|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "Bruce Nelson" <bruce_nelson13[at]comcast.net> wrote: - quote - > Here is something I haven't seen before:
Does he intend to ultimately return to Nebraska?> Taxpayer's job is eliminated in Nebraska, but he is offered > a comparable position with the same company in Texas. He > moves to Texas in Sept 2003 where he leases an apartment. He > renews his Neb driver's license in Feb 2004 and votes by > absentee ballot in November 2004. Early in 2005 he gets a > Texas driver's license and buys a car that is registered in > Texas. > He claims he is a residence of Texas and should not have to > pay tax on his income to Nebraska. But here is the kicker. > He still has two homes in Nebraska (one is a vacation home - > yeah, I know --I wouldn't have a vaction home in Nebraska > either) and his wife and children still live there! And no, > he has not abandoned his wife or children. He is happily > married and wants to let his kids finish high school there. > My immediate reaction is that while he has taken steps to > create residency in Texas, he has not abandoned his domicile > in Nebraska; thus he remains a Neb resident for income tax > purposes. Any thoughts, comments? -- David M. Woods, EA, ChFC, CLU Woods Financial Services Norwood, MA 02062 www.woods-financial.com << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Katie wrote: - quote - > Nebraska defines a resident to include every person who is
Okay, Katie.... what's a "clummock"?> domiciled in Nebraska. The regulation says that every > person domiciled in Nebraska is a resident, "even while > absent for temporary or transitory purposes." I can't find > much case law in Nebraska on the subject of residence or > domicile (maybe it's just my research service acting up this > morning). It's possible that the language of the regulation > might give this individual a clummock to stand on in the > swamp, viz: My absence is not for temporary purposes, > because I have accepted employment in Texas that has no > fixed termination date. Therefore I am not a resident as > described in the regulation. > I would agree with you that he has not established a new > domicile in Texas, and remains domiciled in Nebraska. > However, if we tweak the facts just a little bit, we might > reach the opposite conclusion. What if the intention of > this family is to make a permanent move to Texas as soon as > the kids are through high school? Suppose they plan to buy > a home in Texas as soon as they can sell their primary home > in Nebraska? Suppose he registers to vote and actually votes > in Texas? (And a vacation home on a lake in Nebraska might > be a pretty good deal if you lived in Texas <G> .) Then > maybe HE has changed his domicile to Texas, while his wife > and kids remain domiciled in Nebraska. It could happen. > Katie in San Diego -- Alan http://taxtopics.net << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| | |||
| |||
| Nebraska defines a resident to include every person who is domiciled in Nebraska. The regulation says that every person domiciled in Nebraska is a resident, "even while absent for temporary or transitory purposes." I can't find much case law in Nebraska on the subject of residence or domicile (maybe it's just my research service acting up this morning). It's possible that the language of the regulation might give this individual a clummock to stand on in the swamp, viz: My absence is not for temporary purposes, because I have accepted employment in Texas that has no fixed termination date. Therefore I am not a resident as described in the regulation. I would agree with you that he has not established a new domicile in Texas, and remains domiciled in Nebraska. However, if we tweak the facts just a little bit, we might reach the opposite conclusion. What if the intention of this family is to make a permanent move to Texas as soon as the kids are through high school? Suppose they plan to buy a home in Texas as soon as they can sell their primary home in Nebraska? Suppose he registers to vote and actually votes in Texas? (And a vacation home on a lake in Nebraska might be a pretty good deal if you lived in Texas <G> .) Then maybe HE has changed his domicile to Texas, while his wife and kids remain domiciled in Nebraska. It could happen. Katie in San Diego << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Here is something I haven't seen before: Taxpayer's job is eliminated in Nebraska, but he is offered a comparable position with the same company in Texas. He moves to Texas in Sept 2003 where he leases an apartment. He renews his Neb driver's license in Feb 2004 and votes by absentee ballot in November 2004. Early in 2005 he gets a Texas driver's license and buys a car that is registered in Texas. He claims he is a residence of Texas and should not have to pay tax on his income to Nebraska. But here is the kicker. He still has two homes in Nebraska (one is a vacation home - yeah, I know --I wouldn't have a vaction home in Nebraska either) and his wife and children still live there! And no, he has not abandoned his wife or children. He is happily married and wants to let his kids finish high school there. My immediate reaction is that while he has taken steps to create residency in Texas, he has not abandoned his domicile in Nebraska; thus he remains a Neb resident for income tax purposes. Any thoughts, comments? << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| Tags |
| domicile, residency, versus |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Changing Domicile from VA to FL Charles Goodman: I'm looking for some advice on how to change my domicile from VA before taking an overseas job. My family and I moved to Virginia from Florida in... | Taxes | 6 | 08-17-2005 12:37 AM | |
| California Residency Question Jim Jensen: California R&T Code Sec 17014 states: "For any taxable year beginning on or after January 1, 1994, any individual domiciled in this state who is... | Taxes | 1 | 04-19-2005 02:56 PM | |
| NY residency Brian Devlin: My daughter's permanent home is in RI. She currently attends college in Elmira, NY. She works in both RI and NY, and pays income taxes to both... | Taxes | 2 | 02-25-2004 02:45 PM | |
| Source closing for UK non-domicile Bob Brown: ============================================================ Moderator's comment: This newsgroup is open to univere-wide tax questions. The only... | Taxes | 1 | 09-14-2003 11:10 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |