|
#2
| |||
| |||
| michael[at]vfrworld.com wrote: - quote - > I'm using TurboTax. I lived in Arizona for the first half
Was all of this salary from the same employer? If so, the> of 2005, and then moved to California for the second half. > The move was job-related, and resulted in a significant > salary increase. When I plug this information into > TurboTax, the way it's being calculated is to take my entire > 2005 income, and divide it by 50%, and applies that amount > as my taxable income for Arizona. However, with the salary > increase, the portion of income earned in Arizona was more > like 30%. > Can anyone tell me how this is supposed to be calculated? earnings pre- and post-move should be shown as AZ and CA source respectively at the bottom of the W-2, along with the amount withheld for each state. If two employers were involved, each would have entered the state taxable income and the amount withheld for the state in the same area on the W-2. Turbo Tax provides space to enter the amount that is attributed to each state on the W-2 on the screen on which you enter W-2 information. Each state can tax only the amount of income that was earned in that state, or while a resident of that state. Katie in San Diego << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| When you enter your W-2s into TurboTax, you have to designate which state the money was earned in (you did do this, didn't you) under state earnings. Then when you allocate income for each state tax return, it should apportion it correctly. Interest and dividend income is likely split 50/50, but you should also be able to allocate this differently if you need to. Dennis << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| | |||
| |||
| <michael[at]vfrworld.com> wrote: - quote - > I'm using TurboTax. I lived in Arizona for the first half
It sounds like GIGO, but it's hard to tell for sure from the> of 2005, and then moved to California for the second half. > The move was job-related, and resulted in a significant > salary increase. When I plug this information into > TurboTax, the way it's being calculated is to take my entire > 2005 income, and divide it by 50%, and applies that amount > as my taxable income for Arizona. However, with the salary > increase, the portion of income earned in Arizona was more > like 30%. > Can anyone tell me how this is supposed to be calculated? information provided. Isn't there an allocation form in there somewhere on which you indicate what income is attributable to what state? -- Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I'm using TurboTax. I lived in Arizona for the first half of 2005, and then moved to California for the second half. The move was job-related, and resulted in a significant salary increase. When I plug this information into TurboTax, the way it's being calculated is to take my entire 2005 income, and divide it by 50%, and applies that amount as my taxable income for Arizona. However, with the salary increase, the portion of income earned in Arizona was more like 30%. Can anyone tell me how this is supposed to be calculated? << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| Tags |
| partyear, resident |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Non-resident vs. Part-year Resident Victor Roberts: I am confused about the definition of "resident" for income tax purposes. I thought you could only be a resident of one state at a time, even... | Taxes | 5 | 03-13-2005 11:34 PM | |
| NJ and CO part-year returns Vic Dura: I'm an Alabama resident and I need to file tax returns for my mother in law. She was a full-time resident of NJ for sixty years until 11/03 when... | Taxes | 3 | 02-06-2004 10:16 AM | |
| NY State Tax : Resident or Part YearResident dilemma. Sannasi: During the tax year 2001, I worked both in VA and NY. Since I lived more than 183 days in VA, I am very clear that I need to file VA state resident... | Taxes | 3 | 01-04-2004 11:21 PM | |
| Business Use of Home for Part of Year Judy: I had a home-based business for the first 80% of last year. In calculating Expenses for Business Use of Your Home, do I enter 80% of the actual... | Taxes | 1 | 07-28-2003 03:28 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |