|
#7
| |||
| |||
| "Cherrybounce" <chdavi15[at]hotmail.com> wrote: - quote - > I have a building that is on the books for $115,000, land of
Uh...no. You got more than you paid for it, did you not?> $14,000, accumulated depreciation of 14,711, accumulated > amortization of $2,300, and a mortgage due on the building > of $90,000. > I sold the building for $240,000, less the mortgage, which > they assumed. (in other words, I netted $150,000). I had > $10,000 in commissions. > Is this a loss? -- David M. Woods, EA, ChFC, CLU Woods Financial Services Norwood, MA 02062 www.woods-financial.com << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Cherrybounce wrote: - quote - > I have a building that is on the books for $115,000, land of
Question; To what does the amortization pertain? You> $14,000, accumulated depreciation of 14,711, accumulated > amortization of $2,300, and a mortgage due on the building > of $90,000. mentioned the building and land, but no improvements. ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA Sat 4 Feb 2006 18;47 << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| "Cherrybounce" <chdavi15[at]hotmail.com> writes: - quote - > I have a building that is on the books for $115,000, land of
No, it's not. First, the mortgage is irrelevant. All that> $14,000, accumulated depreciation of 14,711, accumulated > amortization of $2,300, and a mortgage due on the building > of $90,000. > I sold the building for $240,000, less the mortgage, which > they assumed. (in other words, I netted $150,000). I had > $10,000 in commissions. > Is this a loss? matters is what you sold the property for, what you paid for the property, and adjustments like commission and depreciation. So if by "on the books for $115,000" you mean that was your cost (as things like that are generally carried on the books at cost), your unadjusted basis in the property is $129,000. But that you have to adjust for depreciation and amortization which will bring your basis down by $14,711 + $2,300, reducing it to $111,989. Then you sold for $240,000 less a $10,000 commission for net proceeds of $230,000. Subtracting $111,989 from $230,000 results in a gain of $118,011. $101,000 of that will be a normal capital gain. The rest of it will likely be ordinary income from the depreciation recapture or may be special 25% rate capital gain depending on whether or not you used accelerated depreciation. I will leave it to my betters to discuss that exact breakdown :-). -- Rich Carreiro rlcarr[at]animato.arlington.ma.us << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Cherrybounce wrote: - quote - > I have a building that is on the books for $115,000, land of
No, let's do the math:> $14,000, accumulated depreciation of 14,711, accumulated > amortization of $2,300, and a mortgage due on the building > of $90,000. > I sold the building for $240,000, less the mortgage, which > they assumed. (in other words, I netted $150,000). I had > $10,000 in commissions. > Is this a loss? Calculate your "cost basis" as ($115,000 + 14,000 - 14711 - 2,300) = $111,989 Calculate your net sales price as ($240,000 - 10,000) = $230,000 $230,000 - 111,989 = $119,011 capital GAIN. Your mortgage has NOTHING to do with any calculations of gain or loss. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| "Cherrybounce" <chdavi15[at]hotmail.com> wrote: - quote - > I have a building that is on the books for $115,000, land of
First the easy parts. The commission is a valid expense of> $14,000, accumulated depreciation of 14,711, accumulated > amortization of $2,300, and a mortgage due on the building > of $90,000. > I sold the building for $240,000, less the mortgage, which > they assumed. (in other words, I netted $150,000). I had > $10,000 in commissions. sale, and ignore everything about the mortgage. The mortgage is irrelevant in determining your gain or loss. What matters is your "basis," and it's impossible to tell from the information provided. See IRS Publications 550 and 551. -- Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Cherrybounce wrote: - quote - > I have a building that is on the books for $115,000, land of
Proceeds = $240,000 - 10,000 = $230,000> $14,000, accumulated depreciation of 14,711, accumulated > amortization of $2,300, and a mortgage due on the building > of $90,000. > I sold the building for $240,000, less the mortgage, which > they assumed. (in other words, I netted $150,000). I had > $10,000 in commissions. > Is this a loss? > From your facts -- Basis = $115,000 + 14,000 - 14,711 - 2,300 = $111,989 Realized Gain = $230,000 - 111,989 = $118,011 The mortgage is irrelevant to the computation of taxable gain. Also, I assume that $115,000 is what you paid for the building. If not, change that amount about and redo the computations. Good luck. Bill << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Cherrybounce <chdavi15[at]hotmail.com> wrote: - quote - > I have a building that is on the books for $115,000, land of
If I understand right, you bought the building + land for> $14,000, accumulated depreciation of 14,711, accumulated > amortization of $2,300, and a mortgage due on the building > of $90,000. $143,711, with a mortgage of $92,300. Since then, you have depreciated the building $14,711, and amortized $2300 on the mortgage. I'll note that the mortgage is irrelevant in calculating gain or loss. - quote - > I sold the building for $240,000, less the mortgage, which
You sold the building + land for $230,000 net (the> they assumed. (in other words, I netted $150,000). I had > $10,000 in commissions. commission came off your proceeds). You recapture $14,711 in depreciation, and show a gain (in addition to that) of 86,289. - quote - > Is this a loss?
I should have such losses.Seth << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| | |||
| |||
| "Cherrybounce" <chdavi15[at]hotmail.com> wrote: - quote - > I have a building that is on the books for $115,000, land of
Let's see: $115,000 + $14,000 - $14,711 = $114,289> $14,000, accumulated depreciation of 14,711, accumulated > amortization of $2,300, and a mortgage due on the building > of $90,000. - quote - > I sold the building for $240,000, less the mortgage, which
Continuing: $240,000 - $ 10,000 = $230,000> they assumed. (in other words, I netted $150,000). I had > $10,000 in commissions. > Is this a loss? $230,000 - $114.289 = $115,711 There isn't enough information to determine whether the accoumulated amortization is a debit or a credit. So your CAPITAL GAIN is $115,711 +/- $2,300. The mortgage is irrelevant. You bought a building w/land for $129,000, deducted $14,711 from your income as depreciation, and sold it for $230,000 (net). Plus it looks like you only held it for 2-3 years and you only paid 4.125% commission (nice job). And you want to call it a loss? Dick << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I have a building that is on the books for $115,000, land of $14,000, accumulated depreciation of 14,711, accumulated amortization of $2,300, and a mortgage due on the building of $90,000. I sold the building for $240,000, less the mortgage, which they assumed. (in other words, I netted $150,000). I had $10,000 in commissions. Is this a loss? << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| Tags |
| loss, sale |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Limit on loss of sale of house? Jeff Traigle: I'm in the process of searching for new employment in a warmer climate and am trying to do some tax planning for the coming year. My house in... | Taxes | 11 | 02-21-2005 07:25 AM | |
| When Should a Loss on Sale of Stock Be Taken? Al Smith: In October of 1987 I paid $3,850 for shares of a Canadian gold mining company. They never paid a dividend, and I had forgotten about the stock. ... | Taxes | 14 | 10-19-2004 02:49 PM | |
| Loss from sale of home JoshNYC: I am familiar with the rules for cap. gains from the sale of a home. Is anyone familiar with the rules surrounding losses? <<... | Taxes | 12 | 01-05-2004 01:21 AM | |
| How To Take Property Sale Loss Lisa: I am in escrow to sell a piece of bare land that I inherited in 2000. The value of the land when my mother died was $30,000 on the 706. I am... | Taxes | 2 | 11-17-2003 09:25 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |