|
#2
| |||
| |||
| <menawach[at]msn.com> wrote: - quote - > The IRS pubs state that depreciable property, among other
For several clients, I have a "write-in" line item for> criteria, must be expected to last more than one year. Some > small tools are relatively inexpensive but can last more > than one year. Is it proper to list these small, > inexpensive items under supplies or do I have list all of > them individually on Form 4562 even if they cost less than a > dollar. It would make it so much easier if there were a > dollar minimum. schedule C labled as small tools, and I expense them. You could put them on 4562 and take Sec 179 and achieve the same results as long as the qualify for the Sec 179 deduction. They'll then get lost or destroyed and you'll have to take them off the 4562 with no gain or loss. It just seems like a bunch of work to achieve the same results. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| <menawach[at]msn.com> wrote - quote - > The IRS pubs state that depreciable property, among other
There isn't one in the Code, but the business entity can> criteria, must be expected to last more than one year. Some > small tools are relatively inexpensive but can last more > than one year. Is it proper to list these small, > inexpensive items under supplies or do I have list all of > them individually on Form 4562 even if they cost less than a > dollar. It would make it so much easier if there were a > dollar minimum. adopt a ~reasonable~ policy (in writing) that sets a dollar limit. While I still have a stapler bought several years back, I'm quite sure it didn't make it to the depreciation schedule. Alternatively, you could lump "tools" together on one line item on the depreciation schedule if you were to buy a large amount of tols in one year. The policy might be to expense any ~single~ item less then $xxx, but if part of a group purchase, ie: several items purchased together that exceeded the limit, it would be capitalized and depreciated. -- Paul Thomas, CPA paulthomascpapc[at]bellsouth.net << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| | |||
| |||
| enawach[at]msn.com wrote: - quote - > The IRS pubs state that depreciable property, among other
Most businesses have a policy on minimum capitalization> criteria, must be expected to last more than one year. Some > small tools are relatively inexpensive but can last more > than one year. Is it proper to list these small, > inexpensive items under supplies or do I have list all of > them individually on Form 4562 even if they cost less than a > dollar. It would make it so much easier if there were a > dollar minimum. limits. There is no rule and you probably won't find anything from IRS. The issue here is what accountants refer to as "materiality," which refers to an amount which would be significant to a reader of the financial statements of the business; what is material to you would not be material to Microsoft or other public companies. Only individual items, or group of items, which cost more than the company's minimum would be capitalized; anything for less money would be expenses. Items which must be replaced frequently may also be expensed, even if more than the capitalization limit. The theory is that, over a long term, the overall, cumuative results would be the same either way. For example, I once had a client in the janitorial service business. He bought rather expensive, heavy-duty vacuum cleaners. Being used for several hours, 5 days a week, even the heavy-duty machines usually lasted about a year. Since he was buying several vacuums every year, he charged them to expense. The end result was the same, either way and this meant he didn't need to keep depreciation records and show asset abandonments each year. Lanny K. Williams, CPA Nawarat, Williams & Co., Ltd. Income Tax Services for Expatriate Americans << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| The IRS pubs state that depreciable property, among other criteria, must be expected to last more than one year. Some small tools are relatively inexpensive but can last more than one year. Is it proper to list these small, inexpensive items under supplies or do I have list all of them individually on Form 4562 even if they cost less than a dollar. It would make it so much easier if there were a dollar minimum. Ric Smith, EA Dunlap TN << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| Tags |
| depreciable, property |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Rental Property Deductions Before the Rental Property Ownership? MNRealEstate: Happy New Years to all of you! I am planning a few trips in 2005 to find my first rental property and fulfill my New Year's resolution. 1) Do I... | Taxes | 2 | 12-31-2004 02:49 PM | |
| Which type of property ownership best-serves to protect a property from creditors? IOUERG: Questions: We are in California, and filling up a buyer's escrow information sheet. Which type of ownership is the best to protect a property from... | Taxes | 3 | 05-14-2004 01:29 AM | |
| Re: Tax Free Merger and Treatment of Depreciable Assets under IRC Dave Woods, EA: "Michael Schreiber" <nova_mike23@hotmail.com> wrote: > I have a question regarding the treatment of fixed assets in > a tax-free merger under IRC... | Taxes | 1 | 08-25-2003 12:10 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |