|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "berry" <berry[at]ix.netcom.com> wrote in message news:lk5o22peh2doeaq82h8tk3ur1t1omuuq1r[at]4ax.com... - quote - > We have a Bypass Trust incorporated in our Will. We are over 70 and I
It's not totally clear what your situation is. I THINK you are asking if you> feel we don't need that Trust and wouldn't fund it. IRA would pass > outside the will - spouses IRA - which would be rolled over to me then > go to grown children on both our demise. > 2 small ins. policies have beneficiaries. Me first, then grown > children on both our demise. A monthly pension is at 50/50 > and would stay the same, if spouse died. Under these circumstances, > and well below the estate tax limit ------------should we keep the > Will as is (not funding it upon spouse's demise) or do another one > without the Bypass Trust? Seems like everything we have is > covered without a Trust. Only other thing - is a paid off house > which I would continue to live in - if spouse died. (Titled jointly - > both our names.) This is TX. STILL need a bypass trust since the estate tax exemption amount grew from $600,000 in 1997 to $2M today. So you could leave your assets to your wife then she can leave stuff to your kids. Unfortunately, my father in law thought the same thing in 1991 just before he died. The good news is that his small nest egg grew exponentially during the 1990s bull market. By the time my mother-in-law died 8 years later, a big estate tax was owed. If dad had split his assets....even though it saved no taxes at his death, the FUTURE GROWTH would have been outside my motherinlaws estate and he would not be rolling over in his grave over how much tax had to be paid upon her death. In other words, consider the long term picture; not just how much tax might be paid, or not, at the death of the first spouse. Keep your bypass trust. |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| berry[at]ix.netcom.com (berry) wrote: - quote - > We have a Bypass Trust incorporated in our Will.
If it's incorporated into your Will, it means that your estate willhave to go to probate. That kind of a trust does not avoid it. - quote - > We are over 70
Not quite. If the IRA passes outside the will but the money is not> and I feel we don't need that Trust and wouldn't fund it. IRA > would pass outside the will - spouses IRA - which would be > rolled over to me then go to grown children on both our demise. > 2 small ins. policies have beneficiaries. Me first, then grown > children on both our demise. A monthly pension is at 50/50 > and would stay the same, if spouse died. Under these > circumstances, and well below the estate tax limit > ------------should we keep the Will as is (not funding it upon > spouse's demise) or do another one without the Bypass Trust? > Seems like everything we have is covered without a Trust. Only > other thing - is a paid off house which I would continue to live > in - if spouse died. (Titled jointly - both our names.) retained in the IRA, it will be required to go through probate on the death of the second spouse. Sane thing with insurance policies and any other money left in your bank accounts. As far as the real estate, that's the biggest reason to have a trust. Since Texas is a community property state, if it is community property as opposed to joint tenancy, it gets a full stepped up basis when one of you dies. As joint tenancy property it may only get a half stepped up basis. That means that if one of you dies and the other wants to sell to move into a smaller place, for example, your income taxes may be higher as joint tenancy property than if it is in a trust and held as community property. In addition, when the second one dies, the property will then have to go through probate. Or it could then be place into joint tenancy with the kids. But again, if it passes as joint tenancy property the income taxes will be higher when it is eventually sold. Plus there is the problem that, if you make your kids joint tenants, they become legal owners of the property. That means you won't be able to sell without their consent. You will not even be able to refinance without their consent. And if one of them gets into financial trouble, their creditors could conceivably force the sale of the house to pay their bills. In other words, it's best not to pass property by joint tenancy. As far as the trust, your kids will be much better off if you use one. But don't have one as part of your Will. Have one that is separate from your Will, that becomes the legal owner of all your property right now, while you are still alive. That will avoid probate. Your current trust won't. Stu |
| | |||
| |||
| "berry" <berry[at]ix.netcom.com> wrote in message news:[at]4ax.com... - quote - > We have a Bypass Trust incorporated in our Will. We are over 70 and I
The only problem may be when the surviving spouse dies. It is> feel we don't need that Trust and wouldn't fund it. IRA would pass > outside the will - spouses IRA - which would be rolled over to me then > go to grown children on both our demise. > 2 small ins. policies have beneficiaries. Me first, then grown > children on both our demise. A monthly pension is at 50/50 > and would stay the same, if spouse died. Under these circumstances, > and well below the estate tax limit ------------should we keep the > Will as is (not funding it upon spouse's demise) or do another one > without the Bypass Trust? Seems like everything we have is > covered without a Trust. Only other thing - is a paid off house > which I would continue to live in - if spouse died. (Titled jointly - > both our names.) This is TX. > Thanks for any ideas. (Will was written in l997) possible with proper titling to avoid probate and pass real estate and other assets to the children. If your children are the executor and and at least one lives in Texas then the trust/no trust may not make a difference. But if your real estate has appreciated more than $500,000 you should definitely see a lawyer about retitling or using the trust. |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| We have a Bypass Trust incorporated in our Will. We are over 70 and I feel we don't need that Trust and wouldn't fund it. IRA would pass outside the will - spouses IRA - which would be rolled over to me then go to grown children on both our demise. 2 small ins. policies have beneficiaries. Me first, then grown children on both our demise. A monthly pension is at 50/50 and would stay the same, if spouse died. Under these circumstances, and well below the estate tax limit ------------should we keep the Will as is (not funding it upon spouse's demise) or do another one without the Bypass Trust? Seems like everything we have is covered without a Trust. Only other thing - is a paid off house which I would continue to live in - if spouse died. (Titled jointly - both our names.) This is TX. Thanks for any ideas. (Will was written in l997) |
| Tags |
| bypass, needed, trust |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| any way to bypass 'sign in' and just work offline by default? PWalker: Hi, Im using Money 2006. would anyone know any way to bypass the 'sign in' page when you start up Money 2006, so it just works offline by... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 09-17-2005 07:11 PM | |
| Funding a bypass trust MTW: Clients are an elderly couple. One of them is expected to pass away shortly. The family is now considering how to fund the bypass trust called for... | Taxes | 3 | 10-11-2004 03:42 AM | |
| Credit Trust / Marital Trust simplified question Raymond: John Doe dies leaving a 3 million dollar estate. His trust calls for a pecuniary formula distribution to a credit trust equal to the Federal estate... | Taxes | 4 | 01-28-2004 04:48 PM | |
| How to bust a bypass trust... Michael T Wing CPA: Client died a few years ago. His will called for the typical "A-B" trust arrangement and thus his share of the estate (roughly $500,000) was placed... | Taxes | 28 | 01-27-2004 09:18 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |