|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Taxes3432 wrote: - quote - > For California (and any other states that do not conform to
You answered your own question in the last sentence. You may> bonus depreciation), what if you receive a federal and out > of state K-1 (no California K-1). The federal K-1 contains > say rental income which includes bonus depreciation. You > did not recieve a California K-1 because the partnership has > no nexus to California. You do not have any footnote > disclosures noting the amount of bonus depreciation. Are > you supposed to report the federal K-1 numbers for > California? But obviously it would be wrong as you are > reporting bonus depreciation somewhere in the rental income > figure which is not allowed under California law. not use the federal amount on the CA return. You have to obtain the necessary data and complete Form 3885A to make the adjustment. Don't look for FTB 3885A on the CA FTB website. Look for: Form 540 Schedule D/3885A. -- Alan http://taxtopics.net << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Taxes3432 wrote: - quote - > For California (and any other states that do not conform to
You need to contact the partnership to get the correct> bonus depreciation), what if you receive a federal and out > of state K-1 (no California K-1). The federal K-1 contains > say rental income which includes bonus depreciation. You > did not recieve a California K-1 because the partnership has > no nexus to California. You do not have any footnote > disclosures noting the amount of bonus depreciation. Are > you supposed to report the federal K-1 numbers for > California? But obviously it would be wrong as you are > reporting bonus depreciation somewhere in the rental income > figure which is not allowed under California law. information. Katie in San Diego The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| "Taxes3432" <Taxes3432[at]hotmail.comIRC> wrote: - quote - > For California (and any other states that do not conform to
You need to communicate with the partnership to have them> bonus depreciation), what if you receive a federal and out > of state K-1 (no California K-1). The federal K-1 contains > say rental income which includes bonus depreciation. You > did not recieve a California K-1 because the partnership has > no nexus to California. You do not have any footnote > disclosures noting the amount of bonus depreciation. Are > you supposed to report the federal K-1 numbers for > California? But obviously it would be wrong as you are > reporting bonus depreciation somewhere in the rental income > figure which is not allowed under California law. compute CA differences (most tax programs will do this when the preparer codes each partner with that person's state of residence). -- Tom Healy, CPA Boulder, CO Web: http://www.tomhealycpa.com << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| For California (and any other states that do not conform to bonus depreciation), what if you receive a federal and out of state K-1 (no California K-1). The federal K-1 contains say rental income which includes bonus depreciation. You did not recieve a California K-1 because the partnership has no nexus to California. You do not have any footnote disclosures noting the amount of bonus depreciation. Are you supposed to report the federal K-1 numbers for California? But obviously it would be wrong as you are reporting bonus depreciation somewhere in the rental income figure which is not allowed under California law. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| california, question |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| California Residency Question Jim Jensen: California R&T Code Sec 17014 states: "For any taxable year beginning on or after January 1, 1994, any individual domiciled in this state who is... | Taxes | 1 | 04-19-2005 02:56 PM | |
| California Amnesty Question G. Chilcote: I'm not a California CPA and haven't had a chance to review applicable law. I am hoping someone can point me in the right direction. My... | Taxes | 3 | 02-03-2005 05:08 PM | |
| California Tax Capital Gains Question Eric Cantona: Hi - I have the following situtaion was hoping to get some input: I reside in California with my wife and have for the last three years. Within... | Taxes | 2 | 11-14-2004 04:41 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |