|
#8
| |||
| |||
| You seem to be conflating two different issues -- using e-file and using tax prep software. Thq question of whether to use e-file to avoid IRS errors is orthogonal to the question of whether to use tax preparation software because it makes filing taxes easier and avoids *filer* errors. The IRS's error rate in the transcription of tax returns is very low. There are numerous safeguards in place to prevent errors, including (from my understanding) every return being keyed twice by two different people and cross-checked, and the mathematical relations between various form lines being checked as well. As someone else has pointed out, most filers go through their lives without ever having to deal with an IRS transcription error, and in the rare cases when it does come up, it is easy to resolve. The IRS catches math and copying errors introduced by filers far more often than it introduces errors of its own. - quote - > My belief is that many people may have similar views to mine
Again, you are conflating two very different issues. I've> when tax season rolls around. Tax software and electronic > filing fees - as long as the costs are reasonable - are not > real issues. been using tax prep software to do my taxes for almost twenty years, but I'd never use e-file if I had to pay for it; indeed, I use Federal e-file with TurboTax because I get a rebate, but not State e-file because I don't. I agree with the sentiment that others have expressed, that I shouldn't have to pay money to make the IRS's job easier. Besides that, to me there is pretty much no advantage in using e-file. I have a good laser printer at home, so I can print out clear, clean forms to mail in. I always finish my taxes far enough before April 15 that I don't have to get a receipt from the post office to prove that I mailed them -- there's time enough for the check to clear or the refund to show up in my bank account before April 15, and if it doesn't, I can resubmit the forms. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| I understood that there were - often times - problems when transferring the printed information of a filed paper tax return that could not happen when an electronic filing was used. This concerned the folks at an IRS office and not the actual tax preparer. After having been in the education profession for over 30 years, I cannot help but feel that most people just naturally are not overly diligent about following directions or in transferring numbers from one printed source to another source. It would seem to me that being able to download W-2s and interest information directly from one's place of employment and investment sources, makes tax software worth the expense for users with these problems. Personally, I find tax preparation more fun when using tax software. I also feel that I am able to do my taxes myself (and not miss new tax laws or forms) because I am lead through the process by answering questions and getting to the needed information I require. I know I do not make as many mathematical and transference of data errors when I use (for instance) TurboTax each year. My belief is that many people may have similar views to mine when tax season rolls around. Tax software and electronic filing fees - as long as the costs are reasonable - are not real issues. Our pride and training are not about tax laws nor can we excel to the consistent level of accounting accuracy that a "good" tax professional achieves. Many folks need all the help we can get when paying (and not over-paying) the IRS. Plus, I want to keep this annual process easy, fun, accurate, and honest. Thanks, Tom << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| "T. Willi" <tomson[at]adelpspamhia.net> wrote: - quote - > Dennis, what about the possible loss of your return's
I just got back from business travel so there may be some> accuracy caused by printing-and-mailing it over electronic > filing your income information? > THAT alone, would make me easily decide to file > electronically costs rebated or not! replies I have not looked at. If this was a worry I would never use TT. I am a mathatician by degree and training. I use TT for TAX info and importation of Quicken data which I check by hand with various reports. I am very anal with this. There should be no difference between the electronic filing accuracy and the paper accuracy of the return. At least with the paper filing I know what data goes to the IRS. dennis << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| "Victor Roberts" <xxx[at]lighting-research.com> wrote: - quote - > I don't believe any taxpayer should pay for e-filing just to
should the irs make available on its website for free> help the IRS. If the IRS thinks that e-filing reduces their > costs they should make it available for free. If the > taxpayer feels that e-filing has a particular advantage to > them, then they can choose to pay extra to e-file. continuosusly updated copies of the law it uses in arriving at decisions (e.g. the entire internal revenue code, treasury department regulations, court cases, etc.) or are they already there on the irs website? if not, but they add them to the irs website, what will services like cch etc. do? go out of business? << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| I don't believe any taxpayer should pay for e-filing just to help the IRS. If the IRS thinks that e-filing reduces their costs they should make it available for free. If the taxpayer feels that e-filing has a particular advantage to them, then they can choose to pay extra to e-file. -- Vic Roberts Replace xxx with vdr in e-mail address. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| T. Willi wrote: - quote - > Dennis, what about the possible loss of your return's
It's a good scam! Force people to pay MORE so that they can> accuracy caused by printing-and-mailing it over electronic > filing your income information? > THAT alone, would make me easily decide to file > electronically costs rebated or not! ensure that the workers DO their job correctly! Sort of like paying extra for a "registered" letter since you can't trust the Post Office to deliver 'normal' mail. I will never file electronically if I have to pay extra (or not have the ability to have my fees waived via a credit) for a service that is (unfairly) given to others at no cost. Regards - - Andrew << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "T. Willi" <tomson[at]adelpspamhia.net> wrote: - quote - > Dennis, what about the possible loss of your return's
Huh? Printing changes the accuracy of a return? How can> accuracy caused by printing-and-mailing it over electronic > filing your income information? that happen? I have never seen a figure change or fall off a printed page in the mail either. - quote - > THAT alone, would make me easily decide to file
If you mean that some key-punch operator at the IRS might> electronically costs rebated or not! make a mistake transferring the printed data into the IRS computer -- so what? That's an IRS error and if it should happen it is easily resolved at no cost to me. In 50 years of filing paper returns that has never happened. I can see no reason to spend more than postage to send the forms to the IRS (and the State). -- -Ernie- "There are only two kinds of computer users -- those who have suffered a catastrophic hard drive failure, and those who will." Have you done your backup today? << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Dennis, what about the possible loss of your return's accuracy caused by printing-and-mailing it over electronic filing your income information? THAT alone, would make me easily decide to file electronically costs rebated or not! Tom << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| | |||
| |||
| "Dennis G. Rears" <drears[at]runningpagespam.org.lga.highwinds-media.com> writes: - quote - > In previous years, TT would charge for the state Tax Return
You can't completely generalize this.... Different TurboTax> and Electronic filing but would eventually rebate those fees > to the purchaser. This year the state return was a freebie > and electronic filing is a fee with no rebate. SKUs have different pricing structures. For example, I've been able to download my state's module for free for the past several years directly from the TurboTax Web site, and I've also gotten my Federal eFile fee refunded for the past several years. This year it appears that both of those continue to be true for the TurboTax SKU that I bought. The fact that I bought TurboTax directly from Intuit with AutoRenew appears to be relevant. Here's what it says on the Federal eFile rebate form: "Offer valid only for customers who purchase TurboTax 2005 direct from Intuit on or before 10/15/05..." << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| In previous years, TT would charge for the state Tax Return and Electronic filing but would eventually rebate those fees to the purchaser. This year the state return was a freebie and electronic filing is a fee with no rebate. This will be my first year since I started using TT (2000) that I will not be electronically filing. I will print the forms and use a 39 cent stamp to mail rather than pay a $9.95 or $14.95 fee. I am getting a small federal refund ( <$500) and even smaller NJ state (<$90.00) refund. In previous years it was worth paying the fees and doing the rebate shuffle. Now why bother? The IRS has goals for electronic filing and I think this change in policy is going to negatively impact electronic filings. Comments... dennis P.S. I am separately sending this to alt.comp.software.financial.quicken and misc.taxes.moderated... << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| Tags |
| 2006, electronic, filing, turbotax |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Electronic Filing MG: I do not understand the philosophy or the politic or economic at work behind the electronic filing system. The IRS wants the taxpayers to file... | Taxes | 25 | 12-31-2005 05:49 PM | |
| TurboTax Electron Filing and Customer Service just plain bad! Jerry: Did and electronic filing of my federal and state tax with TurboTax. The transmission stated and went close to the end but never told it it... | Taxes | 4 | 05-18-2004 12:03 AM | |
| TurboTax does not let me delete electronic filing option S.V.Proff: Hello: I initially chose electronic filing while using TurboTax. I then decided against it. However, TurboTax keeps asking for my credit card... | Taxes | 4 | 04-15-2004 08:14 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |