. Stu << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| | |||
| |||
| Rich Carreiro <rlcarr[at]animato.arlington.ma.us> wrote: - quote - > A gift vs. income case with, say, unusual facts :-)
Also www.tinyurl.com/pyk5f> http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_b...urt_coupl.html This is interesting and humorous. Payment from a doctor to his paramour's husband is income to the husband. On what grounds was the husband going to sue? Reads more like extortion to me. How gullible could this guy be to believe a doctor didn't have the $150,000 he was going to sue him for? << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| A gift vs. income case with, say, unusual facts :-) http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_b...urt_coupl.html -- Rich Carreiro rlcarr[at]animato.arlington.ma.us << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| Tags |
| court, interesting, tax |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Court Says CA LLC Fee is Unconstitutional Katie: A Superior Court judge in San Francisco has issued a proposed statement of decision holding that the California LLC fee, which is based on total... | Taxes | 8 | 03-23-2006 05:17 AM | |
| IRS vs Tax Court methods Ed: I'm studying the topic of vacation home rentals. I would like to find more information regarding the advantages and disadvantages of the IRS... | Taxes | 2 | 10-23-2005 04:35 PM | |
| Supreme Court Rules For IRS William Brenner: On Monday, January 24, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of the IRS position that monetary legal awards must be considered income to the... | Taxes | 26 | 02-07-2005 04:03 PM | |
| Tax Court briefs Tim in Los Angeles: A case in which I was formerly involved has been appealed to the US Tax Court. The petition is to review the the reporting position I took in... | Taxes | 4 | 04-13-2004 08:35 AM | |
| US Tax Court--Simple Motion? Michael A.: Case is on regular calendar for October. Clients cannot afford extra costs (i.e., briefs, formal rules of evidence, increased Stip. burden, etc.)... | Taxes | 3 | 07-27-2003 06:58 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |