|
#3
| |||
| |||
| << General Disclaimer: > << The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only > << and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. > << It cannot be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of > << avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer. > << ================================================== ===== > MTW" <mtwingcpa[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > Paul A Thomas wrote:
But not a simple tax, just a little less complex (assuming> > I've said it before, as many others have, this is a glimpse > > of a "flat tax". > I just read that the Treasury predicts, if things go > unchanged, the revenue generated by the AMT will exceed the > "regular" tax in 2012. Thereafter, it would be less > expensive for the government to repeal the regular tax. > So, I think the pattern is set: We are making a slow and > orderly conversion to a "flat" tax. they repeal the regular). << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Paul A Thomas wrote: - quote - > I've said it before, as many others have, this is a glimpse
I just read that the Treasury predicts, if things go> of a "flat tax". unchanged, the revenue generated by the AMT will exceed the "regular" tax in 2012. Thereafter, it would be less expensive for the government to repeal the regular tax. So, I think the pattern is set: We are making a slow and orderly conversion to a "flat" tax. MTW << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << Copyright (2005) - All rights reserved > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Drew Edmundson <drewsbeagles[at]hotmail.com> writes: - quote - > The tax rates required for tax neutrality, according to the
[SNIP]> Tax Policy Center are available at: > http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/TaxMo...F/T05-0079.pdf - quote - > The top rate would be 44% if all the burden was placed on
Has anyone done a study of what the rates required> the rate brackets above 25%. for revenue neutrality would be if the estate tax "exemption" amount was set at $5,000,000 or $10,000,000 instead of being repealed and the resulting income increment used to partially offset the cost of AMT repeal? -- Rich Carreiro rlcarr[at]animato.arlington.ma.us << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| "Drew Edmundson" <drewsbeagles[at]hotmail.com> wrote - quote - > The tax rates required for tax neutrality, according to the
I've said it before, as many others have, this is a glimpse> Tax Policy Center are available at: > http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/TaxMo...F/T05-0079.pdf > or > http://tinyurl.com/7884t > The top rate would be 44% if all the burden was placed on > the rate brackets above 25%. > Please remember, I am just the messenger. of a "flat tax". -- Paul A. Thomas, CPA Athens, Georgia taxman at negia.net << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| The tax rates required for tax neutrality, according to the Tax Policy Center are available at: http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/TaxMo...F/T05-0079.pdf or http://tinyurl.com/7884t The top rate would be 44% if all the burden was placed on the rate brackets above 25%. Please remember, I am just the messenger. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| amt, rates, repeal, tax |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Bush Has Until Nov. 2 To Sign ETI Repeal Bill Milt Baker: October 22, 2004 Bush Has Until November 2 to Sign ETI Repeal Bill President Bush on October 21 received H.R. 4520, a corporate tax cut... | Taxes | 1 | 10-26-2004 09:00 PM | |
| NYS Tax Rates John: Assuming I fall into the maximum tax brackets, what are the marginal tax rates for NYS and Federal taxes, both long term capital gains and earned.... | Taxes | 7 | 10-15-2004 12:28 AM | |
| Tax Rates in England DonBa: I have this curiosity about what the English pay in income taxes. What are the rates for the low, median, and high incomes; and what is the rate... | Taxes | 4 | 10-02-2004 10:49 AM | |
| M03 Tax rates for 2004 Retired Coal Miner: Can someone take a look at their version of M03 and see if the tax rates showing for '2004 Tax Year in Progress' are correct. Mine don't appear... | Microsoft Money | 4 | 01-06-2004 03:47 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |