|
#10
| |||
| |||
| "CB" <temp1[at]tomochka.com> writes: - quote - > each pointing to those sheets. I don't see how I could have
No, it probably wouldn't look like that. The gazillion> avoided adding those sheets even if I had filed all on > Sched. D, since it would simply look like made up numbers to > an agent. Sched D forms filed every year don't have anything attached to document basis and the IRS doesn't bat an eye. -- Rich Carreiro rlcarr[at]animato.arlington.ma.us << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| CB wrote: - quote - > At least with regard to stock acquired from a company stock
The following site at turbotax.com explains how to handle> purchase plan and disposed of in a disqualifying > disposition, IRS guidance doesn't line up with your rule of > thumb regarding 1099-Bs: > http://www.irs.gov/faqs/faq-kw183.html On the other hand, > they don't exactly tell you what/how you should account for > this "compensation income" on one's return, though it > clearly implies that in this case one doesn't use Sched. D. > Perhaps the rule of thumb should be qualified to say it > can't hurt to put everything on Sched. D, although they also > pegged me for my one qualifying disposition that I DID put > on Sched. D. Go figger. > At least I'm glad to see the confusion is not totally > confined to my brain. [And Phil, I didn't actually> "ignore" the 1099-B, I just didn't know how to properly > process it]. ESPP qualifying and disqualifying transactions: http://www.turbotax.com/articles/Emp...hasePlans.html The only element missing from the explanation is where to put the ordinary income component on the 1040 if not included on your W-2. Answer: It goes on Line 7, Wages. -- Alan http://taxtopics.net << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| MTW wrote: - quote - > Arthur Kamlet wrote:
OK, I'll admit to a bit of exaggeration. It was that many> > So instead of writing long explanations, and coming up with > > spreadsheets, most of all of which might be kicked back to > > you, just file the schedule D as you should have, to begin > > with. > I "second" your suggestion (and you beat me to it <grin> ). I > had the same reaction - that 15 pages of explanation could > likely cause more problems than it solves. This is an > example of where seeking professional advice BEFORE > responding to the IRS would have been advisable. pages, but 90% of them were simply transaction/invoices from the broker and company showing the basis and taxes withheld where applicable. The actual 4 explanations were a paragraph each pointing to those sheets. I don't see how I could have avoided adding those sheets even if I had filed all on Sched. D, since it would simply look like made up numbers to an agent. Perhaps it would have avoided the letter if I'd done that in the first place (albeit see previous post pointing to IRS FAQ that isn't even clear on that point), but at this point they are looking at it more closely. Cheers, C << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| "CB" <temp1[at]tomochka.com> writes: - quote - > At least with regard to stock acquired from a company stock
You don't have to do anything special. Your employer will> purchase plan and disposed of in a disqualifying > disposition, IRS guidance doesn't line up with your rule of > thumb regarding 1099-Bs: > http://www.irs.gov/faqs/faq-kw183.html On the other hand, > they don't exactly tell you what/how you should account for > this "compensation income" on one's return, though it > clearly implies that in this case one doesn't use Sched. D. report the wage income recognized by a ESPP disqualifying disposition on your W-2 in box 1. In other words, the Box 1 wages will already include the disposition "wages" so you need do nothing special to report them. And that URL you provides leads to something that is not particularly well-written and oversimplified. There's a world of relevant details behind that "generally" in the first line of the answer. Anyhow, you need to find out from your employer how much wage income you recognized on the disqualifying disposition. Add that to your actual purchase price to get your basis in the stock you sold. Subtract that from the sales proceeds to get your capital gain or loss. All that goes on Schedule D. Regardless of any "guidelines", it is a practical fact that if the IRS gets a 1099-B that you don't account for on a Sched D, it'll treat the sale as having zero basis and will take the entire sales proceeds as income. -- Rich Carreiro rlcarr[at]animato.arlington.ma.us << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| At least with regard to stock acquired from a company stock purchase plan and disposed of in a disqualifying disposition, IRS guidance doesn't line up with your rule of thumb regarding 1099-Bs: http://www.irs.gov/faqs/faq-kw183.html On the other hand, they don't exactly tell you what/how you should account for this "compensation income" on one's return, though it clearly implies that in this case one doesn't use Sched. D. Perhaps the rule of thumb should be qualified to say it can't hurt to put everything on Sched. D, although they also pegged me for my one qualifying disposition that I DID put on Sched. D. Go figger. At least I'm glad to see the confusion is not totally confined to my brain. [And Phil, I didn't actually"ignore" the 1099-B, I just didn't know how to properly process it]. Cheers, Casey << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| I may have made a mistake in calling the 1099 a 1099-B. I don't have the docs here with me at the moment. It didn't occur to me that I would file what is essentially a "frivolous" entry on Sched. D, showing a loss equal to the broker fee (less than a dollar in at least two cases). That would seem to require just as much explanation (pointing back to the W-2 amounts, cryptically labeled) as I have already done. I suppose, though that their letter was kicked off by a computer and repeating the information on the Sched. D would have avoided that. Although, in one item, shares acquired via the ESPP and held for more than two years, were also listed in the letter and those I DID put on Sched. D and correctly I might add, so there you go. Thanks for the advice. - C << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Arthur Kamlet wrote: - quote - > So instead of writing long explanations, and coming up with
I "second" your suggestion (and you beat me to it <grin> ). I> spreadsheets, most of all of which might be kicked back to > you, just file the schedule D as you should have, to begin > with. had the same reaction - that 15 pages of explanation could likely cause more problems than it solves. This is an example of where seeking professional advice BEFORE responding to the IRS would have been advisable. MTW << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| CB wrote: - quote - > For the first time in my 30+ years as a taxpayer I received
Without seeing your return, I am guessing that you failed to> an audit notice (for my 2003 return), more specifically a > letter audit (no office visit requested). It was not a great > way to start my weekend, getting a letter saying I owed them > about $13K in taxes, penalties and interest! But, as I> read on I realized all four items they were contesting were > relatively easy to explain and document. > They all derived from sales of my employer's stock via their > employee stock purchase plan or non-qualified options I > exercised. In the former case, the profit is reported on my > W-2 as ordinary income, and in the latter full fed/state > witholding is made and the amount of profit is reported on > my W-2. Unfortunately, the brokerage simple reports a 1099-B > of the gross proceeds, which is what the IRS is using to > base their claim (not having enough info to determine cost > basis). > Naively, I didn't supply any extra documentation with my > return supporting the cost basis, figuring it all got worked > out somehow since some withholding was made and the amounts > are on my W-2, plus I wanted to file electronically. My bad > as my teenage son would say! > So, with about 3 hours work I supplied about 15 pages of > supporting documentation along with an explanation of each > item and a summary spreadsheet and mailed that off in > response, certified return receipt (all within about 3 days > of receiving the notice). > What can I expect now? It *seems* straightforward to me and > my cover letter was cooperative and polite, and I'd expect a > reasonable person to quickly see that all was computed > correctly (well, there is about 50 bucks total difference on > $42K gross that I couldn't account for...) and close the > audit promptly. More naivete? > How long should I expect to receive a response one way or > another? What are the odds they will now check other years > for this apparent discrepancy? What are my options if they > insist on their point of view? Do I need to do anything with > respect to my state return (OR) now or do they wait for the > result of the audit? > Believe me, in the future I will pre-document these kinds of > items when I next file a return. Better than risking a > coronary! :^) report the sale of securities on Form 1040 Schedule D and the IRS is now using the gross proceeds of the sale to compute your tax. Any time you sell capital assets, you must report the sale. The amount on your W-2 represents the ordinary gain to be taxed at ordinary tax rates. You need to account for the capital gain or loss. The best way to answer the IRS would have been to file an amended return with the Schedule D attached. Your cost basis in the shares you sold are what you actually paid for the shares plus the amount reflected on your W-2 as ordinary income. -- Alan http://taxtopics.net << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "CB" <temp1[at]tomochka.com> wrote: - quote - > For the first time in my 30+ years as a taxpayer I received
A no change letter. You (and lurkers) can save a lot of> an audit notice (for my 2003 return), more specifically a > letter audit (no office visit requested). It was not a great > way to start my weekend, getting a letter saying I owed them > about $13K in taxes, penalties and interest! But, as I> read on I realized all four items they were contesting were > relatively easy to explain and document. > They all derived from sales of my employer's stock via their > employee stock purchase plan or non-qualified options I > exercised. > What can I expect now? trouble in the future by not ignoring 1099-B's. -- Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| CB wrote: - quote - > For the first time in my 30+ years as a taxpayer I received
Okay, what you should have done, was report the actual sale> an audit notice (for my 2003 return), more specifically a > letter audit (no office visit requested). It was not a great > way to start my weekend, getting a letter saying I owed them > about $13K in taxes, penalties and interest! But, as I> read on I realized all four items they were contesting were > relatively easy to explain and document. > They all derived from sales of my employer's stock via their > employee stock purchase plan or non-qualified options I > exercised. In the former case, the profit is reported on my > W-2 as ordinary income, and in the latter full fed/state > witholding is made and the amount of profit is reported on > my W-2. Unfortunately, the brokerage simple reports a 1099-B > of the gross proceeds, which is what the IRS is using to > base their claim (not having enough info to determine cost > basis). > Naively, I didn't supply any extra documentation with my > return supporting the cost basis, figuring it all got worked > out somehow since some withholding was made and the amounts > are on my W-2, plus I wanted to file electronically. My bad > as my teenage son would say! > So, with about 3 hours work I supplied about 15 pages of > supporting documentation along with an explanation of each > item and a summary spreadsheet and mailed that off in > response, certified return receipt (all within about 3 days > of receiving the notice). > What can I expect now? It *seems* straightforward to me and > my cover letter was cooperative and polite, and I'd expect a > reasonable person to quickly see that all was computed > correctly (well, there is about 50 bucks total difference on > $42K gross that I couldn't account for...) and close the > audit promptly. More naivete? > How long should I expect to receive a response one way or > another? What are the odds they will now check other years > for this apparent discrepancy? What are my options if they > insist on their point of view? Do I need to do anything with > respect to my state return (OR) now or do they wait for the > result of the audit? > Believe me, in the future I will pre-document these kinds of > items when I next file a return. Better than risking a > coronary! :^) (same day sale) on a schedule d, short term capital gain. And actually, when you look at broker's statement, you'll see he made his commission, that's for sure! And that commission would therefore result on a loss on schedule d. Not sure how IRS will react to your voluminous reply, but this is the simple solution. ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n lA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| CB <temp1[at]tomochka.com> wrote: - quote - > For the first time in my 30+ years as a taxpayer I received
Rule of thumb: If you get a 1099-B then you have to file a> an audit notice (for my 2003 return), more specifically a > letter audit (no office visit requested). It was not a great > way to start my weekend, getting a letter saying I owed them > about $13K in taxes, penalties and interest! But, as I> read on I realized all four items they were contesting were > relatively easy to explain and document. > They all derived from sales of my employer's stock via their > employee stock purchase plan or non-qualified options I > exercised. In the former case, the profit is reported on my > W-2 as ordinary income, and in the latter full fed/state > witholding is made and the amount of profit is reported on > my W-2. Unfortunately, the brokerage simple reports a 1099-B > of the gross proceeds, which is what the IRS is using to > base their claim (not having enough info to determine cost > basis). > Naively, I didn't supply any extra documentation with my > return supporting the cost basis, figuring it all got worked > out somehow since some withholding was made and the amounts > are on my W-2, plus I wanted to file electronically. My bad > as my teenage son would say! > So, with about 3 hours work I supplied about 15 pages of > supporting documentation along with an explanation of each > item and a summary spreadsheet and mailed that off in > response, certified return receipt (all within about 3 days > of receiving the notice). > What can I expect now? It *seems* straightforward to me and > my cover letter was cooperative and polite, and I'd expect a > reasonable person to quickly see that all was computed > correctly (well, there is about 50 bucks total difference on > $42K gross that I couldn't account for...) and close the > audit promptly. More naivete? > How long should I expect to receive a response one way or > another? What are the odds they will now check other years > for this apparent discrepancy? What are my options if they > insist on their point of view? Do I need to do anything with > respect to my state return (OR) now or do they wait for the > result of the audit? > Believe me, in the future I will pre-document these kinds of > items when I next file a return. Better than risking a > coronary! :^) Schedule D. So instead of writing long explanations, and coming up with spreadsheets, most of all of which might be kicked back to you, just file the schedule D as you should have, to begin with. The stock option part is easy -- your cost is market price on date of exercise, and sales price is shown in the 1099B. Chance are if you did a same day exercise and sale you have a slight loss due to brokers fee. The ESPP cost depends on whether you sold at a profit or loss and whether you had a disqualifying disposition. Look at your plan documents So file the schedule D, be sure you understand what goes on the schedule D or seek local professional tax advice. Your proposed solution is far, far too much work and will probably end up with a request for you to file the return correctly, namely with a schedule D. __ Art Kamlet ArtKamlet [at] AOL.com Columbus OH K2PZH << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| For the first time in my 30+ years as a taxpayer I received an audit notice (for my 2003 return), more specifically a letter audit (no office visit requested). It was not a great way to start my weekend, getting a letter saying I owed them about $13K in taxes, penalties and interest! But, as Iread on I realized all four items they were contesting were relatively easy to explain and document. They all derived from sales of my employer's stock via their employee stock purchase plan or non-qualified options I exercised. In the former case, the profit is reported on my W-2 as ordinary income, and in the latter full fed/state witholding is made and the amount of profit is reported on my W-2. Unfortunately, the brokerage simple reports a 1099-B of the gross proceeds, which is what the IRS is using to base their claim (not having enough info to determine cost basis). Naively, I didn't supply any extra documentation with my return supporting the cost basis, figuring it all got worked out somehow since some withholding was made and the amounts are on my W-2, plus I wanted to file electronically. My bad as my teenage son would say! So, with about 3 hours work I supplied about 15 pages of supporting documentation along with an explanation of each item and a summary spreadsheet and mailed that off in response, certified return receipt (all within about 3 days of receiving the notice). What can I expect now? It *seems* straightforward to me and my cover letter was cooperative and polite, and I'd expect a reasonable person to quickly see that all was computed correctly (well, there is about 50 bucks total difference on $42K gross that I couldn't account for...) and close the audit promptly. More naivete? How long should I expect to receive a response one way or another? What are the odds they will now check other years for this apparent discrepancy? What are my options if they insist on their point of view? Do I need to do anything with respect to my state return (OR) now or do they wait for the result of the audit? Believe me, in the future I will pre-document these kinds of items when I next file a return. Better than risking a coronary! :^) TIA, Casey << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| audit, expect, letter |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| What expenses one can expect in a small business. Cognition LLC: I've a small business recently started. So far we have no employees, mostly contractors. Now we would like to start employing directly. We have... | Taxes | 3 | 11-13-2004 02:45 AM | |
| When we can expect update for money 2005 Jungle: Now we knows that 2005 is buggy, so when we are getting update from Microsoft for 2005? Are they listening to us? I already read in Cnet, Pc mag... | Microsoft Money | 5 | 10-14-2004 03:06 PM | |
| NYS Tax Audit dilemmas SongBird: Hi, I have a lot of NYS tax problems. NYS sent me a claim that I did not pay my 2001 State taxes, but I did. I still have the W4 claims but I... | Taxes | 2 | 05-27-2004 04:25 AM | |
| tax audit Steve B.: The IRS believes I owe more taxes than stated on a previous personal tax return. I took out a loan of $17,800 from one of my retirement plans. I... | Taxes | 6 | 10-30-2003 03:40 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |