|
#12
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > > Your numbers are off. The S&L tax burden for CA was 10.3%
the amount of federal money going to a particular state is> > > ($4078) of $39,715 of per capita income. The federal burden > > > was 19.6% or $7784. That's a total tax burden of $11862. > > Well, darn if I can't find the table I was looking at the > > other day. But what I see now about Calif. jives with your > > comment. so, I will restate my comment: > > > So, the average Californian pays less than $12,000 in > > federal and state taxes? The average person pays less than > > $4,000 in Federal taxes? There are a small percentage who > > are making up the shortfall big time. And, there are not > > enough people in this country saying "thank you"! > Again, I don't know where you are getting your numbers. The > S&L tax burden in the US was $3763 or 10% of $37167 per > capita income. The average federal tax burden was 19% or > $7062. That's a combined burden per capita of $10825. CA > burden was $11862. > In addition, these are not really representative of the > average Californian or average American. They are per > capita data. Finally, the numbers by themselves don't take > into account the amount of federal payments that go to each > state. You would really need to look at what the residents > of a state are paying to the feds versus what they get from > the feds. not the same thing as the amount of federal money going to a particular taxpayer. I'll restate my comments: So, the average Californian and average Californian family pays an outrageously below average of federal and state taxes? The average person and the average family pays an outrageously below average Federal taxes? There are a small percentage who are making up the shortfall big time. And, there are not enough people and families in this country saying "thank you"! << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > Your numbers are off. The S&L tax burden for CA was 10.3%
Again, I don't know where you are getting your numbers. The> > ($4078) of $39,715 of per capita income. The federal burden > > was 19.6% or $7784. That's a total tax burden of $11862. > Well, darn if I can't find the table I was looking at the > other day. But what I see now about Calif. jives with your > comment. so, I will restate my comment: > So, the average Californian pays less than $12,000 in > federal and state taxes? The average person pays less than > $4,000 in Federal taxes? There are a small percentage who > are making up the shortfall big time. And, there are not > enough people in this country saying "thank you"! S&L tax burden in the US was $3763 or 10% of $37167 per capita income. The average federal tax burden was 19% or $7062. That's a combined burden per capita of $10825. CA burden was $11862. In addition, these are not really representative of the average Californian or average American. They are per capita data. Finally, the numbers by themselves don't take into account the amount of federal payments that go to each state. You would really need to look at what the residents of a state are paying to the feds versus what they get from the feds. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| Average person - man, woman, child, worker, retiree, student, bum. It is the per capita tax. Multiply by the average household size and you get the amount per household. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| "Gil Faver" <Rowdy'sboss[at]ND.com> wrote: - quote - > So, the average Californian pays less than $12,000 in
At $4,000 per person that would be about right for the $1> federal and state taxes? The average person pays less than > $4,000 in Federal taxes? There are a small percentage who > are making up the shortfall big time. And, there are not > enough people in this country saying "thank you"! trillion the feds take in from income taxes. According to census.gov that's about half of the total the government takes in, the rest being from employment taxes (69% of the balance), corporate taxes (21%), estate and gift taxes (3%) and excise taxes. Stu << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > > http://www.taxfoundation.org/publications/show/335.html
Well, darn if I can't find the table I was looking at the> > > They calculate the state & local tax burden expressed > > > as of income. They also add in the federal burden to > > > arrive at a combined tax burden. You can download a > > > file with 35 > > > years of data for all states. > > > > > The following link takes the data for 2005 and also > > > shows the per capita amounts. > > > http://www.retirementliving.com/RLtaxburdens.html > > So, the average Californian pays less than $8,000 in > > federal and state taxes? The average person pays less > > than $4,000 in Federal taxes? There are a small > > percentage who are making up the shortfall big time. > > And, there are not enough people in this country saying > > "thank you"! > Your numbers are off. The S&L tax burden for CA was 10.3% > ($4078) of $39,715 of per capita income. The federal burden > was 19.6% or $7784. That's a total tax burden of $11862. other day. But what I see now about Calif. jives with your comment. so, I will restate my comment: So, the average Californian pays less than $12,000 in federal and state taxes? The average person pays less than $4,000 in Federal taxes? There are a small percentage who are making up the shortfall big time. And, there are not enough people in this country saying "thank you"! << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > http://www.taxfoundation.org/publications/show/335.html
Your numbers are off. The S&L tax burden for CA was 10.3%> > They calculate the state & local tax burden expressed as of > > income. They also add in the federal burden to arrive at > > a combined tax burden. You can download a file with 35 > > years of data for all states. > > > The following link takes the data for 2005 and also shows > > the per capita amounts. > > http://www.retirementliving.com/RLtaxburdens.html > So, the average Californian pays less than $8,000 in federal > and state taxes? The average person pays less than $4,000 > in Federal taxes? There are a small percentage who are > making up the shortfall big time. And, there are not enough > people in this country saying "thank you"! ($4078) of $39,715 of per capita income. The federal burden was 19.6% or $7784. That's a total tax burden of $11862. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > http://www.taxfoundation.org/publications/show/335.html
So, the average Californian pays less than $8,000 in federal> They calculate the state & local tax burden expressed as of > income. They also add in the federal burden to arrive at > a combined tax burden. You can download a file with 35 > years of data for all states. > The following link takes the data for 2005 and also shows > the per capita amounts. > http://www.retirementliving.com/RLtaxburdens.html and state taxes? The average person pays less than $4,000 in Federal taxes? There are a small percentage who are making up the shortfall big time. And, there are not enough people in this country saying "thank you"! << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| "HW "Skip" Weldon" <skip5700removethis[at]hotmail.com> wrote: - quote - > Harlan Lunsford <hlunsford[at]bellsouth.net> wrote:
That would not give much of a clue as to what anyone's TAXES> > Not sure if this pertains, but NM taxes social security income, > > unlike many other states, as my former Georgia clients found > > out after they moved to .... (scratching my head now)... some > > little town near Albuqueque. > As for choosing a place to live because of taxes, my view > has been that all states need revenue to run the state. > They merely vary on their sources of collection. Thus > focusing on a single area of taxation (income, property, > intangibles, etc.) tax would not be helpful. > What would be interesting is to see a comparison of total > state *spending* per capita. That would give better insight > to what total taxes might be from state to state. > Is there such a list? would be. We would need to see a listing of the various taxes by state. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| HW "Skip" Weldon wrote: - quote - > Harlan Lunsford <hlunsford[at]bellsouth.net> wrote: http://www.taxfoundation.org/publications/show/335.html> > Not sure if this pertains, but NM taxes social security income, > > unlike many other states, as my former Georgia clients found > > out after they moved to .... (scratching my head now)... some > > little town near Albuqueque. > As for choosing a place to live because of taxes, my view > has been that all states need revenue to run the state. > They merely vary on their sources of collection. Thus > focusing on a single area of taxation (income, property, > intangibles, etc.) tax would not be helpful. > What would be interesting is to see a comparison of total > state *spending* per capita. That would give better insight > to what total taxes might be from state to state. > Is there such a list? > -------- > Off topic: We lived in Albuquerque in the mid-70s and really > liked it. Real Mexican food, with a cold Oly beer... They calculate the state & local tax burden expressed as a % of income. They also add in the federal burden to arrive at a combined tax burden. You can download a file with 35 years of data for all states. The following link takes the data for 2005 and also shows the per capita amounts. http://www.retirementliving.com/RLtaxburdens.html << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Harlan Lunsford <hlunsford[at]bellsouth.net> wrote: - quote - > Not sure if this pertains, but NM taxes social security income,
As for choosing a place to live because of taxes, my view> unlike many other states, as my former Georgia clients found > out after they moved to .... (scratching my head now)... some > little town near Albuqueque. has been that all states need revenue to run the state. They merely vary on their sources of collection. Thus focusing on a single area of taxation (income, property, intangibles, etc.) tax would not be helpful. What would be interesting is to see a comparison of total state *spending* per capita. That would give better insight to what total taxes might be from state to state. Is there such a list? -------- Off topic: We lived in Albuquerque in the mid-70s and really liked it. Real Mexican food, with a cold Oly beer... -HW "Skip" Weldon Columbia, SC << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| A.G. Kalman wrote: - quote - > Just thought I'd let you all know that the family has
Congrats for making the move out of Kalh yee fornicate yah.> abandoned Los Angeles, CA and we are now domiciled and > residents of The Land of Enchantment, the 47th State to > enter the Union. Not sure if this pertains, but NM taxes social security income, unlike many other states, as my former Georgia clients found out after they moved to .... (scratching my head now)... some little town near Albuqueque. ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "A.G. Kalman" <glendale202-tax[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > Just thought I'd let you all know that the family has
Congratulations. I hope this move works out extremely> abandoned Los Angeles, CA and we are now domiciled and > residents of The Land of Enchantment, the 47th State to > enter the Union. well for you and your family. Please note there are rumors that GOV-ner AH-nold is trying to enact a regulation so that KEL-E-forn-YA follows federal regulations and all you leave will have to pay Kal-E-forn-YA taxes for ten years. Dick << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| | |||
| |||
| "A.G. Kalman" <glendale202-tax[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > Just thought I'd let you all know that the family has
Good move. Congratulations.> abandoned Los Angeles, CA and we are now domiciled and > residents of The Land of Enchantment, the 47th State to > enter the Union. -- To email me directly, remove CLUTTER. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Just thought I'd let you all know that the family has abandoned Los Angeles, CA and we are now domiciled and residents of The Land of Enchantment, the 47th State to enter the Union. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| Tags |
| california, mexico |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| MSA-to-HSA: California tax Jay: California doesn't conform with federal provisions for HSAs. It looks like they're taxing an MSA-to-HSA rollover twice: - income tax (schedule CA... | Taxes | 6 | 03-21-2005 05:42 AM | |
| California Resident or Not? A. G. Kalman: The following case was recently decided by the CA Courts of Appeal for the 2nd District (Los Angeles & Ventura). I'm posting it here because it... | Taxes | 4 | 08-19-2004 09:02 PM | |
| Tax & Suvivorship, California Paul M. White: I'm beneficiary to a will of a 75 yr. woman. We've not married and been together 8 years. I'm 60,not related. She purposely named and left her... | Taxes | 6 | 08-10-2004 09:03 AM | |
| California and IRC Sec 1341 Bob Aldrich: IRC Sec 1341 allows a taxpayer to claim a deduction in the current year for a repayment of an amount that was included in income in an earlier... | Taxes | 4 | 03-03-2004 01:31 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |