|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Lance Mannion <a[at]a.net> wrote: - quote - > "Katie" <katiej_1958[at]yahoo.com> wrote:
A little less than that: you paid the 15.3% on the $15K you> > Worst case scenario: the whole $90,000 is recharacterized > > as salary, and you owe self-employment tax on it, which is > > about 15%, plus interest from the original due date of your > > individual income tax return to the date of payment. And > > you might have an accuracy-related penalty. > FYI - it was *all* from my services, and was all paid in > that year. So it sounds like my risk exposure is (worst > case): > 90k * 15.3% plus interest, plus accuracy penalties ? took as salary, so it's $75K * 15.3% plus. (And around 3% on the other $15K.) - quote - > No failure to file or failure to pay penalties ?
You _did_ file and pay, you just did them wrong.Seth << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| "Lance Mannion" wrote: - quote - > ...
The only penalty on this issue should be the deposit> 90k * 15.3% plus interest, plus accuracy penalties ? > No failure to file or failure to pay penalties ? penalty, if you'll agree with IRS to the tax. Even if 941 returns were not otherwise required to be filed and were not thus filed, the failure to file penalties are arguable as to reasonable cause, and the accuracy penalty will be further stretching things on an issue like this, IMO. Nothing stopping IRS from proposing, of course. Fred F. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| "Harlan Lunsford" wrote: - quote - > ...
Some states have like even $7+ minimum wage. I read of one> Minimum wage at 40 hours per week, 50 weeks a year (I'll > allow two weeks vacation!), comes out to only 10,300$. Or > do McDonald workers get overtime? place where the voice behind the drive-thru ordering station is "outsourced." The employee is physically located across the nearby state border where only fed minimum wage applies. :-o - quote - > Any S corporation, like any other "regular" corporation, can
The cases that IRS has won on this issue (virtually 100%) so> reward it's 100% shareholders, owners, founders, with an > ROI (return on investment) based on longevity and goodwill. far don't get into any of that. It's theoretically a % return on the value of the equity, which you can't prove w/o an appraisal. So, use then a % of net book value, which is typically how much in a small service corp? Esp if we've 179'd our equipment and stuff? Reg, Fred F. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| "Katie" <katiej_1958[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > Worst case scenario: the whole $90,000 is recharacterized
Thank You Katie.> as salary, and you owe self-employment tax on it, which is > about 15%, plus interest from the original due date of your > individual income tax return to the date of payment. And > you might have an accuracy-related penalty. FYI - it was *all* from my services, and was all paid in that year. So it sounds like my risk exposure is (worst case): 90k * 15.3% plus interest, plus accuracy penalties ? No failure to file or failure to pay penalties ? << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Harlan Lunsford wrote: - quote - > TaxSrv wrote:
The starting fast food wage is more than $6 per hour around> > > > I noticed on a past return that I only paid 15k as a W2 > > > > wage... > > > ...if the corporation earns a substantial part of its income from > > > something other than your services, e.g., assets it owns or > > > the services of employees, your salary might not be all that > > > unreasonable. > > I agree an S Corp can earn profits for its investors if it > > has significant non-shareholder labor or productive assets, > > provided the S/Hs are properly compensated, but $15,000 for > > full-time work of any kind is way low. That's just above > > starting wage at a fast-food place. > Surely you jest, Fred. > Mininum wage at 40 hours per week, 50 weeks a year (I'll > allow two weeks vacation!), comes out to only 10,300$. Or > do McDonald workers get overtime? > Any S corporation, like any other "regular" corporation, can > reward it's 100% shareholders, owners, founders, with an > ROI (return on investment) based on longevity and goodwill. here. The tack of lack of funds in a growing business is more likely to pass muster. A minuscule active shareholder salary in conjunction with large distributions of income as dividend begins to smell. -- Frederick E. Jorden http://Tax-Accounting-Payroll.com 7825 Midlothian Tpk - 207 Richmond, VA 23235-5247 EMAIL knowtax[at]bigfoot.com (804) 320-6210 FAX (804) 320-6211 << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| TaxSrv wrote: - quote - > > > I noticed on a past return that I only paid 15k as a W2
Surely you jest, Fred.> > > wage... > > ...if the corporation earns a substantial part of its income from > > something other than your services, e.g., assets it owns or > > the services of employees, your salary might not be all that > > unreasonable. > I agree an S Corp can earn profits for its investors if it > has significant non-shareholder labor or productive assets, > provided the S/Hs are properly compensated, but $15,000 for > full-time work of any kind is way low. That's just above > starting wage at a fast-food place. Mininum wage at 40 hours per week, 50 weeks a year (I'll allow two weeks vacation!), comes out to only 10,300$. Or do McDonald workers get overtime? Any S corporation, like any other "regular" corporation, can reward it's 100% shareholders, owners, founders, with an ROI (return on investment) based on longevity and goodwill. ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| - quote - > > I noticed on a past return that I only paid 15k as a W2
I agree an S Corp can earn profits for its investors if it> > wage... > ...if the corporation earns a substantial part of its income from > something other than your services, e.g., assets it owns or > the services of employees, your salary might not be all that > unreasonable. has significant non-shareholder labor or productive assets, provided the S/Hs are properly compensated, but $15,000 for full-time work of any kind is way low. That's just above starting wage at a fast-food place. Fred F. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Lance Mannion wrote: - quote - > I noticed on a past return that I only paid 15k as a W2
Well, it depends on a lot of things. If you added some> wage, and 90k on Schedule E for my S corp. I know this > does not meet the "reasonableness" test. > Are my odds of audit greatly increased? > Would they just reclassify it all as wage? > What would be the penalties? zeroes to your numbers (e.g., $15,000 salary and $900,000 passthru), the IRS would be more interested. Also, if the corporation earns a substantial part of its income from something other than your services, e.g., assets it owns or the services of employees, your salary might not be all that unreasonable. Worst case scenario: the whole $90,000 is recharacterized as salary, and you owe self-employment tax on it, which is about 15%, plus interest from the original due date of your individual income tax return to the date of payment. And you might have an accuracy-related penalty. Katie in San Diego The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| corp, paid, problematic, profit, small, wages |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Re: Small % of S corp profit paid as wages - problematic? Lance Mannion: I noticed on a past return that I only paid 15k as a W2 wage, and 90k on Schedule E for my S corp. I know this does not meet the "reasonableness"... | Taxes | 6 | 05-06-2005 05:37 PM | |
| Re: Small % of S corp profit paid as wages - problematic? Bill Brown: Lance Mannion wrote: > I noticed on a past return that I only paid 15k as a W2 > wage, and 90k on Schedule E for my S corp. I know this > does... | Taxes | 1 | 05-02-2005 05:15 AM | |
| S-corp wages MTW: Can anyone cite something AUTHORITATIVE within the meaning of Circular 230, Section 10.34(d)(1) to support the theory that an S-corp shareholder... | Taxes | 28 | 11-01-2004 06:36 PM | |
| Wages at a non-profit Michelle Kapp: If you work for a non-profit organization, do they withhold for SS and Medicare taxes? << -------------------------------------------------><<... | Taxes | 8 | 01-16-2004 07:37 AM | |
| Wages paid to your minor child. (Exemption of Soc. Sec. taxes ) BigAl: I've read in several newsletters over the years that wages paid to your minor children that are living with you are exempt from social security... | Taxes | 3 | 11-14-2003 03:01 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |