| | |||
| |||
| "James Lewis" <jmpj[at]verizon.net> wrote - quote - > A C-corp and an S-Corp jointly bought new computer hardware
Don't have to cite anything. "The invoice was issued in the> for catastrophe recovery purposes as required by mutual > clients costing $200,000 which is the only assets purchased > by either company. Common shareholders own 67% of the C-Corp > and 100% of the S-Corp. The invoice was issued in the name > of the S-Corp to avoid the extra paperwork involved in > financing the purchase and the C-corp pays the S-corp half > the monthly payment. > Can both companies take a $100k Section 179 deduction? If > not, please cite the code/reg/case/etc. prohibiting such a > position. name of the S-Corp" means that the "S" corp OWNS the asset and they are the only one who can depreciate it and the only ones who can take Section 179. Now, if there is a legal document that shows the "sale" of a partial interest in the machine, then you have half a chance for the C corp to claim Section 179 and/or regular depreciation. -- Paul Thomas, CPA paulthomascpapc[at]bellsouth.net << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| A C-corp and an S-Corp jointly bought new computer hardware for catastrophe recovery purposes as required by mutual clients costing $200,000 which is the only assets purchased by either company. Common shareholders own 67% of the C-Corp and 100% of the S-Corp. The invoice was issued in the name of the S-Corp to avoid the extra paperwork involved in financing the purchase and the C-corp pays the S-corp half the monthly payment. Can both companies take a $100k Section 179 deduction? If not, please cite the code/reg/case/etc. prohibiting such a position. Mike << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| Tags |
| asset, coowned, deduction, s179 |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| CAN NOT SELL ALREADY OWNED STOCKS DSM: I have Microsoft Money 2005 Premium, version 14.0.125.1105. One of my stocks changed its ticker name. I deleted the entry and started entering the... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 09-29-2006 01:01 PM | |
| SE Tax on Family Owned Business Marie Murrell: I purchased several oil and gas working interests in 1999. I used joint funds (my husband and mine) and had the division orders titled in mine and... | Taxes | 3 | 08-17-2004 03:48 PM | |
| Home Sale - Owned less than 2 yrs Al Bundy: Have a case where guy sold his home after 22 mos ownership. Believed that the home repurchase within 2 years thing was still the guideline for... | Taxes | 3 | 02-15-2004 05:39 AM | |
| Woman-owned businesses Lorton: My wife and I run a business at 50% each of ownership. If we change our ownership to show her owning 51%, is this all it takes to make us qualify... | Taxes | 5 | 07-18-2003 07:24 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |