|
#2
| |||
| |||
| This is the exact thing that happened to my clients just before their divorce was final. They even lived in separate states. They filed jointly because his business losses reduced their taxes so they could get her withholding refunded. She lived in the house and he remained on the title. When she sold the house, they filed a joint return claiming the full $500,000 exclusion and she bought a new house with the proceeds as agreed in the divorce. Divorce was final in the following year. He didn=92t have to live in the sold house but could use his wife=92s residence in it as his own, so full exclusion. Linda Dorfmont E.A., CFP, CSA << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << It may not be relied upon for the purpose of avoiding > << penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer or the > << tax preparer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| There is no need for a trust. Internal Revenue Code section 121(d)(3)(B) says the clock for use of the residence never starts running on the "out-spouse" as long as the "in-spouse" is using the home pursuant to a written instrument. Ownership is still evaluated in the same manner so there should be no transfer of title. In addition, under the California Family Code, the rental value of the residence may be taken into account as an adjustment in the calculation of support under some circumstances. Timothy E. Kelly Certified Specialist, Taxation Law State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << It may not be relied upon for the purpose of avoiding > << penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer or the > << tax preparer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
| | |||
| |||
| "AES" <siegman[at]stanford.edu> wrote: - quote - > California couple, community property house, divorce on the
The trust won't interefere with each owner's $250,000 gain> horizon. > If they were to put the house into a mutually established > revocable trust for a few years (to permit the kids to stay > in it with one parent until they're out of high school), > then sell, could each of them take their half of the > residential capital gain reduction on their separate returns > at that time? exemption as far as the ownership test is concerned. The use test clock will start ticking for the spouse who moves out when (s)he moves. Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD << ================================================== ===== > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << It may not be relied upon for the purpose of avoiding > << penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer or the > << tax preparer. > << > << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved. > << ================================================== ===== > |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| << General Disclaimer: > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << It cannot be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of > << avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer. > << ================================================== ===== > California couple, community property house, divorce on the horizon. If they were to put the house into a mutually established revocable trust for a few years (to permit the kids to stay in it with one parent until they're out of high school), then sell, could each of them take their half of the residential capital gain reduction on their separate returns at that time? (Purpose of the trust is just to park the house in a holding arrangement that's clearly defined and run by a neutral trustee, avoid potential conflicts during the holding period, sell and split equities at the end.) << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| capital, couple, gain, reduction, residential, separated |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Bond as capital gain Pinky: How can I make it so Money does not clasify bond sales as capital gains within a Monthly income and spending report? | Microsoft Money | 4 | 05-02-2008 12:11 AM | |
| Questions on Capital Gain Tax lha: Newsgroups: misc.invest.real-estate,misc.taxes.moderated THIS WAS NOT CROSSPOSTED. To all: can someone shed light for me on capital gain tax? ... | Taxes | 13 | 06-02-2005 06:21 PM | |
| capital gain on tickets? gypman: Had season tickets to San Diego Padres baseball games this past season. Of course I could not make all the games, so put them up for sale on e-bay.... | Taxes | 32 | 01-04-2005 07:40 AM | |
| Help: Capital Gain Tax Minh: I am California resident and sell a rental home in Washington State. I lived in this house for 1.5 years and renting for 3.5 years. Please let me... | Taxes | 1 | 12-21-2004 12:07 AM | |
| Capital Gain Tax Larry Bohen: We've owned a few rental condos since 1985. The condos are owned in our names (I.E. not a trust, corporation). The sale market is much hotter than... | Taxes | 2 | 08-19-2004 09:40 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |