|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Thanks to everyone who took the time to reply. I appreciate the comments about how the return could have been filed rather than the extension. It sounds like a combination of mediocre screen layout and end-of-tax-season human error. It's my wife's SEP, and she deals with the accountant, but I think the master plan is to follow Frank's last suggestion. I agree with the comment that we aren't really losing the full $5000 because we'd pay taxes on it eventually, and that makes me feel a little better, but: 1) we lose the benefit of the tax-deferred earnings on the investment, 2) our tax bracket should be lower when we retire, and 3) it just shouldn't have happened. Thanks again--- Rick << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Frank S. Duke, Jr. wrote: - quote - > Hard to believe the IRS would accept an unsigned return.
I think the issue is that the preparer, in attempting to> They return them all the time. e-file the extension, accidentally e-filed the return. On my computer, those two choices are adjacent, and the following screens look similar. If your software defaults to a computer-generated PIN and the computer date as signature date, the return will look to the IRS like a valid, signed tax return. It's scarily easy for me to believe both that the preparer could accidentally screw it up and that the IRS would happily accept and process the return. I'm with you that the e-filed "return" isn't an actual return, any more than a paper-filed return would be if the preparer had forged the taxpayers' signatures (which is essentially what happened). But the issue isn't did he file; it's can he make the SEP contribution when the return hasn't been extended. I'd like to amend my previous comment, which essentially said "No extension, no SEP." If the OP is so inclined, try filing a 2nd extension request (Form 2688), and check the "didn't file a 4868" box. Fully explain your hardship in item 2, and attach a letter from the preparer saying they screwed up. If you get it back with either "we have approved" or "we have not approved, but you have 10 days," I think you're good on the SEP, as long as you make it within the new deadline. Phoebe ![]() << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| r_olson[at]sandiego.edu at r_olson[at]sandiego.edu wrote: - quote - > Last April we asked our accountant to file a tax extention
What a cheesy excuse to weasel out of responsibility. While> for the 2004 taxes.... > - Accountant worked on taxes last week and looked into the > reason for the $30K refund. It turns out that an > "incomplete return" was filed instead of an extention. She > says that it was a software error.... all accountants make mistakes, their professional responsibility is to own up to them, not blame some inanimate computer program. Do you think "software error" would have exonerated Lee Hazelwood for running the Exxon Valdez aground. The captain is responsible for where the ship goes, no matter what. When you file an electronic extension, you get an acknowledgement, just like you do for a return. If it was done over the phone, you get a confirmation number. If it was done by snail mail, why did you pay an accountant? You could have screwed that up on your own. - quote - > This has to be done by filing an amended return because NO
Hard to believe the IRS would accept an unsigned return.> EXTENSION AS EVER FILED. (Of course, I didn't sign the > "return" that was filed, so I don't know how that fits in > here) They return them all the time. - quote - > I'm ok with the $14K. They gave us too much back, so we owe
You bet she should!> them some. Our accountant will pay any penalties because it > was her error (or her programs). - quote - > Still at issue is the SEP-IRA. At first she said we could
I think I would send a letter to the IRS explaining your> put $12K into the SEP. My wife asked whether that was still > possible because the IRS thinks we filed a return and not an > extension. Consequently, the deadline for the SEP > contribution should have been April 15; which we missed. > Not funding the SEP will cost us about $5000 in US and CA > taxes. uncertainty about whether or not you files and list the chain of events as you saw it. Ask them directly for clarification about your situation. Do it in writing so you have a response from them on paper. Not funding the SEP is really not as bad as you think. Yes, you will lose the benefits of tax deferral but that is all it is, deferral. You will eventually pay tax on that money. I suspect the difference is greater than $0 but a lot less than the full $5000. What it will cost you is $5000 this year vs. some amount in the distant future. All freely provided advice guarantee correct or double your money back Frank S. Duke, Jr. CPA Cincinnati, OH USA << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| | |||
| |||
| r_olson[at]sandiego.edu wrote: - quote - > the IRS thinks we filed a return and not an
IMHO, what was filed was not legally a return, because you> extension. Consequently, the deadline for the SEP > contribution should have been April 15; which we missed. > Not funding the SEP will cost us about $5000 in US and CA > taxes. didn't sign it. However, the lack of extension precludes the SEP. - quote - > What
Assuming they catch the error (which we have to assume,> are the chances that the IRS will allow the extension and > not penalize us for making an illegal contribution. because you can't take a position based on "audit lottery"), I'd say slim but nonzero. I suggest: Make no SEP contribution, calculate the financial damage, and request your preparer make you whole. The damage isn't the amount of tax savings you lose, because the withdrawal will be taxable in the end. It's some amount based on the loss of tax deferral on the contribution and earnings. If it (plus the penalties your preparer has already agreed to pay) are large, the preparer's malpractice coverage will pick up a portion. Alternatively, you could have your preparer pay for a PLR regarding whether you could make the contribution. This is likely to be more expensive, even if the IRS allows the SEP. (This makes me glad I don't use the software default that says "use computer date as signature date." If I don't key in a signature date manually, I can't e-file a return, but can e-file an extension. Sometimes a little inefficiency will save you.) Phoebe ![]() << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Last April we asked our accountant to file a tax extention for the 2004 taxes. At the time we hadn't put anything into my wife's SEP. We were waiting for the accountant to do the return to tell us how much to put into the account. Since then several things have not gone according to plan. To whit: - April, Asked accoutant to file for extension. Paid $20,000 in 2004 taxes "just in case" - Late May, received letter from IRS stating we'd overpaid our taxes and would be receiving *a check* with $30K refund. At this time we were still thinking we we sitting on an extension. - June: Sent $10,000 to IRS saying to apply it to out 2004 taxes. - July: Received bank statement indicating that IRS refunded the $30K electronically. - Accountant worked on taxes last week and looked into the reason for the $30K refund. It turns out that an "incomplete return" was filed instead of an extention. She says that it was a software error. The "Good news" is that the IRS received our $10,000 and applied it to the 1st Qtr 2005 taxes. (The check had 2004 1040 written on it). Based on her read of the situation, we now owe $14K in 2004 taxes. This has to be done by filing an amended return because NO EXTENSION AS EVER FILED. (Of course, I didn't sign the "return" that was filed, so I don't know how that fits in here) I'm ok with the $14K. They gave us too much back, so we owe them some. Our accountant will pay any penalties because it was her error (or her programs). Still at issue is the SEP-IRA. At first she said we could put $12K into the SEP. My wife asked whether that was still possible because the IRS thinks we filed a return and not an extension. Consequently, the deadline for the SEP contribution should have been April 15; which we missed. Not funding the SEP will cost us about $5000 in US and CA taxes. Today the Accountant replied: "Technically, the SEP contribution would not be allowed. However, I suggest you make the contribution and I can fight it based on the problems encountered with the extension filing." At this point I'm leery about that course of action. What are the chances that the IRS will allow the extension and not penalize us for making an illegal contribution. Thanks for your help-- Rick << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| Tags |
| impact, incomplete or extended, return, sepira, tax |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| SF Registration and Hotel Deadline Extended TaxService: We are pleased to announce that the San Francisco Tax Forum Hotel and Registration Deadline has been extended to Monday, June 20th. This means you... | Taxes | 3 | 06-14-2005 04:05 AM | |
| filing taxes while on extended overseas trip? Jean S. Barto: Hi folks-- I'm just curious about how folks who are traveling overseas on an extended basis handle filing their taxes. Do they just forget... | Taxes | 6 | 06-02-2005 11:19 PM | |
| Extended view of Bills & Deposits? JC Perdigao: Hi all, My current view of Bills and Deposits only shows 1 month - how do I change it so I can see 3 months worth of upcoming Bills and Deposits?... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 02-27-2005 01:34 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |