|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Jerzy wrote: - quote - > Thanks for your responses. However, I didn't mention that I
Your OP stated you were discussing an IRA and wanted to know> want to withdraw only my contributions. This is Roth IRA and > I want to confirm that there wouldn't be any penalties or > tax due. Also, the custodian wants me to indicate the type > of the distribution (qualified, non-qualified, etc.). Am I > correct in assuming that this would be a "qualified > distribution"? Thanks. if you could still avail yourself of the exception for first home buyers. This post is a completely new discussion. Qualified distributions and Withdrawal of original contributions from a Roth IRA are never taxable. If not taxable, there can not be a penalty as 10% times zero = zero. The owner of the account is not the one who specifies whether a distribution is qualified or not. It is the trustee that makes the determination. In addition, once again you have not provided all the facts necessary to determine whether your distribution is qualified or not. The point is moot anyhow if you only withdraw original contributions. Try reading IRS Pub 590 that explains all the ins and outs of Roth IRAs. http://www.irs.gov/publications/index.html -- Alan http://taxtopics.net << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Thanks Phil and Allan. Yes, my intention was to withdraw only my contributions. I did it today over the phone and I was not even asked about anything related to IRA. I guess you're right they're going to determine the distribution type although I'm pretty sure they were asking to fill in a form when I attempted to withdraw funds online (for some strange reason they (Scottrade) removed that online option and asked to call instead). << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Jerzy wrote: - quote - > Thanks for your responses. However, I didn't mention that I
Your OP stated you were discussing an IRA and wanted to know> want to withdraw only my contributions. This is Roth IRA and > I want to confirm that there wouldn't be any penalties or > tax due. Also, the custodian wants me to indicate the type > of the distribution (qualified, non-qualified, etc.). Am I > correct in assuming that this would be a "qualified > distribution"? Thanks. if you could still avail yourself of the exception for first home buyers. This post is a completely new discussion. Qualified distributions and Withdrawal of original contributions from a Roth IRA are never taxable. If not taxable, there can not be a penalty as 10% times zero = zero. The owner of the account is not the one who specifies whether a distribution is qualified or not. It is the trustee that makes the determination. In addition, once again you have not provided all the facts necessary to determine whether your distribution is qualified or not. The point is moot anyhow if you only withdraw original contributions. Try reading IRS Pub 590 that explains all the ins and outs of Roth IRAs. http://www.irs.gov/publications/index.html -- Alan http://taxtopics.net << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| "Jerzy" <javaguy1974[at]hotmail.com> wrote: - quote - > Thanks for your responses. However, I didn't mention
That's why "maybe" is usually a surefire correct answer tothe first statement of any tax question. - quote - > that I
You can withdraw Roth contributions at any time without> want to withdraw only my contributions. This is Roth IRA and > I want to confirm that there wouldn't be any penalties or > tax due. owing any tax or penalty. See IRS Publication 590. - quote - > Also, the custodian wants me to indicate the type
Maybe. (Ta da!) But I doubt it.> of the distribution (qualified, non-qualified, etc.). Am I > correct in assuming that this would be a "qualified > distribution"? If you're under 59 1/2, given the facts in your OP, this will be a "nonqualified" distribution. You'll report it and calculate your taxable portion (zero) in Part III of Form 8606. Not all nonqualified distributions are taxable or subject to penalty. -- Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Thanks for your responses. However, I didn't mention that I want to withdraw only my contributions. This is Roth IRA and I want to confirm that there wouldn't be any penalties or tax due. Also, the custodian wants me to indicate the type of the distribution (qualified, non-qualified, etc.). Am I correct in assuming that this would be a "qualified distribution"? Thanks. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Jerzy wrote: - quote - > I heard that IRA funds can be used toward a purchase of the
It is way too late. You had 120 days from the closing to> first home without incurring a penalty. I bought my first > home (condo) in March 2005. However, I didn't sell and use > IRA money at that time. Now I realized that it would be > better for me liquidate my and my wife's IRA accounts and > use the money to pay a portion of the mortgage. Is it too > late to do this without incurring the 10% penalty? Thanks. use the IRA funds for the acquisition. In addition, the amount is limited to $10,000 over your lifetime. -- Alan http://taxtopics.net << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| | |||
| |||
| Jerzy wrote: - quote - > I heard that IRA funds can be used toward a purchase of the
Yes, it is too late. The withdrawal has to occur no more> first home without incurring a penalty. I bought my first > home (condo) in March 2005. However, I didn't sell and use > IRA money at that time. Now I realized that it would be > better for me liquidate my and my wife's IRA accounts and > use the money to pay a portion of the mortgage. Is it too > late to do this without incurring the 10% penalty? Thanks. than 120 days before closing, and cannot be used to pay down the mortgage. You can read about it in IRS Pub 590. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I heard that IRA funds can be used toward a purchase of the first home without incurring a penalty. I bought my first home (condo) in March 2005. However, I didn't sell and use IRA money at that time. Now I realized that it would be better for me liquidate my and my wife's IRA accounts and use the money to pay a portion of the mortgage. Is it too late to do this without incurring the 10% penalty? Thanks. << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| Tags |
| buying, home, ira, selling, tax, year |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Investments - Buying and Selling on the Same Day Howard: I sometimes buy and sell a stock on the same day using Fidelity as the broker. When I download the information the next day, Money Plus... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 04-29-2008 01:36 PM | |
| Tax consequences for buying and selling a home FE: Let's say you are over 55, married, no kids at home, and you sold your home in State "C" for $589,000 in September 2003. What would be the tax... | Taxes | 4 | 03-18-2005 12:04 PM | |
| Selling stock & buying new one without having to pay Taxes kaulam@hotmail.com: OK I am a newbie at this stuff. I have some stock investment which I want to exchange for a stock in a different company now. As I understand it,... | Taxes | 5 | 01-03-2004 03:56 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |