Go Back   CDN Business Directory > Main Category > Taxes

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #3  
Old 06-02-2006, 05:18 AM
Paul Thomas
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Depreciation vs. Supplies

"casey" <thecupps[at]gmail.com> wrote
- quote -

> What makes me put something in depreciation (I would always
> rather put something as a supply since it is less
> paperwork). What makes a something a supply vs. depreciable
> item.
> Here's what I've been doing..
> microwave - depreciable
> replacement dvd remote - supply
> replacement screen door - repair
> sheets - supplies
> new shades - repair


Sounds reasonable to me.

--
Paul A. Thomas, CPA
Athens, Georgia

<< ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== >
  #2  
Old 01-30-2006, 02:39 AM
L K Williams
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Depreciation vs. Supplies

Bob" <bobinsfo[at]yahoo.com> wrote:

- quote -

> This makes sense, but I would like to take it a bit further.
> I have a vacation rental home, and I understand the rules
> about painting vs. adding a room, etc., but what about
> furniture? When we bought the house, we spend about $20,000
> on furniture and then began to depreciate it. Subsequently,
> however, we sometimes buy additional furniture (a $900 desk,
> an $85 TV cabinet, a $1200 painting, etc.). These pieces
> don't add anything to the value of the house (unless it is
> sold turnkey, which is common in Hawaii, where the house
> is), but does it mean that overtime we buy something new we
> need to start a new depreciation schedule? The paperwork
> could be daunting, especially since (for the three examples
> above) they were all bought in different years. Or maybe
> they should be considered personal property (I might take
> the painting if I sold the house, but I might also leave it)
> and not subjected to any kind of tax treatment.


You are wrong! The furniture itself has value, independent
of the value of the house. So, when you buy something like
the desk, you are acquiring a new asset, which has value and
an expected life.

True, it may not add to the intrinsic value of the house but
it is not an integral part of the house, so it must be
considered as a separate asset. This is NOT like replacing
the flooring in the bathroom, for example.

Technically, if you sell a house with all its furniture, you
are supposed to account for the transaction as a series of
sales -- selling the house and land, and selling the various
items of furniture. I am not aware of anyone actually doing
this and I have never seen the IRS insist on this approach.
In any event, it you do sell furnished, your basis includes
the cost of the furniture and, at least in theory, the
furniture increases the amount you can sell for.

Lanny K. Williams, CPA
Nawarat, Williams & Co., Ltd.
Income Tax Services for Expatriate Americans

<< ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== >
  #1  
Old 01-29-2006, 07:19 AM
Bob
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Depreciation vs. Supplies

- quote -

> Maybe a definition of capital and expense would help.
> An expenditure for something would be capitalized if it adds
> to the value or to the expected life of the property.
> An expenditure for something would be expensed if it merely
> restores the value or the expected life of the property.
> An example might be replacing the flooring in a bathroom.
> If you are replacing a linoleum floor with new linoleum, you
> are restoring the value or expected life. On the other
> hand, if you replaced the linoleum with ceramic tile, you
> are adding to the value and extending the life. Linoleum
> would be a replacement, ceramic tile would be an
> improvement.


This makes sense, but I would like to take it a bit further.
I have a vacation rental home, and I understand the rules
about painting vs. adding a room, etc., but what about
furniture? When we bought the house, we spend about $20,000
on furniture and then began to depreciate it. Subsequently,
however, we sometimes buy additional furniture (a $900 desk,
an $85 TV cabinet, a $1200 painting, etc.). These pieces
don't add anything to the value of the house (unless it is
sold turnkey, which is common in Hawaii, where the house
is), but does it mean that overtime we buy something new we
need to start a new depreciation schedule? The paperwork
could be daunting, especially since (for the three examples
above) they were all bought in different years. Or maybe
they should be considered personal property (I might take
the painting if I sold the house, but I might also leave it)
and not subjected to any kind of tax treatment.

<< ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== >
 
Old 01-28-2006, 03:19 AM
L K Williams
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Depreciation vs. Supplies

casey" <thecupps[at]gmail.com> wrote:

- quote -

> I have a rental property
> What makes me put something in depreciation (I would always
> rather put something as a supply since it is less
> paperwork). What makes a something a supply vs. depreciable
> item.
> Here's what I've been doing..
> microwave - depreciable
> replacement dvd remote - supply
> replacement screen door - repair
> sheets - supplies
> new shades - repair


Maybe a definition of capital and expense would help.

An expenditure for something would be capitalized if it adds
to the value or to the expected life of the property.

An expenditure for something would be expensed if it merely
restores the value or the expected life of the property.

An example might be replacing the flooring in a bathroom.
If you are replacing a linoleum floor with new linoleum, you
are restoring the value or expected life. On the other
hand, if you replaced the linoleum with ceramic tile, you
are adding to the value and extending the life. Linoleum
would be a replacement, ceramic tile would be an
improvement.

See, also, my reply to menawach[at]msn.com in the thread
"Depreciable property."

Lanny K. Williams, CPA
Nawarat, Williams & Co., Ltd.
Income Tax Services for Expatriate Americans

<< ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== >
  #-1  
Old 01-27-2006, 01:09 AM
casey
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Depreciation vs. Supplies

I have a rental property

What makes me put something in depreciation (I would always
rather put something as a supply since it is less
paperwork). What makes a something a supply vs. depreciable
item.

Here's what I've been doing..

microwave - depreciable
replacement dvd remote - supply
replacement screen door - repair
sheets - supplies
new shades - repair

<< ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== >
 

Tags
depreciation, supplies
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
Sales Tax On Hurricane Building Supplies? Much Ado About Not Much
William Brenner: Today's (2/13) 'Miami Herald' has a major article dealing with the conundrum as to whether sales tax paid for hurricane protection building...
Taxes 1 02-17-2005 12:33 AM
The difference between "Office Supplies" and "Office Deductions"
bellaisblue: What is the difference between a "Supply Expense" and a "Deduction". I am self-employed. I've got to place these items somewhere: printer...
Taxes 2 04-19-2004 06:49 PM
schedule c. Inventory vs. supplies
Ritchie: I wonder if anybody out there can help me with a tax filing question. I started a small (very small) home business in 2002 selling books on line...
Taxes 2 04-18-2004 05:53 PM
Depreciation
Bill Lloyd: If you run a small business full time and the first year you show a small profit without taking depreciation into account are you allowed to do...
Taxes 5 04-14-2004 07:44 AM
AMT & Depreciation
sftydvr: I'm having difficulty finding where the handling of a substantial capital gain from the sale of a partially depreciated residential rental property...
Taxes 2 09-14-2003 10:51 PM



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:12 PM.