|
#11
| |||
| |||
| Gil Faver <Rowdy'sboss[at]ND.com> wrote: - quote - > "Stuart A. Bronstein" <spamtrap[at]lexregia.com> wrote in
[girls sell lemonade, profits donated to charity]> > "Gil Faver" <Rowdy'sboss[at]ND.com> wrote: > > > "Seth Breidbart" <sethb[at]panix.com> wrote: - quote - > > > > I still say they formed a business organization which was
Even if the price paid for the lemonade is the fair market> > > > pledged to donate its profits (or proceeds) to charity. > > > > That's not the same thing. > > > doesn't "a business organization which was pledged to donate > > > its profits (or proceeds) to charity" fit the broad > > > definition of "charitable organization"? If not, why? What > > > are the tax consequences of any difference? > > I suppose you could say that. But then there's the issue of > > whether selling lemonade is, itself, so linked to the > > charitable purpose that it doesn't result in unrelated > > business income. > > > Under the circumstances they're probably better off as a > > for-profit that donates all its income rather than a > > nonprofit that pays tax on its ubi. > I believe the proper treatment is as a charitable trust, > where all the income is treated as a charitable contribution > and fully deductible. value? A for-profit partnership can be done quite informally (as here); wouldn't a trust require some amount of legal work? Seth << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| "Stuart A. Bronstein" <spamtrap[at]lexregia.com> wrote in - quote - > "Gil Faver" <Rowdy'sboss[at]ND.com> wrote:
I believe the proper treatment is as a charitable trust,> > "Seth Breidbart" <sethb[at]panix.com> wrote: > > > I still say they formed a business organization which was > > > pledged to donate its profits (or proceeds) to charity. > > > That's not the same thing. > > doesn't "a business organization which was pledged to donate > > its profits (or proceeds) to charity" fit the broad > > definition of "charitable organization"? If not, why? What > > are the tax consequences of any difference? > I suppose you could say that. But then there's the issue of > whether selling lemonade is, itself, so linked to the > charitable purpose that it doesn't result in unrelated > business income. > Under the circumstances they're probably better off as a > for-profit that donates all its income rather than a > nonprofit that pays tax on its ubi. where all the income is treated as a charitable contribution and fully deductible. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap[at]lexregia.com> wrote: - quote - > Well then, audit the parents. They're not entitled to a
Let's see if we're dealing with the same facts. I'll> thing, the cheap bastards. simplify a little. 11-year old girl sets up a lemonade stand. She earns $400. She gives that $400 to her parents, requesting that they donate it to the Red Cross. They do so. 1. Her earnings of $400 don't cause tax liability (given reasonable assumptions about her total annual income). 2. The gift to her parents doesn't create tax liability. 3. The donation by her parents to the Red Cross is deductible. Seth << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| "Gil Faver" <Rowdy'sboss[at]ND.com> wrote: - quote - > "Seth Breidbart" <sethb[at]panix.com> wrote:
I suppose you could say that. But then there's the issue of> > I still say they formed a business organization which was > > pledged to donate its profits (or proceeds) to charity. > > That's not the same thing. > doesn't "a business organization which was pledged to donate > its profits (or proceeds) to charity" fit the broad > definition of "charitable organization"? If not, why? What > are the tax consequences of any difference? whether selling lemonade is, itself, so linked to the charitable purpose that it doesn't result in unrelated business income. Under the circumstances they're probably better off as a for-profit that donates all its income rather than a nonprofit that pays tax on its ubi. Stu << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| "Seth Breidbart" <sethb[at]panix.com> wrote: - quote - > Gil Faver <Rowdy'sboss[at]ND.com> wrote:
doesn't "a business organization which was pledged to donate> > "Harlan Lunsford" <hlunsford[at]bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > I can see now my first post could have been clearer. The > > > girls sold lemonade which they made themselves. they had > > > purchased all the supplies, lemon, sugar, etc from local > > > grocery store using their own funds, hence their parents > > > were not initially involved. > > from your original post: "and raised about 1200$ for > > hurricane victims' relief". > > > sounds like they formed a charitable organization to me. > I still say they formed a business organization which was > pledged to donate its profits (or proceeds) to charity. > That's not the same thing. its profits (or proceeds) to charity" fit the broad definition of "charitable organization"? If not, why? What are the tax consequences of any difference? << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Gil Faver <Rowdy'sboss[at]ND.com> wrote: - quote - > "Harlan Lunsford" <hlunsford[at]bellsouth.net> wrote:
I still say they formed a business organization which was> > I can see now my first post could have been clearer. The > > girls sold lemonade which they made themselves. they had > > purchased all the supplies, lemon, sugar, etc from local > > grocery store using their own funds, hence their parents > > were not initially involved. > from your original post: "and raised about 1200$ for > hurricane victims' relief". > sounds like they formed a charitable organization to me. pledged to donate its profits (or proceeds) to charity. That's not the same thing. Seth << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| "Harlan Lunsford" <hlunsford[at]bellsouth.net> wrote: - quote - > Stuart A. Bronstein wrote:
from your original post: "and raised about 1200$ for> > sethb[at]panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: > > > Did they solicit contributions? All I read is that they > > > sold lemonade. > > They solicited contributions from their parents. > I can see now my first post could have been clearer. The > girls sold lemonade which they made themselves. they had > purchased all the supplies, lemon, sugar, etc from local > grocery store using their own funds, hence their parents > were not initially involved. hurricane victims' relief". sounds like they formed a charitable organization to me. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Harlan Lunsford <hlunsford[at]bellsouth.net> wrote: - quote - > Stuart A. Bronstein wrote:
Well then, audit the parents. They're not entitled to a> > sethb[at]panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: > > > Did they solicit contributions? All I read is that they > > > sold lemonade. > > They solicited contributions from their parents. > I can see now my first post could have been clearer. The > girls sold lemonade which they made themselves. they had > purchased all the supplies, lemon, sugar, etc from local > grocery store using their own funds, hence their parents > were not initially involved. thing, the cheap bastards. Stu << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Stuart A. Bronstein wrote: - quote - > sethb[at]panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote:
I can see now my first post could have been clearer. The> > Did they solicit contributions? All I read is that they > > sold lemonade. > They solicited contributions from their parents. girls sold lemonade which they made themselves. they had purchased all the supplies, lemon, sugar, etc from local grocery store using their own funds, hence their parents were not initially involved. ChEAr$, Harlan << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| sethb[at]panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: - quote - > 123go <rejecto[at]rejcet.ccc> wrote:
That should be the rule - do you have any authority for it?> > Thus the parents donated items to the charitable > > organization, and can deduct the value of those items. > No, donations to an _unrecognized_ charitable organization > are not deductible. I doubt the three girls got a 501(c)(3) > ruling from the IRS. - quote - > > as an unincorporated association, with the sole purpose of
They solicited contributions from their parents.> > charity. per Calif. Business and Professions Code 17510.2. > > (d) "charity" shall include any person who, or any nonprofit > > community organization, fraternal, benevolent, educational, > > philanthropic, or service organization, or governmental > > employee organization which, solicits or obtains > > contributions solicited from the public for charitable > > purposes or holds any assets for charitable purposes. > > > Thus, the girls formed a charitable organization > Did they solicit contributions? All I read is that they > sold lemonade. Stu << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| 123go <rejecto[at]rejcet.ccc> wrote: - quote - > "William Brenner" <wbrenner[at]nospamplease.net> wrote:
No, donations to an _unrecognized_ charitable organization> > Can we safely assume that the parents provided the capital > > expended to purchase the lemons, the sugar, the cups and > > even the water? They most likely also physically purchased > > the raw materials at the grocery store. They might even have > > participated in making the lemonade. > Thus the parents donated items to the charitable > organization, and can deduct the value of those items. are not deductible. I doubt the three girls got a 501(c)(3) ruling from the IRS. - quote - > > The girls, who thus had no monetary investment in the
Did they solicit contributions? All I read is that they> > project, volunteered their time and effort to market the > > lemonade. > as an unincorporated association, with the sole purpose of > charity. per Calif. Business and Professions Code 17510.2. > (d) "charity" shall include any person who, or any nonprofit > community organization, fraternal, benevolent, educational, > philanthropic, or service organization, or governmental > employee organization which, solicits or obtains > contributions solicited from the public for charitable > purposes or holds any assets for charitable purposes. > Thus, the girls formed a charitable organization sold lemonade. Seth << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| | |||
| |||
| "William Brenner" <wbrenner[at]nospamplease.net> wrote: - quote - > Can we safely assume that the parents provided the capital
Thus the parents donated items to the charitable> expended to purchase the lemons, the sugar, the cups and > even the water? They most likely also physically purchased > the raw materials at the grocery store. They might even have > participated in making the lemonade. organization, and can deduct the value of those items. - quote - > The girls, who thus had no monetary investment in the
as an unincorporated association, with the sole purpose of> project, volunteered their time and effort to market the > lemonade. charity. per Calif. Business and Professions Code 17510.2. (d) "charity" shall include any person who, or any nonprofit community organization, fraternal, benevolent, educational, philanthropic, or service organization, or governmental employee organization which, solicits or obtains contributions solicited from the public for charitable purposes or holds any assets for charitable purposes. Thus, the girls formed a charitable organization - quote - > They turned the resulting revenue over to their
if this were true, the girls violated their duty, as a> parents, who then donated it. charity cannot gift away its charitable assets. To be proper, the girls could use the parents as a conduit to get the money where it belonged, but then the parents could not deduct the money, as it was not theirs. Think about the alternative - the girls formed a partnership, solicited money in the name of charity, were blown away by the amount of moeny they took in ($1200!), and decided - screw the charity, lets buy smokes and liquor. They could do that if they were a partnership, couldn't they? There is a reason there are state laws on the books dealing with such charitable endeavors. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Can we safely assume that the parents provided the capital expended to purchase the lemons, the sugar, the cups and even the water? They most likely also physically purchased the raw materials at the grocery store. They might even have participated in making the lemonade. The girls, who thus had no monetary investment in the project, volunteered their time and effort to market the lemonade. They turned the resulting revenue over to their parents, who then donated it. Would this scenario result in a disallowance of the parents' charitable deduction? Would this thread exist had the parents sold the lemonade? Of course, in today's legal climate, a hot-shot child welfare person might charge the parents under child labor and/or abuse laws. On a personal note, I must add that, had I been one of the parents, I would not have claimed a charitable deduction. Not because I -- a confessed tax amateur -- necessarily believe it to be illegal; but because I just would not feel right in doing so under the circumstances. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| Tags |
| relief, spell |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| MSN De Lux Portfolio showing wrong data In the "% Gain" and "Averege Cost" columns Fulvio Bizzaro: Hi, have a problem with the DeLux Portfolio: Since some days, from September 2008 the calculation in the Gain/Loss is not accurate: It is... | Microsoft Money | 8 | 10-05-2008 10:41 PM | |
| "news" and "fyi" links on the "Track My Portfolio" page tom: no longer work in my Money 2000. When I click them, I get "MSN Money-Page Not Found" and "The page you requested could not be found." But there is a... | Microsoft Money | 7 | 10-25-2007 11:34 PM | |
| Problem with keeping track of shared expenses, "His", "Hers", "Ours" and How much do I owe you? P.Constantineau: Hi all, My girlfriend and I are having trouble figuring how to use money 2005 to indicate us how much we owe each other. I have setup Money 2005... | Microsoft Money | 4 | 04-03-2006 02:01 PM | |
| How do you spell "relief"? Harlan Lunsford: maybe not a good subject after all, but if could mean tax relief to parents. I notice three of 11 year old girls opened a lemonade stand and... | Taxes | 24 | 09-20-2005 03:10 PM | |
| Money 2002 transaction status flags ("E", "C", "R") have all disappeared Nick Tonkin: Hi, After many months of using Money 2002, yesterday I suddenly noticed that the column in my resgister that shows the cleared status of each... | Microsoft Money | 4 | 02-28-2004 04:39 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |