|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Thanks, Harlan, that's what I thought. I will push them to rectify it. Thanks everyone, again, this has been very helpful. Lori << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > And I'm not saying it would cost me $500, but
that's not the point, Seth. a city occupational or income> > what I mean is that it would cost me more money on top of > > the additional money I am already losing from this problem, > > so by the time I pay someone to answer a quick question I'm > > going to be losing more money than I have already lost on > > this (not the $500, I did not lose the $500, I overpaid > > $500, which I got back but then it was taxed again). > > > My question is simply if this was done the right way -- > > essentially it seems to me money being sent through payroll > > two times is being doubly taxed. Am I wrong about this? > > Thanks again > I don't see any way you're actually _losing_ money, other > than the interest on the overwithheld amounts (if any) for > the rest of the year. > You overpaid $500 in taxes in 2004; that's a deduction for > 2004. It was refunded (to your company, instead of you) in > 2005; that's taxable income for 2005. Some amount was > withheld; that counts as tax paid, and the amount withheld > for city & state count as deductible, for 2005. tax is withheld after taxes, so any refund of same should not be taxable, neither subject to income taxes OR more FICA. Employer goofed up. ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Hi, thanks for all the replies. I did already speak to the people at my office before coming here, and they were not helpful. I know what was done, and this is what was done: the check for the amount overpaid went through payroll by itself as a separate check. All the deductions were taken which had already been taken from this amount in 2004 -- federal, social security, state, disability, etc. I don't see how the money I overpaid would be a deduction in 2004. I'm not sure what that means. This money was included in my salary on my W2 for 2004, but the taxes were not included in the local tax box of the W2. In other words, when they "corrected" the original error, the only thing they changed on my W2 was they reduced the taxes paid by the $500 (approximate for simplicity) amount. No other numbers changed. So that $500 was included in my salary amount I reported for taxes for 2004. I have talked to the people in the payroll department and they say they have done nothing wrong. I feel I am losing money -- because that $500 is now being included in my salary per the W-2 both for 2004 and 2005 and I paid not only federal and state taxes but social security -- TWICE. If Harlan is right, what do I do about it? I already told my company and they said basically too bad, they did nothing wrong. And if Harlan's wrong, what am I missing? Thanks so much! Lori << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| truelori wrote: - quote - > Hi, thanks for the response. What I'm trying to say is that
Simply put, you are right on target, Lori. Your company> firstly, I'm not sure an accountant can even actually > straighten this out -- isn't it my employer that's making > the mistake? So why should I have to pay an accountant > anything? And I'm not saying it would cost me $500, but > what I mean is that it would cost me more money on top of > the additional money I am already losing from this problem, > so by the time I pay someone to answer a quick question I'm > going to be losing more money than I have already lost on > this (not the $500, I did not lose the $500, I overpaid > $500, which I got back but then it was taxed again). > My question is simply if this was done the right way -- > essentially it seems to me money being sent through payroll > two times is being doubly taxed. Am I wrong about this? > Thanks again screwed up, and should have refunded you 100% of the overwithheld tax with no withholding consequences. ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > And I'm not saying it would cost me $500, but
I don't see any way you're actually _losing_ money, other> what I mean is that it would cost me more money on top of > the additional money I am already losing from this problem, > so by the time I pay someone to answer a quick question I'm > going to be losing more money than I have already lost on > this (not the $500, I did not lose the $500, I overpaid > $500, which I got back but then it was taxed again). > My question is simply if this was done the right way -- > essentially it seems to me money being sent through payroll > two times is being doubly taxed. Am I wrong about this? > Thanks again than the interest on the overwithheld amounts (if any) for the rest of the year. You overpaid $500 in taxes in 2004; that's a deduction for 2004. It was refunded (to your company, instead of you) in 2005; that's taxable income for 2005. Some amount was withheld; that counts as tax paid, and the amount withheld for city & state count as deductible, for 2005. Seth << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Hi, thanks for the response. What I'm trying to say is that firstly, I'm not sure an accountant can even actually straighten this out -- isn't it my employer that's making the mistake? So why should I have to pay an accountant anything? And I'm not saying it would cost me $500, but what I mean is that it would cost me more money on top of the additional money I am already losing from this problem, so by the time I pay someone to answer a quick question I'm going to be losing more money than I have already lost on this (not the $500, I did not lose the $500, I overpaid $500, which I got back but then it was taxed again). My question is simply if this was done the right way -- essentially it seems to me money being sent through payroll two times is being doubly taxed. Am I wrong about this? Thanks again Lori << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| truelori wrote: - quote - > Hi, my employer made a mistake last year on my taxes and
I really can't tell from your post what happened. The> took out too much local tax. I don't know why, but instead > of me just getting a tax refund when I filed my taxes, the > local (NYC)department of finance refunded the money to my > employer. Now the employer has written me a check for the > amount overpaid (over $500) and it went through payroll, so > taxes were taken out. > Am I being taxed double? It seems to me I am, since this > amount was not taken OFF my wages from last year. Therefore > it will be in my wages for 2004 AND for 2005. I don't know > what to do. If I pay a tax accountant to answer this for me > I'm going to end up losing even MORE money on this stupid > mistake my employer made. problem is in "went through payroll, so taxes were taken out". This reads like an assumption on your part, that if something goes through payroll then it is taxed. That is not the case; not everything that "goes though payroll" (i.e., appears on your paycheck stub) was taxed. It should be easy for you to check the local NYC tax (3.65% ?) for this particular pay stub - what amount was taxed, the correct amount or that amount plus the "over 500"? (and this is the more important one to check as it really is a tax, while state and federal deductions are witholding which is a little different). There is another simple step to take - ask the people who do your payroll for their explaination of what was done. Then if you still have questions, ask here again. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| "truelori" <lori[at]truelori.com> wrote: - quote - > Hi, my employer made a mistake last year on my taxes and
If you find the right accountant, it should not cost you> took out too much local tax. I don't know why, but instead > of me just getting a tax refund when I filed my taxes, the > local (NYC)department of finance refunded the money to my > employer. Now the employer has written me a check for the > amount overpaid (over $500) and it went through payroll, so > taxes were taken out. > Am I being taxed double? It seems to me I am, since this > amount was not taken OFF my wages from last year. Therefore > it will be in my wages for 2004 AND for 2005. I don't know > what to do. If I pay a tax accountant to answer this for me > I'm going to end up losing even MORE money on this stupid > mistake my employer made. $500 to get this straightened out. Wayne Brasch, CPA, M. S. Taxation << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Hi, my employer made a mistake last year on my taxes and took out too much local tax. I don't know why, but instead of me just getting a tax refund when I filed my taxes, the local (NYC)department of finance refunded the money to my employer. Now the employer has written me a check for the amount overpaid (over $500) and it went through payroll, so taxes were taken out. Am I being taxed double? It seems to me I am, since this amount was not taken OFF my wages from last year. Therefore it will be in my wages for 2004 AND for 2005. I don't know what to do. If I pay a tax accountant to answer this for me I'm going to end up losing even MORE money on this stupid mistake my employer made. Any advice? Thanks Lori << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| double, tax |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Double Counting Kyle: If you set MS Money up for your credit cards and your bank accounts, if you make a payment from a bank account to your credit card, MS Money will... | Microsoft Money | 3 | 03-12-2005 11:26 AM | |
| Double Taxation US-UK Juan: I am looking for some info regarding my complicated tax situation... Any help is appreciated. I am a US citizen, for most part of the year I have... | Taxes | 1 | 07-21-2004 06:17 AM | |
| double entries frustrated: Prior to this week, if I downloaded my bank information into Money 2003, only new items were entered. Now it enters everything again so I have... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 04-12-2004 08:55 PM | |
| downloads and double double entries Steve in Vancouver: I have a problem -- and I am the first to admit it may be with my concept or use of Money 2003. I am no accountant. Please bear with me when I... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 12-16-2003 03:22 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |