| | |||
| |||
| DORFMONT[at]aol.com wrote: - quote - > My client lives in Mexico in his own home. His wife lives in
Hi Linda,> California in a home owned by both of them. He has lived in > Mexico since 1997 and has established a legitimate residence > there (Mexican driver's license, votes at the consulate, > etc.). His wife is frightened that the FTB will take her > home (his house) was because they will say that he really > lives in California. We went through this battle trying to > get his erroneously withheld California taxes refunded. He > works in Europe. She flies between L.A. and N.Y.C. We > finally got all the money back but based on what I have seen > FTB do (go after another Mexican client who came from > Florida and this past year moved to Arizona, go after my > friend's daughter who has lived in Wisconsin for many years > with her family and owns a rental condo in the Valley which > she reports). His wife is worried. Given this situation is > there any chance he could be considered a California > resident. Well, as we always say in this business, it depends <G> . Is H a US citizen, or a citizen of Mexico? How much time does he spend in California? Are the spouses estranged, or just living apart while continuing to maintain the marital relationship? Who withheld CA tax on his income? Is he employed by a California company? If his employer is based in CA, they would probably have to cover him in CA for unemployment tax purposes, so that may explain why they withheld CA tax. You'd need to talk to the employer to help them understand that just because an expatriate employee is reported to the state for unemployment tax purposes, his earnings aren't California source income if he doesn't live or work in the state. Whatever the answers to my questions (and others that would no doubt arise if we really got into this <G> ), you can reassure the client that the FTB would not take her house. The worst they would do, if a final assessment was unpaid, would be to put a lien on it, which would have to be satisfied if the property was sold. But they wouldn't turn her out of her house. Katie in San Diego The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| My client lives in Mexico in his own home. His wife lives in California in a home owned by both of them. He has lived in Mexico since 1997 and has established a legitimate residence there (Mexican driver's license, votes at the consulate, etc.). His wife is frightened that the FTB will take her home (his house) was because they will say that he really lives in California. We went through this battle trying to get his erroneously withheld California taxes refunded. He works in Europe. She flies between L.A. and N.Y.C. We finally got all the money back but based on what I have seen FTB do (go after another Mexican client who came from Florida and this past year moved to Arizona, go after my friend's daughter who has lived in Wisconsin for many years with her family and owns a rental condo in the Valley which she reports). His wife is worried. Given this situation is there any chance he could be considered a California resident. Linda Dorfmont E.A., CFP, CSA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| mexican, resident |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Non-resident vs. Part-year Resident Victor Roberts: I am confused about the definition of "resident" for income tax purposes. I thought you could only be a resident of one state at a time, even... | Taxes | 5 | 03-13-2005 11:34 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |