Go Back   CDN Business Directory > Main Category > Taxes

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #3  
Old 02-04-2006, 03:15 AM
A.G. Kalman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Regulation 301.6501(c)-1

bm30003700[at]aol.com wrote:

- quote -

> I am reading a copy of this regulation. After
> 301.6501(c)-1(e), the next paragraph is numbered (2) and
> subsequent numbering seems to imply that the "(2)" means
> "301.6501(c)-1(e)(2)".
> However, there does not seem to be a paragraph
> "301.6501(c)-1(e)(1)". Is this because a paragraph was
> deleted when regulation became final?
> Sorry to ask what may be an obvious question, but I really
> don't understand how this works.


My book of final and temporary regs has 301.6501(c)-1(e)(1)

(e) Gifts subject to chapter 14 of the Internal Revenue Code
not adequately disclosed on the return.

(1) IN GENERAL.

If any transfer of property subject to the special valuation
rules of section 2701 or section 2702, or if the occurrence
of any taxable event described in section 25.2701-4 of this
chapter, is not adequately shown on a return of tax imposed
by chapter 12 of subtitle B of the Internal Revenue Code
(without regard to section 2503(b)), any tax imposed by
chapter 12 of subtitle B of the Code on the transfer or
resulting from the taxable event may be assessed, or a
proceeding in court for the collection of the appropriate
tax may be begun without assessment, at any time.

<< ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== >
  #2  
Old 02-04-2006, 02:37 AM
bm30003700@aol.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Regulation 301.6501(c)-1

After posting this message, I found out that the copy of
regulation I was reading erred in not putting (1) in the
paragraph preceding (2). Moral of the story; don't trust
everything you pull from the internet!

Anyway, thanks!

<< ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== >
  #1  
Old 02-04-2006, 02:18 AM
Stuart A. Bronstein
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Regulation 301.6501(c)-1

"bm30003700[at]aol.com" <bm30003700[at]aol.com> wrote:

- quote -

> I am reading a copy of this regulation. After
> 301.6501(c)-1(e), the next paragraph is numbered (2) and
> subsequent numbering seems to imply that the "(2)" means
> "301.6501(c)-1(e)(2)".
> However, there does not seem to be a paragraph
> "301.6501(c)-1(e)(1)". Is this because a paragraph was
> deleted when regulation became final?


By the way it reads, they just forgot to label the
first paragraph properly. What you are reading as
301.6501(c)-1(e) is really 301.6501(c)-1(e)(1).

Stu

<< ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== >
 
Old 02-04-2006, 02:18 AM
cballard@tyyni.net
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Regulation 301.6501(c)-1

bm30003700[at]aol.com wrote:

- quote -

> I am reading a copy of this regulation. After
> 301.6501(c)-1(e), the next paragraph is numbered (2) and
> subsequent numbering seems to imply that the "(2)" means
> "301.6501(c)-1(e)(2)".
> However, there does not seem to be a paragraph
> "301.6501(c)-1(e)(1)". Is this because a paragraph was
> deleted when regulation became final?


Depending on what source you are using to look at the
regulations, sometimes the reference to sub-subparagrah (1)
is tucked up against the reference to subparagraph (e).
It's easy to overlook. Here is the text of the two sections
you are looking at:

301.6501(c)-1(e)(1):

In general. If any transfer of property subject to the
special valuation rules of section 2701 or section 2702, or
if the occurrence of any taxable event described in section
25.2701-4 of this chapter, is not adequately shown on a
return of tax imposed by chapter 12 of subtitle B of the
Internal Revenue Code (without regard to section 2503(b)),
any tax imposed by chapter 12 of subtitle B of the Code on
the transfer or resulting from the taxable event may be
assessed, or a proceeding in court for the collection of the
appropriate tax may be begun without assessment, at any
time.

301.6501(c)-1(e)(2)

Adequately shown. A transfer of property valued under the
rules of section 2701 or section 2702 or any taxable event
described in 25.2701-4 of this chapter will be considered
adequately shown on a return of tax imposed by chapter 12 of
subtitle B of the Internal Revenue Code only if, with
respect to the entire transaction of series of transactions
(including any transaction that affected the transferred
interest) of which the transfer (or taxable event) was a
part, the return provides: etc. etc.

<< ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== >
  #-1  
Old 02-03-2006, 07:07 AM
bm30003700@aol.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Regulation 301.6501(c)-1

I am reading a copy of this regulation. After
301.6501(c)-1(e), the next paragraph is numbered (2) and
subsequent numbering seems to imply that the "(2)" means
"301.6501(c)-1(e)(2)".

However, there does not seem to be a paragraph
"301.6501(c)-1(e)(1)". Is this because a paragraph was
deleted when regulation became final?

Sorry to ask what may be an obvious question, but I really
don't understand how this works.

Thanks

<< ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== >
 

Tags
regulation
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
Basic explaination of Treasury Regulation 1.704-1(b)
iloadmin: I am a newbie in legal terminology as it relates to Treasury Regulations. Can someone give a clear and simple explanation of Treasury Regulation...
Taxes 1 02-25-2004 02:45 PM



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:16 PM.