|
#23
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > If this is so, and anyone can form a "charitable
Wouldn't you end up being a private foundation? > organization", then I hereby found "Myself" as a charitable > organization, and will use any and all donations for my > favorite charity. (Guess!) ![]() Josh << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#22
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > neither IRS approval nor the filing of IRS forms is required
You can do that, as long as the organization has a> > to form a new charitable organization, a new partnership, a > > new LLC, a new corporation, or a new individual taxpayer. > Not talking about the last four items of course. Just a > charitable organzation. > If this is so, and anyone can form a "charitable > organization", then I hereby found "Myself" as a charitable > organization, and will use any and all donations for my > favorite charity. (Guess!) legitimate charitable purpose. There may be some state requirements, though. - quote - > > If the girls gave the money to their parents as a "gift", it
That only works to the extent the girls created a for-profit> > is absolutely wrong. If they gave the money to their > > parents merely as a conduit to the Salvation Army, fine, but > > the parents could not properly claim the deduction, as it > > was not their money. > Nowhere did I hint that the gift would be a "conduit", only > that they would give the money to their parents, with > perhaps a simple request that the amounts be forwarded. > However as we all know, to be a gift, no strings should be > attached. organization. If it's a nonprofit, giving the proceeds to their parents is not a proper charitable purpose. - quote - > I stand by my three stage scenario as being completely above
I have some doubts that minor kids can legitimately give> board and legal. money to their parents - it's like a conflict of interest on the parents' part. Aside from that, I don't see a problem with it. Stu << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#21
| |||
| |||
| Harlan Lunsford <hlunsford[at]bellsouth.net> wrote: - quote - > Stuart A. Bronstein wrote:
Remember that there are two kinds of charitable> > Harlan Lunsford <hlunsford[at]bellsouth.net> wrote: > > Actually, I think that's wrong. The last time I checked > > (which was, admittedly, several years ago) you only needed > > to file if the organization was going to take in a certain > > amount of money (I think it was something like $5000 in the > > first year, $15,000 in the first two years or $25,000 in the > > first three years). > Okay, for IRS filing requirements, you're probably right. > But surely, something, somewhere, prevents 3 little girls > from being a charitable organization. An organization must > be a bit more formal methinks. organizations. As long as they're not trying to take in tax-deductible contributions, I don't see why not. - quote - > You're thinking of investment income. this is business
Thanks. I didn't remember that.> income. Stu << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#20
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > > > maybe not a good subject after all, but if could > > > > mean tax relief to parents. > > > > > > > I notice three of 11 year old girls opened a > > > > lemonade stand and raised about 1200$ for > > > > hurricane victims' relief. Great idea, I applaud > > > > their generosity. > > > > > > > So now, here we have a partnership of three, > > > > each dividing the income, which being only > > > > 400$ apiece if only income has no income nor > > > > SE tax consequences. > > wrong, you have a charitable organization, not a partnership. > Just how were these three kids selling lemonade a > "charitable organization"? Saying that "the > proceeds/profits of what I'm selling go to charity" does not > make one (or one's business) a "charitable organization" > > > > Each gives her parent the 400$ gift; under > > > > 11,000; no gift tax return need be filed. > > that's called fraud. A charitable organization cannot just > > gift away its funds. - quote - > Again -- where do you get the idea the kids were a
Besides, they were selling a product. Just make sure you> "charitable organization"? don't pay more than $250 for a lemonade ;-) << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#19
| |||
| |||
| Stuart A. Bronstein wrote: - quote - > Harlan Lunsford <hlunsford[at]bellsouth.net> wrote:
You work for the IRS, don't you?-!> > Three little girls banding together cannot even BE a > > charitable organization unless they file and receive IRS > > approval. Only then would the money raised belong to a > > charitable organization. > Actually, I think that's wrong. The last time I checked > (which was, admittedly, several years ago) you only needed > to file if the organization was going to take in a certain > amount of money (I think it was something like $5000 in the > first year, $15,000 in the first two years or $25,000 in the > first three years). > > Anyway, for the middle step not to be "fraud (as you put > > it)" the girls would need to understand the consequences of > > their action, i.e. giving the profits to the parents so they > > in turn could give to the Salvation Army. It's a good > > opportunity for teaching kids a valuable civic and tax > > lesson. > Since the girls were 11, doesn't the kiddie tax for kids > under 14 require the money they earned to go on the parents' > return anyway? << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#18
| |||
| |||
| "Rich Carreiro" <rlcarr[at]animato.arlington.ma.us> wrote: - quote - > "123go" <rejecto[at]rejcet.ccc> writes:
actually, yes it does. Check your state law.> Just how were these three kids selling lemonade a > "charitable organization"? Saying that "the > proceeds/profits of what I'm selling go to charity" does not > make one (or one's business) a "charitable organization" << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#17
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > Since the girls were 11, doesn't the kiddie tax for kids
Kiddie tax applies only to investment income, not income> under 14 require the money they earned to go on the parents' > return anyway? from working or running a business. And only interest and dividends can go on the parents' return. If the child has any other type of income, she has to file her own return. The interest and dividends are never REQUIRED to go on the parents' return. That's just an option to reduce the paperwork a little if the child has no other income. The child's investment income is taxed at the parents' rate, whether it is reported on the parents' return or a separate return for the child. If they do choose to put the child's interest and dividends on the parents' return, that doesn't make it the parents' income. It still belongs to the child. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#16
| |||
| |||
| Stuart A. Bronstein wrote: - quote - > Harlan Lunsford <hlunsford[at]bellsouth.net> wrote:
The form is Form 1023, and it only needs to be filed if your> > Three little girls banding together cannot even BE a > > charitable organization unless they file and receive IRS > > approval. Only then would the money raised belong to a > > charitable organization. > Actually, I think that's wrong. The last time I checked > (which was, admittedly, several years ago) you only needed > to file if the organization was going to take in a certain > amount of money (I think it was something like $5000 in the > first year, $15,000 in the first two years or $25,000 in the > first three years). receipts are greater than $5,000 in a tax year. Of course, if you want to get the IRS letter acknowledging your 501(c)3 status, you file the form. - quote - > > Anyway, for the middle step not to be "fraud (as you put
No. There is nothing in the law that REQUIRES a child's> > it)" the girls would need to understand the consequences of > > their action, i.e. giving the profits to the parents so they > > in turn could give to the Salvation Army. It's a good > > opportunity for teaching kids a valuable civic and tax > > lesson. > Since the girls were 11, doesn't the kiddie tax for kids > under 14 require the money they earned to go on the parents' > return anyway? income to be reported on the parents return. The Kiddie tax only requires that investment income over $1600 be taxed at the parent's tax RATE, but on the child's return. See form 8615 for how to calculate the tax. Since selling lemonade is not an "investment", the point is moot under these circumstances. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#15
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > Since the girls were 11, doesn't the kiddie tax for kids
Kiddie tax applies only to investment income, not income> under 14 require the money they earned to go on the parents' > return anyway? from working or running a business. And only interest and dividends can go on the parents' return. If the child has any other type of income, she has to file her own return. The interest and dividends are never REQUIRED to go on the parents' return. That's just an option to reduce the paperwork a little if the child has no other income. The child's investment income is taxed at the parents' rate, whether it is reported on the parents' return or a separate return for the child. If they do choose to put the child's interest and dividends on the parents' return, that doesn't make it the parents' income. It still belongs to the child. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#14
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > Wow! thanks for the attempt at humor.
Well you sure fooled me.> I am absolutely serious. - quote - > > Three little girls banding together cannot even BE a
Not talking about the last four items of course. Just a> > charitable organization unless they file and receive IRS > > approval. Only then would the money raised belong to a > > charitable organization. > neither IRS approval nor the filing of IRS forms is required > to form a new charitable organization, a new partnership, a > new LLC, a new corporation, or a new individual taxpayer. charitable organzation. If this is so, and anyone can form a "charitable organization", then I hereby found "Myself" as a charitable organization, and will use any and all donations for my favorite charity. (Guess!) (snipped) - quote - > > Anyway, for the middle step not to be "fraud (as you put
Nowhere did I hint that the gift would be a "conduit", only> > it)" the girls would need to understand the consequences of > > their action, i.e. giving the profits to the parents so they > > in turn could give to the Salvation Army. It's a good > > opportunity for teaching kids a valuable civic and tax > > lesson. > If the girls gave the money to their parents as a "gift", it > is absolutely wrong. If they gave the money to their > parents merely as a conduit to the Salvation Army, fine, but > the parents could not properly claim the deduction, as it > was not their money. that they would give the money to their parents, with perhaps a simple request that the amounts be forwarded. However as we all know, to be a gift, no strings should be attached. I stand by my three stage scenario as being completely above board and legal. ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| Stuart A. Bronstein wrote: - quote - > Harlan Lunsford <hlunsford[at]bellsouth.net> wrote:
Okay, for IRS filing requirements, you're probably right.> > Three little girls banding together cannot even BE a > > charitable organization unless they file and receive IRS > > approval. Only then would the money raised belong to a > > charitable organization. > Actually, I think that's wrong. The last time I checked > (which was, admittedly, several years ago) you only needed > to file if the organization was going to take in a certain > amount of money (I think it was something like $5000 in the > first year, $15,000 in the first two years or $25,000 in the > first three years). But surely, something, somewhere, prevents 3 little girls from being a charitable organization. An organization must be a bit more formal methinks. - quote - > > Anyway, for the middle step not to be "fraud (as you put
You're thinking of investment income. this is business> > it)" the girls would need to understand the consequences of > > their action, i.e. giving the profits to the parents so they > > in turn could give to the Salvation Army. It's a good > > opportunity for teaching kids a valuable civic and tax > > lesson. > Since the girls were 11, doesn't the kiddie tax for kids > under 14 require the money they earned to go on the parents' > return anyway? income. ChEAr$, Harlan << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| "Stuart A. Bronstein" <spamtrap[at]lexregia.com> writes: - quote - > Since the girls were 11, doesn't the kiddie tax for kids
No. The "kiddie tax" applies to investment income, not> under 14 require the money they earned to go on the parents' > return anyway? earned income. -- Rich Carreiro rlcarr[at]animato.arlington.ma.us << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > Wow! thanks for the attempt at humor.
I am absolutely serious.- quote - > Three little girls banding together cannot even BE a
neither IRS approval nor the filing of IRS forms is required> charitable organization unless they file and receive IRS > approval. Only then would the money raised belong to a > charitable organization. to form a new charitable organization, a new partnership, a new LLC, a new corporation, or a new individual taxpayer. - quote - > How on earth did you arrive at your "opinion"?
common sense, and the law.- quote - > Anyway, for the middle step not to be "fraud (as you put
If the girls gave the money to their parents as a "gift", it> it)" the girls would need to understand the consequences of > their action, i.e. giving the profits to the parents so they > in turn could give to the Salvation Army. It's a good > opportunity for teaching kids a valuable civic and tax > lesson. is absolutely wrong. If they gave the money to their parents merely as a conduit to the Salvation Army, fine, but the parents could not properly claim the deduction, as it was not their money. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > > > So now, here we have a partnership of three,
not all charitable organizations qualify as tax exempt or> > > > each dividing the income, which being only > > > > 400$ apiece if only income has no income nor > > > > SE tax consequences. > > wrong, you have a charitable organization, not a partnership. > Wrong: try donating to that "charitable organization" and > see if you can deduct it. You have a business that has > promised that its proceeds (or profits; not clear from the > post) would be donated to charity. tax deductible charities. But under state law, they must fulfill their charitable purposes. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| Harlan Lunsford <hlunsford[at]bellsouth.net> wrote: - quote - > Three little girls banding together cannot even BE a
Actually, I think that's wrong. The last time I checked> charitable organization unless they file and receive IRS > approval. Only then would the money raised belong to a > charitable organization. (which was, admittedly, several years ago) you only needed to file if the organization was going to take in a certain amount of money (I think it was something like $5000 in the first year, $15,000 in the first two years or $25,000 in the first three years). - quote - > Anyway, for the middle step not to be "fraud (as you put
Since the girls were 11, doesn't the kiddie tax for kids> it)" the girls would need to understand the consequences of > their action, i.e. giving the profits to the parents so they > in turn could give to the Salvation Army. It's a good > opportunity for teaching kids a valuable civic and tax > lesson. under 14 require the money they earned to go on the parents' return anyway? Stu << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > > maybe not a good subject after all, but if could
Wrong: try donating to that "charitable organization" and> > > mean tax relief to parents. > > > > > I notice three of 11 year old girls opened a > > > lemonade stand and raised about 1200$ for > > > hurricane victims' relief. Great idea, I applaud > > > their generosity. > > > > > So now, here we have a partnership of three, > > > each dividing the income, which being only > > > 400$ apiece if only income has no income nor > > > SE tax consequences. > wrong, you have a charitable organization, not a partnership. see if you can deduct it. You have a business that has promised that its proceeds (or profits; not clear from the post) would be donated to charity. - quote - > > > Each gives her parent the 400$ gift; under
Fortunately, it isn't a charitable organization.> > > 11,000; no gift tax return need be filed. > that's called fraud. A charitable organization cannot just > gift away its funds. - quote - > > > The parents, in the 33% federal and say 7%
The three 11 year olds? But they don't have bank accounts,> > > state bracket donate said gifts to the Salvation > > > Army and save 480$ in taxes. > again, fraud. that is not their money, it belongs to the > charitable organization, which would make it hard for them to transfer the money directly to the charity. - quote - > which must do its intended charity
Which is precisely what happened: the money went to> with it - i.e. give to hurricane relief. hurricane relief, via the parents' bank accounts (the only effective way to get it there). Seth << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > > maybe not a good subject after all, but if could
Wow! thanks for the attempt at humor.> > > mean tax relief to parents. > > > > > I notice three of 11 year old girls opened a > > > lemonade stand and raised about 1200$ for > > > hurricane victims' relief. Great idea, I applaud > > > their generosity. > > > > > So now, here we have a partnership of three, > > > each dividing the income, which being only > > > 400$ apiece if only income has no income nor > > > SE tax consequences. > wrong, you have a charitable organization, not a partnership. > > > Each gives her parent the 400$ gift; under > > > 11,000; no gift tax return need be filed. > that's called fraud. A charitable organization cannot just > gift away its funds. > > > The parents, in the 33% federal and say 7% > > > state bracket donate said gifts to the Salvation > > > Army and save 480$ in taxes. > again, fraud. that is not their money, it belongs to the > charitable organization, which must do its intended charity > with it - i.e. give to hurricane relief. Three little girls banding together cannot even BE a charitable organization unless they file and receive IRS approval. Only then would the money raised belong to a charitable organization. How on earth did you arrive at your "opinion"? Anyway, for the middle step not to be "fraud (as you put it)" the girls would need to understand the consequences of their action, i.e. giving the profits to the parents so they in turn could give to the Salvation Army. It's a good opportunity for teaching kids a valuable civic and tax lesson. ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| "123go" <rejecto[at]rejcet.ccc> writes: - quote - > > > maybe not a good subject after all, but if could
Just how were these three kids selling lemonade a> > > mean tax relief to parents. > > > > > I notice three of 11 year old girls opened a > > > lemonade stand and raised about 1200$ for > > > hurricane victims' relief. Great idea, I applaud > > > their generosity. > > > > > So now, here we have a partnership of three, > > > each dividing the income, which being only > > > 400$ apiece if only income has no income nor > > > SE tax consequences. > wrong, you have a charitable organization, not a partnership. "charitable organization"? Saying that "the proceeds/profits of what I'm selling go to charity" does not make one (or one's business) a "charitable organization" - quote - > > > Each gives her parent the 400$ gift; under
Again -- where do you get the idea the kids were a> > > 11,000; no gift tax return need be filed. > that's called fraud. A charitable organization cannot just > gift away its funds. "charitable organization"? -- Rich Carreiro rlcarr[at]animato.arlington.ma.us << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > > maybe not a good subject after all, but if could
The above reply is false, as it stems from the erroneous> > > mean tax relief to parents. > > > > > I notice three of 11 year old girls opened a > > > lemonade stand and raised about 1200$ for > > > hurricane victims' relief. Great idea, I applaud > > > their generosity. > > > > > So now, here we have a partnership of three, > > > each dividing the income, which being only > > > 400$ apiece if only income has no income nor > > > SE tax consequences. > wrong, you have a charitable organization, not a partnership. > > > Each gives her parent the 400$ gift; under > > > 11,000; no gift tax return need be filed. > that's called fraud. A charitable organization cannot just > gift away its funds. > > > The parents, in the 33% federal and say 7% > > > state bracket donate said gifts to the Salvation > > > Army and save 480$ in taxes. > again, fraud. that is not their money, it belongs to the > charitable organization, which must do its intended charity > with it - i.e. give to hurricane relief. assumption that three girls with a lemonade stand is a "charitable organization" and not a business. It isn't a charitable organization (able to accept deductible contributions) unless the IRS says it is (under section 501(c)3 ). << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > maybe not a good subject after all, but if could
wrong, you have a charitable organization, not a partnership.> > mean tax relief to parents. > > > I notice three of 11 year old girls opened a > > lemonade stand and raised about 1200$ for > > hurricane victims' relief. Great idea, I applaud > > their generosity. > > > So now, here we have a partnership of three, > > each dividing the income, which being only > > 400$ apiece if only income has no income nor > > SE tax consequences. - quote - > > Each gives her parent the 400$ gift; under
that's called fraud. A charitable organization cannot just> > 11,000; no gift tax return need be filed. gift away its funds. - quote - > > The parents, in the 33% federal and say 7%
again, fraud. that is not their money, it belongs to the> > state bracket donate said gifts to the Salvation > > Army and save 480$ in taxes. charitable organization, which must do its intended charity with it - i.e. give to hurricane relief. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| Tags |
| relief, spell |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| MSN De Lux Portfolio showing wrong data In the "% Gain" and "Averege Cost" columns Fulvio Bizzaro: Hi, have a problem with the DeLux Portfolio: Since some days, from September 2008 the calculation in the Gain/Loss is not accurate: It is... | Microsoft Money | 8 | 10-05-2008 10:41 PM | |
| "news" and "fyi" links on the "Track My Portfolio" page tom: no longer work in my Money 2000. When I click them, I get "MSN Money-Page Not Found" and "The page you requested could not be found." But there is a... | Microsoft Money | 7 | 10-25-2007 11:34 PM | |
| Problem with keeping track of shared expenses, "His", "Hers", "Ours" and How much do I owe you? P.Constantineau: Hi all, My girlfriend and I are having trouble figuring how to use money 2005 to indicate us how much we owe each other. I have setup Money 2005... | Microsoft Money | 4 | 04-03-2006 02:01 PM | |
| Money 2002 transaction status flags ("E", "C", "R") have all disappeared Nick Tonkin: Hi, After many months of using Money 2002, yesterday I suddenly noticed that the column in my resgister that shows the cleared status of each... | Microsoft Money | 4 | 02-28-2004 04:39 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |