| | |||
| |||
| Steve Braun wrote: - quote - > After dropping two 50 foot branches in a severe storm, I
I noticed this post was getting a little stale.> chose to have a 100 foot Eucalyptus tree removed. When > taking it down we discovered it had been damaged by > lightening. The arborist concluded that the previous > lightening damage was responsible for weakening the tree. My > costs for tree removal were $3000, property damage caused by > falling branches was another $700. I received $1700 from my > insurance company. Can I claim a $2000 loss on this? Or can > I claim the decrease in my property value caused by the loss > of the tree (minus what I received from the insurance > settlement)? I don't believe you have a deductible loss relating to the tree removal. The identifiable event that meets the definition of a casualty is the sudden falling of the two 50' branches during the storm. The tree itself appears to have been damaged some time ago by a lightening strike and has probably been suffering progressive deterioration (not a deductible event). I don't think you can tie the removal of the tree to the current identifiable event of the storm. The next question to be asked is whether the tree removal can be construed to be a capital improvement to the property and thus an increase to your cost basis. Based on the facts presented, that does not appear to be the case. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| After dropping two 50 foot branches in a severe storm, I chose to have a 100 foot Eucalyptus tree removed. When taking it down we discovered it had been damaged by lightening. The arborist concluded that the previous lightening damage was responsible for weakening the tree. My costs for tree removal were $3000, property damage caused by falling branches was another $700. I received $1700 from my insurance company. Can I claim a $2000 loss on this? Or can I claim the decrease in my property value caused by the loss of the tree (minus what I received from the insurance settlement)? Thanks << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| Tags |
| loss, storm |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Estate 1041 - Business loss vs. investment loss John Smith: The estate sold my late mother's NYC coop, which was her personal residence, and incurred about a 18K loss. It sold at the appraised FMV, but there... | Taxes | 2 | 02-13-2005 10:53 PM | |
| Storm losses trees, etc. value estimate Frederick Jorden: Hurricane Isabel caused significant losses by cutting a swath of trees throughout Virginia. I have been looking for some simple rules of thumb to... | Taxes | 4 | 02-13-2004 04:00 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |