|
#3
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > I am looking for information on amortizing mortgage points
Regulation 1.446-5 requires the constant yield to maturity> > using the constant yield method. > > > Background: > > > I originally purchased my house on 11/30/2001. I financed > > the purchase with a 20-year fixed rate loan; the face amount > > of the loan was $166,000, and I paid 1.280 points > > ($2,124.80). Because I purchased the house late in the > > year, it was not advantageous for me to itemize my > > deductions in 2001, and I have been amortizing the points in > > proportion to the stated interest payments. > > > (This amortization method is allowed for de minimis OID. > > Some readers may remember the argument in this newsgroup > > about whether mortgage points are OID. Publication 936 has > > been updated to specifically state that they are.) > > > Earlier this year, I refinanced my first mortgage with a 5/1 > > ARM from the same lender; the face amount of this loan was > > $151,295, and I paid 1.054 points ($1,594.65). There are > > also $1,565.15 unamortized points from the original loan. > > > I am also making significant principal prepayments on the > > new loan. > > > The information I've found on the IRS site so far only > > convers constant yield calculations for "non-installment" > > loans. I can't find anything on installment loans, let > > alone an ARM with prepayments. > > > Any hints on where to look would be appreciated. > I thought that points which are spread out are simply taken > over the life of the loan, i.e. divide by the term of the > loan. And when you refinance, you can take the balance at > once. I'd ask, given the sum involved, $1600, which if > divided is $80 a year. An amortizing to the interest paid, > might double that up front, granted, but is it worth all the > math and additional record keeping? JOE method for some loans that are required to be capitalized under Regulation 1.263(a)-5. These constant yield to maturity rules don't apply to your principal residence. Although I believe you can use them if you want to. So constant yield to maturity is available but I would suggest the difference with straight line isn't worth the effort. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| JoeTaxpayer wrote: - quote - > I thought that points which are spread out are simply taken
As Herb mentioned, if you refinance with the same lender you> over the life of the loan, i.e. divide by the term of the > loan. And when you refinance, you can take the balance at > once. I'd ask, given the sum involved, $1600, which if > divided is $80 a year. An amortizing to the interest paid, > might double that up front, granted, but is it worth all the > math and additional record keeping? JOE have to add the unamortized points to the new loan. (I didn't realize that either when I refinanced; talk about a good way to screw up one's tax calculations!) In fact, it looks like "straight line" amortization will be more advantageous than constant yield, so it's definitely not worth the trouble. Amortizing the points proportionally to stated interest payments is the most advantageous method, and that's what I was doing with the 20-year conventional loan; I have no idea how to go about using that method in this situation, however. Thanks for the responses! -- ================================================== ====================== Ian Pilcher i.pilcher[at]comcast.net ================================================== ====================== << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| JoeTaxpayer wrote: - quote - > Ian Pilcher wrote:
Not quite correct. If you refinance WITH THE SAME LENDER,> > I am looking for information on amortizing mortgage points > > using the constant yield method. > > > Background: > > > I originally purchased my house on 11/30/2001. I financed > > the purchase with a 20-year fixed rate loan; the face amount > > of the loan was $166,000, and I paid 1.280 points > > ($2,124.80). Because I purchased the house late in the > > year, it was not advantageous for me to itemize my > > deductions in 2001, and I have been amortizing the points in > > proportion to the stated interest payments. > > > (This amortization method is allowed for de minimis OID. > > Some readers may remember the argument in this newsgroup > > about whether mortgage points are OID. Publication 936 has > > been updated to specifically state that they are.) > > > Earlier this year, I refinanced my first mortgage with a 5/1 > > ARM from the same lender; the face amount of this loan was > > $151,295, and I paid 1.054 points ($1,594.65). There are > > also $1,565.15 unamortized points from the original loan. > > > I am also making significant principal prepayments on the > > new loan. > > > The information I've found on the IRS site so far only > > convers constant yield calculations for "non-installment" > > loans. I can't find anything on installment loans, let > > alone an ARM with prepayments. > > > Any hints on where to look would be appreciated. > I thought that points which are spread out are simply taken > over the life of the loan, i.e. divide by the term of the > loan. And when you refinance, you can take the balance at > once. the "old" points are ADDED to the new points (from the refinance) and then amortized over the new loan term. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| | |||
| |||
| Ian Pilcher wrote: - quote - > I am looking for information on amortizing mortgage points
I thought that points which are spread out are simply taken> using the constant yield method. > Background: > I originally purchased my house on 11/30/2001. I financed > the purchase with a 20-year fixed rate loan; the face amount > of the loan was $166,000, and I paid 1.280 points > ($2,124.80). Because I purchased the house late in the > year, it was not advantageous for me to itemize my > deductions in 2001, and I have been amortizing the points in > proportion to the stated interest payments. > (This amortization method is allowed for de minimis OID. > Some readers may remember the argument in this newsgroup > about whether mortgage points are OID. Publication 936 has > been updated to specifically state that they are.) > Earlier this year, I refinanced my first mortgage with a 5/1 > ARM from the same lender; the face amount of this loan was > $151,295, and I paid 1.054 points ($1,594.65). There are > also $1,565.15 unamortized points from the original loan. > I am also making significant principal prepayments on the > new loan. > The information I've found on the IRS site so far only > convers constant yield calculations for "non-installment" > loans. I can't find anything on installment loans, let > alone an ARM with prepayments. > Any hints on where to look would be appreciated. over the life of the loan, i.e. divide by the term of the loan. And when you refinance, you can take the balance at once. I'd ask, given the sum involved, $1600, which if divided is $80 a year. An amortizing to the interest paid, might double that up front, granted, but is it worth all the math and additional record keeping? JOE << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I am looking for information on amortizing mortgage points using the constant yield method. Background: I originally purchased my house on 11/30/2001. I financed the purchase with a 20-year fixed rate loan; the face amount of the loan was $166,000, and I paid 1.280 points ($2,124.80). Because I purchased the house late in the year, it was not advantageous for me to itemize my deductions in 2001, and I have been amortizing the points in proportion to the stated interest payments. (This amortization method is allowed for de minimis OID. Some readers may remember the argument in this newsgroup about whether mortgage points are OID. Publication 936 has been updated to specifically state that they are.) Earlier this year, I refinanced my first mortgage with a 5/1 ARM from the same lender; the face amount of this loan was $151,295, and I paid 1.054 points ($1,594.65). There are also $1,565.15 unamortized points from the original loan. I am also making significant principal prepayments on the new loan. The information I've found on the IRS site so far only convers constant yield calculations for "non-installment" loans. I can't find anything on installment loans, let alone an ARM with prepayments. Any hints on where to look would be appreciated. Thanks! -- ================================================== ====================== Ian Pilcher i.pilcher[at]comcast.net ================================================== ====================== << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| Tags |
| arm, calculation, constant, yield |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| How do I stop the constant page refresh? Stan: Most of the pages in Money are automatically refreshing and it's annoying. How do I turn off the automatic refresh? The refresh appears on the home... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 03-24-2007 04:57 PM | |
| Constant error message T: I have recently been experiencing problems with M01. The program will start, and I can see my information, yet a consistant error message of... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 07-24-2005 12:05 AM | |
| Constant connections with M05 RJH: Money 2005 (in XP) is connecting at startup and when I disconnect it, it reconnects. The only way I've found to stop it is change my dialing prefs... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 10-17-2004 02:44 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |