| | |||
| |||
| "Wayne Rivers" <wayne[at]wayneriverscpa.com> wrote: - quote - > A taxpayer receives a W2 without the statutory employee box
How about just doing so? Unless the law requires the box on> checked, but falls under the full-time life insurance > salesman qualification under the IRS code. She has talked > to other people that work for the same company and they > report their income on Schedule C (without the box checked). > She has talked to her HR department and they will not > change the W2. > What does she need to do on her return so that she can > report the income and expenses on Schedule C instead of > miscellaneous itemized deductions on Schedule A? the W-2 to be checked, if she meets the qualifications, ignore the incorrect W-2. This advice is usually met with, "But won't the IRS....?" They may, in which case you explain. Trust me, it won't be the first incorrect W-2 they've ever seen. -- Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I never thought I'd run into this one- A taxpayer receives a W2 without the statutory employee box checked, but falls under the full-time life insurance salesman qualification under the IRS code. She has talked to other people that work for the same company and they report their income on Schedule C (without the box checked). She has talked to her HR department and they will not change the W2. What does she need to do on her return so that she can report the income and expenses on Schedule C instead of miscellaneous itemized deductions on Schedule A? Thanks Wayne Rivers, CPA << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| Tags |
| employee, statutory |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Help! non-employee 1099MISC for_idea: Hi, friends, Last year, I worked for a small company. They gave me some payment for my work. later, they gave me a 1099MISC form. They put the... | Taxes | 4 | 04-12-2005 10:11 PM | |
| Employee car expenses purirb123@yahoo.com: I drive my car for company's work. My company does not pay me for this. Can I deduct this as an employee business expense even though I am a W2... | Taxes | 2 | 04-11-2005 06:13 PM | |
| Re: IC or statutory employee?; implications for 1040 DFStoneJr: It's not a homework assignment. Honest. I just used the hypothetical format I became familiar with in grad school 19 years ago; I also figured it... | Taxes | 19 | 04-26-2004 03:09 AM | |
| Re: IC or statutory employee?; implications for 1040 Phoebe Roberts, EA: DFStoneJr wrote: > 1) Is Joe a statutory employee or a legitimate independent > contractor? You know, I have been puzzling and puzzling over... | Taxes | 2 | 04-12-2004 09:16 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |