|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "DazedAndConfused" <yale99[at]gmail.com> wrote: You've already gotten a couple of good replies, However I think that there is a more important issue here. I generally do not make the following recommendation lightly but if you feel uncomfortable with your CPA I believe that it is time to find another. Regards, Mark << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "DazedAndConfused" <yale99[at]gmail.com> wrote: - quote - > My nickname says it all - I'm trying to figure out the best > form of organization for a business and my head is swimming. > Any advice or pointers could be greatly appreciated. I'd > also like to talk to a professional expert on this, I don't > think my CPA is well enough versed in this type of thinking > for me to be fully confident in him. Here is the situation: > Business Description > * Provides web development services - designing, building, > and marketing websites and web applications; > * 2005 revenues $200K, almost exclusively from services > * Located in CT > * Right now organized as a single-member LLC; considering > switching to an S corp or C corp, and even if we stay as an > LLC want to determine the best way to structure a gradual > acquisition of equity by a second member over 5 years that > minimizes tax consequences; physical assets are limited, and > setting up a new LLC would be possible; > * One main employee in the US who would be getting equity > starting Jan 1 2006, along with several overseas > employees/contractors and some US based freelancers; > * In the future we expect about 25% of revenues to be spent > on production (paying the overseas employees), 10% on > overhead/marketing, leaving about 65% to compensate the two > owner/operators; that 65% will probably drop as revenues > rise due to middle management required, but long run will be > at least 50% > * We expect the revenues to grow rapidly, 30 - 100% a year > over the next 5 years > * I'm 27, the employee who would be coming on as a partner > is 39; neither of us has a house, wife, or children, and > both are interested in piling up lots of retirement assets; > we get along well and have some ideas for spin off > businesses, or may be interested in coinvesting in real > estate or stocks; > * Question is - C or S or LLC > - C advantages: easier to give large tax deductible > benefits - life, medical, retirement, etc.; corp tax rates > low on the first $100K of profits each year, which would > allow us to pile up cash inside the company for investment > without high personal income and SE taxes on it; for > foreseeable future double taxation could be avoided on > profits of over $100K/year by a combination of > salary/bonuses/benefits > - S advantages: at larger profit amounts (say at 2+ mill of > revenues and 1+ mill of profits) we won't be able to avoid > double taxation on the profits with a C because we would be > capped on what could reasonably be given as salary and > benefits; with 15% dividend taxation the total marginal C > corp rate comes out to about 52% (State and Fed corp tax + > dividend tax), whereas the S is more like 42% (State and Fed > income + medicare) > - LLC advantages: flexibility and all that, but tax wise > appears to be inferior to S corp due to extra SE taxes paid > with no tax advantages > I'm leaning towards a C corp right now. We can avoid a high > marginal double taxation rate for a long time and in the > present our benefits will be fully deductible leaving us > better off than a S corp. Also compiling money inside the > company to fund growth and investment is much cheaper than > with an S. your situation raises legal (liability, etc.) issues as well as taxation and reporting issues arguments can be made in favor of any type of business entity without knowing all the facts consider engaging a professional, well versed in liability and other legal issues, as well as taxation and reporting issues who knows, with all the reporting and other issues as to corps and LLCs, and the ability of skilled attorneys to pierce corporate veils and extend liability to owners, you might be better off as a sole proprietorship have seen horror stories where years after being advised as to the type of business entity to operate out of, the owner(s) realize they totally screwed up on the front end by not learning, upon starting the business, what they needed to know as to entity choice, relying on tax return preparers for their advice, who knew nothing of liability etc. issues so recommend follow current path and learn as much as you need to know to make an informed decision, even if it means hiring a professional << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| | |||
| |||
| "DazedAndConfused" <yale99[at]gmail.com> wrote: - quote - > My nickname says it all - I'm trying to figure out the best
Unfortunately your CPA is the best one in a position to> form of organization for a business and my head is swimming. > Any advice or pointers could be greatly appreciated. I'd > also like to talk to a professional expert on this, I don't > think my CPA is well enough versed in this type of thinking > for me to be fully confident in him. advise you. So if yours can't help, find one who can. Briefly, a C corp is taxed as a separate entity. When it pays you salary it gets to deduct what it pays and you recognize it as income. In most small corporations most if not all the taxable income is paid out to the owners as salary and bonus, so that it doesn't have taxable income. There are some things (but not many) you can deduct with a corporation that you can't otherwise. For example a corporation can deduct charitable contributions but an individual can't on a schedule C. One of the disadvantages of a corporation is that, if it holds depreciable property and otherwise has no taxable income, the depreciation deductions may be wasted. An S corp is generally taxed as if it didn't exist. However losses can't be deducted in excess of your basis in the corporate stock. So if you have highly levereged real estate you might lose out on some of the depreciation deduction. An LLC is not a recognized entity for tax purposes. The IRS allows you to elect how it will be taxed, so it can be taxed as a proprietorship or partnership, a C corporation or an S corporation. Stu << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| My nickname says it all - I'm trying to figure out the best form of organization for a business and my head is swimming. Any advice or pointers could be greatly appreciated. I'd also like to talk to a professional expert on this, I don't think my CPA is well enough versed in this type of thinking for me to be fully confident in him. Here is the situation: Business Description * Provides web development services - designing, building, and marketing websites and web applications; * 2005 revenues $200K, almost exclusively from services * Located in CT * Right now organized as a single-member LLC; considering switching to an S corp or C corp, and even if we stay as an LLC want to determine the best way to structure a gradual acquisition of equity by a second member over 5 years that minimizes tax consequences; physical assets are limited, and setting up a new LLC would be possible; * One main employee in the US who would be getting equity starting Jan 1 2006, along with several overseas employees/contractors and some US based freelancers; * In the future we expect about 25% of revenues to be spent on production (paying the overseas employees), 10% on overhead/marketing, leaving about 65% to compensate the two owner/operators; that 65% will probably drop as revenues rise due to middle management required, but long run will be at least 50% * We expect the revenues to grow rapidly, 30 - 100% a year over the next 5 years * I'm 27, the employee who would be coming on as a partner is 39; neither of us has a house, wife, or children, and both are interested in piling up lots of retirement assets; we get along well and have some ideas for spin off businesses, or may be interested in coinvesting in real estate or stocks; * Question is - C or S or LLC - C advantages: easier to give large tax deductible benefits - life, medical, retirement, etc.; corp tax rates low on the first $100K of profits each year, which would allow us to pile up cash inside the company for investment without high personal income and SE taxes on it; for foreseeable future double taxation could be avoided on profits of over $100K/year by a combination of salary/bonuses/benefits - S advantages: at larger profit amounts (say at 2+ mill of revenues and 1+ mill of profits) we won't be able to avoid double taxation on the profits with a C because we would be capped on what could reasonably be given as salary and benefits; with 15% dividend taxation the total marginal C corp rate comes out to about 52% (State and Fed corp tax + dividend tax), whereas the S is more like 42% (State and Fed income + medicare) - LLC advantages: flexibility and all that, but tax wise appears to be inferior to S corp due to extra SE taxes paid with no tax advantages I'm leaning towards a C corp right now. We can avoid a high marginal double taxation rate for a long time and in the present our benefits will be fully deductible leaving us better off than a S corp. Also compiling money inside the company to fund growth and investment is much cheaper than with an S. Thoughts? DF << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| Tags |
| corp, llc |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| how to form a 2nd corp with privledges to use 1st corp tax ID alocker@bellsouth.net: We presently have a medical type office and would like to open up a 2nd. THe 1st office is an S-Corp with the original owner. The second office... | Taxes | 4 | 11-06-2005 04:10 PM | |
| Is there some site that lists the differences between S-Corp and C-Corp (and LLC)? John: I'm getting lost in the differences between the S-Corp and C-Corp. They treat medical savings plans differently, they treat fringe benefits... | Taxes | 1 | 08-26-2004 01:42 AM | |
| suspended k-1 loss, s corp goes to c corp BM30003700: a client of mine revoked s corp status prior to march 15, 2003, so became c corp effective 1/1/03. at 12/31/02, had approximately zero basis in s... | Taxes | 1 | 10-11-2003 06:43 AM | |
| Tax motivations to switch to an S-Corp from a C-Corp... Tripp Knightly: I realize the decision to choose / switch S over C is more than just current-year tax liability & avoiding double tax, but I want to understand the... | Taxes | 3 | 07-30-2003 07:38 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |