Go Back   CDN Business Directory > Main Category > Taxes

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #3  
Old 01-27-2006, 12:31 AM
Victor Roberts
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Important Message for all to read

George <_g_bnotreallymyaddresseccles[at]verizon.net> wrote:

- quote -

> If so: when I "reply via e-mail" from Free Agent, I get an
> error, saying that "Dick Adams <rdadams[at]smart.net> is 'Not a
> valid e-mail address'" when I try to send it. When I reduce
> that to just radams[at]smart.net, I get an "authentication
> required" error.


I know this is off-topic, so I will keep it short. I also
use Agent to read this group - but not the free version. If
you get an "authentication required" error you have not set
up your copy of Agent correctly. You have chosen to use an
SMTP server that requires authentication to send e-mail with
Agent and it requires your username and password.

--
Vic Roberts
Replace xxx with vdr in e-mail address.

<< ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== >
  #2  
Old 01-24-2006, 11:06 PM
George
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Important Message for all to read

Dick Adams <rdadams[at]smart.net) wrote:

- quote -

> If you previously responded to my "Plan
> for 2006", you need to do nothing. Otherwise send me an email
> with your normal posting "From" header and in the body include
> your name and your real e-mail address.


I read here regularly, but post rarely. I didn't even
notice "Plan for 2006". I haven't had any problems with
posting. I gather that the above would still apply to me?

If so: when I "reply via e-mail" from Free Agent, I get an
error, saying that "Dick Adams <rdadams[at]smart.net> is 'Not a
valid e-mail address'" when I try to send it. When I reduce
that to just radams[at]smart.net, I get an "authentication
required" error.

I'm not sure how I would send the required message with my
regular e-mail (Eudora), since that doesn't let me mangle my
'from' address.

(Apologies for being dense.)

George

Moderator:
I remember when this stuff was simple. OK here is a
solution that will be effective as of 8pm EST tonight.
Post it to the newsgroup and use the subject "MTM - 2006".
I will modify my filter to route it propeerly.

<< ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== >
  #1  
Old 01-07-2006, 10:44 PM
Han
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Important Message for all to read

an_ordinary_guy_158[at]hotmail.com (Bill) wrote in

- quote -

> Re: the problem with blocked mail.
> Dick, if it's any comfort to you, the internet seems to be
> rife with complaints about this. I personally am involved
> in a situation where my niece has every email she sends me
> "bounced" with a notation that email from her has been
> "blocked" by the addressee, or the addressee's server.
> Now, since she was both in my address book and on my "safe
> contact" list, I knew that should be hooey ... but research
> revealed that the only way to track this down, is to have
> _her_ initiate a request with her sysadmin to investigate.
> In the process, I posted a query in a "help" group, and that
> created a thread of several hundred replies -- most from
> others who were suffering similar problems. But the
> internet gurus who actually knew something, were unanimous
> that it must be pursued by the sender, through their ISP or
> system administrator. [The help group moderator was not too
> happy, either -- and cut off the thread.]
> The problem is related to the internet-wide scourge of spam,
> and both aol and Microsoft are undertaking major drives to
> reduce spam ... thus leading to the "blocking" issues.


IMHO, at least *sometimes* the ISP of the receiver is at
fault, certainly when it is Verizon. Just over a year ago
Verizon started a new policy, over and above their infamous
sender verification, whereby all email from foreign domains
was refused. That means that in theory, the sender's ISP
(not Verizon) should send the sender some type of bounce
message. This was very annoying for some people, like my
spouse who had their Verizon email on their web page
(genealogy) as contact, so people could contact her, even
people unknown to my wife.

After a lot of noise Verizon relented a tiny little bit, and
you (the intended recipient) can now initiate a request to
have email addresses added to a white list. For more info
consult the 0.verizon newsgroups, only accessible to verizon
customer when on the verizon network.

--
Best regards
Han
email address is invalid

<< ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== >
 
Old 01-07-2006, 02:17 AM
Bill
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Important Message for all to read

Re: the problem with blocked mail.

Dick, if it's any comfort to you, the internet seems to be
rife with complaints about this. I personally am involved
in a situation where my niece has every email she sends me
"bounced" with a notation that email from her has been
"blocked" by the addressee, or the addressee's server.

Now, since she was both in my address book and on my "safe
contact" list, I knew that should be hooey ... but research
revealed that the only way to track this down, is to have
_her_ initiate a request with her sysadmin to investigate.

In the process, I posted a query in a "help" group, and that
created a thread of several hundred replies -- most from
others who were suffering similar problems. But the
internet gurus who actually knew something, were unanimous
that it must be pursued by the sender, through their ISP or
system administrator. [The help group moderator was not too
happy, either -- and cut off the thread.]

The problem is related to the internet-wide scourge of spam,
and both aol and Microsoft are undertaking major drives to
reduce spam ... thus leading to the "blocking" issues.

Bill

<< ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== >
  #-1  
Old 01-06-2006, 03:18 AM
Dick Adams
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Important Message for all to read

I moderate from a UNIX Shell account and use a Procmail
filter. The filter uses several traps which catch e-mail
from various orgaizations and five filter files. One file
is "Accept All" and another is "Burn before Read".

Two people have informed me that their posts are not getting
to me. Both are in my "Accept All" filter file. That mean
the posts are not coming to me. While I believe this is the
fault of their ISP, I am going to completely redo my "Accept
All" filter file. If you previously responded to my "Plan
for 2006", you need to do nothing. Otherwise send me an email
with your normal posting "From" header and in the body include
your name and your real e-mail address.

If you are having problems posting, send me an e-mail at
rdadams[at]smart.net and ask your ISP to check their routing
of posts for moderated newsgroups - MTM in particular.

I'd like this problem to go away very fast.

Dick

P.S.: I still delete nonsense without notification.

<< ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== >
 

Tags
important, message, read
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
Re: Important please read this Thank you! `°º·...·º°`°º·...·º°`°º·.†..·º°`°º·...·º°`°º·..·º°` `°º·...·º°`°º·...·º°`°º·.†..·º°`°º·...·º°`°º·..·º°` `°º·...·º°`°º·...·º°`°º·.†..·º°`°º·...·º°`°º·..·º°` `°º·...·º°`°º·...·º°`°º·.†..·º°`°º·...·º°`°º·..·º°`
HitMan: I hope you meet your savior sooner rather than later... And hopefully he actually did atone for the sins you are committing on this board. ...
Microsoft Money 1 05-05-2005 02:40 AM
Re: Important please read this Thank you! `°º·...·º°`°º·...·º°`°º·.?..·º°`°º·...·º°`°º·..·º°` `°º·...·º°`°º·...·º°`°º·.?..·º°`°º·...·º°`°º·..·º°` `°º·...·º°`°º·...·º°`°º·.?..·º°`°º·...·º°`°º·..·º°` `°º·...·º°`°º·...·º°`°º·.?..·º°`°º·...·º°`°º·..·º°`
Eric Nichols: Ronald, Lets take a look at some scripture, it'll only take a second and it directly relates to what you are trying to do by posting these...
Microsoft Money 3 05-05-2005 02:40 AM
Microsoft 2003 Error Message: cannot read file
Lisa: I was using Microsoft 99. Recently upgraded to Microsoft 2003. When I try to open money.mny I get the following message: Money cannot locate...
Microsoft Money 1 07-29-2003 12:33 PM



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:04 PM.