|
#13
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > While I understand what you're saying and the reasons
My parents died in 1994. I had in my possession copies of> > therefor, can you imagine how many people actually save > > their tax returns? And how many children have copies of > > parents' tax returns after their demise? > Actually, I still have some of my father's returns: > 1956-1963 and 1980-1990, plus his 706. He died in 1990. I > may have others that I simply haven't found yet as there's a > large amount of papers I have yet to go through even 15 > years later. their last 20 or so tax returns until last month, when I finally decided I no longer needed them and shredded them. I am now waiting for the inevitable notice from someone that can only be resolved with copies of the returns I just shredded. -- D.F. Manno dfm2a3l0t2[at]spymac.com "The work goes on, the cause endures, the hope still lives and the dream will never die." << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > > > > "One last question. The bonds that were cashed in were in my
Actually, I still have some of my father's returns:> > > > > mother's name, POD my name. The bonds were purchased in > > > > > 1964. My mother passed away in 1974. I assumed that I owed > > > > > the entire interest. Are you saying that even in this case I > > > > > only owed the interest from 1974 to 2004 (which would be the > > > > > bulk of the interest anyway)?" > > > > Look at IRS Publication 559 for income from inherited saving > > > > bonds. If the executor reported the interest on the date of > > > > death on the final tax return, you only owe from the date of > > > > death. If you can't prove that, you owe the entire amount of > > > > interest. > > > Thanks. That was my impression and that's how I proceeded. > > > > > The bonds were just discovered recently, so obviously it was > > > not reported as part of the estate. > > That does NOT mean that your mother didn't report the > > interest as it accrued when she was alive. You need to go > > back to her income tax returns and find out. > While I understand what you're saying and the reasons > therefor, can you imagine how many people actually save > their tax returns? And how many children have copies of > parents' tax returns after their demise? 1956-1963 and 1980-1990, plus his 706. He died in 1990. I may have others that I simply haven't found yet as there's a large amount of papers I have yet to go through even 15 years later. As I didn't join the IRS until the mid-1980's, having a "revenuer" as a son wasn't a factor. Is that enough real-world for you? Moderator: Will the next person trim this big time. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| Harlan Lunsford <lunstax[at]belllsouth.net> wrote: - quote - > > That does NOT mean that your mother didn't report the
True - but they _should_ only have to find the most recent> > interest as it accrued when she was alive. You need to go > > back to her income tax returns and find out. > While I understand what you're saying and the reasons > therefor, can you imagine how many people actually save > their tax returns? And how many children have copies of > parents' tax returns after their demise? > (Welcome to the real world, D!) grin return. As you know, once you start to accrue interest on savings bonds you cannot stop (for those bonds). So, if the most recent tax return has an accrual entry for a particular set of bonds, you should be able to assume that interest on those bonds was accrued for previous years also, and no other currently-owned savings bonds had interest accrued. -- Vic Roberts Replace xxx with vdr in e-mail address. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > > > "One last question. The bonds that were cashed in were in my
While I understand what you're saying and the reasons> > > > mother's name, POD my name. The bonds were purchased in > > > > 1964. My mother passed away in 1974. I assumed that I owed > > > > the entire interest. Are you saying that even in this case I > > > > only owed the interest from 1974 to 2004 (which would be the > > > > bulk of the interest anyway)?" > > > Look at IRS Publication 559 for income from inherited saving > > > bonds. If the executor reported the interest on the date of > > > death on the final tax return, you only owe from the date of > > > death. If you can't prove that, you owe the entire amount of > > > interest. > > Thanks. That was my impression and that's how I proceeded. > > > The bonds were just discovered recently, so obviously it was > > not reported as part of the estate. > That does NOT mean that your mother didn't report the > interest as it accrued when she was alive. You need to go > back to her income tax returns and find out. therefor, can you imagine how many people actually save their tax returns? And how many children have copies of parents' tax returns after their demise? (Welcome to the real world, D!) grin ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| D. Stussy wrote: - quote - > MB_ wrote:
Even if (a) mother had been electing to report interest only> > Mr. Stussy: > > Thanks for responding. You said: > > > Administratively, I wouldn't bother unless reporting the > > > interest in 2004 provides a tax savings over 2005 reporting. > > > However, you are technically correct that it should be 2004 > > > income. I don't understand your comments regarding being > > > penalized for late filing on an AMENDED return. > > Since it is after April 15, I thought there would be > > additional interest, penalties, etc. if I file the ammended > > return. Is that not the case?? > Penalties go against the ORIGINAL return. An amended return > can only be an amendment if an original was filed. Interest > is not a penalty. > > I would certainly rather file it in 2005 (for a variety of > > reasons). Do you know if the 1099-INT form will say 2005 > > since I got the funds in 2005. Incidentally, in order to get > > the funds, I had to send in form 1048.pdf. I assumed the > > 1099-INT would be attached to the check, but it wasn't. Does > > the gov't send me a separate 1099-INT for those bonds?? > > > One last question. The bonds that were cashed in were in my > > mother's name, POD my name. The bonds were purchased in > > 1964. My mother passed away in 1974. I assumed that I owed > > the entire interest. Are you saying that even in this case I > > only owed the interest from 1974 to 2004 (which would be the > > bulk of the interest anyway)? > The interest 1964-1974 should have been reported in some way > (income and/or estate tax) previously. when she would cash said bonds? and (b) if no estate return were even required to have been filed? ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| MB_ wrote: - quote - > Mr. Stussy:
Penalties go against the ORIGINAL return. An amended return> Thanks for responding. You said: > > Administratively, I wouldn't bother unless reporting the > > interest in 2004 provides a tax savings over 2005 reporting. > > However, you are technically correct that it should be 2004 > > income. I don't understand your comments regarding being > > penalized for late filing on an AMENDED return. > Since it is after April 15, I thought there would be > additional interest, penalties, etc. if I file the ammended > return. Is that not the case?? can only be an amendment if an original was filed. Interest is not a penalty. - quote - > I would certainly rather file it in 2005 (for a variety of
The interest 1964-1974 should have been reported in some way> reasons). Do you know if the 1099-INT form will say 2005 > since I got the funds in 2005. Incidentally, in order to get > the funds, I had to send in form 1048.pdf. I assumed the > 1099-INT would be attached to the check, but it wasn't. Does > the gov't send me a separate 1099-INT for those bonds?? > One last question. The bonds that were cashed in were in my > mother's name, POD my name. The bonds were purchased in > 1964. My mother passed away in 1974. I assumed that I owed > the entire interest. Are you saying that even in this case I > only owed the interest from 1974 to 2004 (which would be the > bulk of the interest anyway)? (income and/or estate tax) previously. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > > "One last question. The bonds that were cashed in were in my
That does NOT mean that your mother didn't report the> > > mother's name, POD my name. The bonds were purchased in > > > 1964. My mother passed away in 1974. I assumed that I owed > > > the entire interest. Are you saying that even in this case I > > > only owed the interest from 1974 to 2004 (which would be the > > > bulk of the interest anyway)?" > > Look at IRS Publication 559 for income from inherited saving > > bonds. If the executor reported the interest on the date of > > death on the final tax return, you only owe from the date of > > death. If you can't prove that, you owe the entire amount of > > interest. > Thanks. That was my impression and that's how I proceeded. > The bonds were just discovered recently, so obviously it was > not reported as part of the estate. interest as it accrued when she was alive. You need to go back to her income tax returns and find out. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > > "One last question. The bonds that were cashed in were in my
I believe there was some kind of return filed (I think a> > > mother's name, POD my name. The bonds were purchased in > > > 1964. My mother passed away in 1974. I assumed that I owed > > > the entire interest. Are you saying that even in this case I > > > only owed the interest from 1974 to 2004 (which would be the > > > bulk of the interest anyway)?" > > Look at IRS Publication 559 for income from inherited saving > > bonds. If the executor reported the interest on the date of > > death on the final tax return, you only owe from the date of > > death. If you can't prove that, you owe the entire amount of > > interest. > Interesting. If the estate were not large enough to require > an estate return, there would be no reporting on paper. > However, the value as OF the applicable date would still be > fixed and therefore usuable as basis I should think. > So, the minute I hear somebody (related to a client) died, > and I'm asked by client, I say to immediately do the > valuations, even if entire estate is less than 1.5 million$. final tax return). This was in 1974 (when my mother passed away). << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > > "One last question. The bonds that were cashed in were in my
I believe there was some kind of return filed (I think a> > > mother's name, POD my name. The bonds were purchased in > > > 1964. My mother passed away in 1974. I assumed that I owed > > > the entire interest. Are you saying that even in this case I > > > only owed the interest from 1974 to 2004 (which would be the > > > bulk of the interest anyway)?" > > Look at IRS Publication 559 for income from inherited saving > > bonds. If the executor reported the interest on the date of > > death on the final tax return, you only owe from the date of > > death. If you can't prove that, you owe the entire amount of > > interest. > Interesting. If the estate were not large enough to require > an estate return, there would be no reporting on paper. > However, the value as OF the applicable date would still be > fixed and therefore usuable as basis I should think. > So, the minute I hear somebody (related to a client) died, > and I'm asked by client, I say to immediately do the > valuations, even if entire estate is less than 1.5 million$. final tax return). This was in 1974 (when my mother passed away). << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > "One last question. The bonds that were cashed in were in my
Interesting. If the estate were not large enough to require> > mother's name, POD my name. The bonds were purchased in > > 1964. My mother passed away in 1974. I assumed that I owed > > the entire interest. Are you saying that even in this case I > > only owed the interest from 1974 to 2004 (which would be the > > bulk of the interest anyway)?" > Look at IRS Publication 559 for income from inherited saving > bonds. If the executor reported the interest on the date of > death on the final tax return, you only owe from the date of > death. If you can't prove that, you owe the entire amount of > interest. an estate return, there would be no reporting on paper. However, the value as OF the applicable date would still be fixed and therefore usuable as basis I should think. So, the minute I hear somebody (related to a client) died, and I'm asked by client, I say to immediately do the valuations, even if entire estate is less than 1.5 million$. ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > "One last question. The bonds that were cashed in were in my
Thanks. That was my impression and that's how I proceeded.> > mother's name, POD my name. The bonds were purchased in > > 1964. My mother passed away in 1974. I assumed that I owed > > the entire interest. Are you saying that even in this case I > > only owed the interest from 1974 to 2004 (which would be the > > bulk of the interest anyway)?" > Look at IRS Publication 559 for income from inherited saving > bonds. If the executor reported the interest on the date of > death on the final tax return, you only owe from the date of > death. If you can't prove that, you owe the entire amount of > interest. The bonds were just discovered recently, so obviously it was not reported as part of the estate. Mel << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > "One last question. The bonds that were cashed in were in my
Look at IRS Publication 559 for income from inherited saving> mother's name, POD my name. The bonds were purchased in > 1964. My mother passed away in 1974. I assumed that I owed > the entire interest. Are you saying that even in this case I > only owed the interest from 1974 to 2004 (which would be the > bulk of the interest anyway)?" bonds. If the executor reported the interest on the date of death on the final tax return, you only owe from the date of death. If you can't prove that, you owe the entire amount of interest. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Mr. Stussy: Thanks for responding. You said: - quote - > Administratively, I wouldn't bother unless reporting the
Since it is after April 15, I thought there would be> interest in 2004 provides a tax savings over 2005 reporting. > However, you are technically correct that it should be 2004 > income. I don't understand your comments regarding being > penalized for late filing on an AMENDED return. additional interest, penalties, etc. if I file the ammended return. Is that not the case?? I would certainly rather file it in 2005 (for a variety of reasons). Do you know if the 1099-INT form will say 2005 since I got the funds in 2005. Incidentally, in order to get the funds, I had to send in form 1048.pdf. I assumed the 1099-INT would be attached to the check, but it wasn't. Does the gov't send me a separate 1099-INT for those bonds?? One last question. The bonds that were cashed in were in my mother's name, POD my name. The bonds were purchased in 1964. My mother passed away in 1974. I assumed that I owed the entire interest. Are you saying that even in this case I only owed the interest from 1974 to 2004 (which would be the bulk of the interest anyway)? Thanks for your help. Mel << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| MB_ wrote: - quote - > I have just found out there are some "E" bonds in my name
Since you didn't know about them, simply report the interest> (unbeknownst to me previously; they apparently were > purchased by my mother who passed away over 30 years ago). > Anyway, these bonds were purchased so many years ago that > they are beyond final maturity. I am not sure how to handle > this tax-wise as the law is clear on this: the latest year > to claim income on this is the year in which they reach > final maturity. now as you will be cashing them in (perhaps to reinvest the proceeds in another investment). There's no reason not to since they won't accrue any more interest. - quote - > Now, some reached final maturity in 2004. So, I assume I
Administratively, I wouldn't bother unless reporting the> file an ammended return but then I'll have to take a hit due > to late filing and underwithholding. Is there any way to > avoid or minimize that at this point?? interest in 2004 provides a tax savings over 2005 reporting. However, you are technically correct that it should be 2004 income. I don't understand your comments regarding being penalized for late filing on an AMENDED return. - quote - > Other bonds reached final maturity as long as 20 years ago,
If she had an estate tax, then you may have an estate tax> but they are in my mother's name. I am her only son. So, > what are the tax implications for this (those were small > bonds and the total interest will be about $400 for both of > them combined). deduction for this "income with respect to a decedent." Regardless, you are only responsible for the income in the past 20 years (assuming you are saying that's when she died). << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I have just found out there are some "E" bonds in my name (unbeknownst to me previously; they apparently were purchased by my mother who passed away over 30 years ago). Anyway, these bonds were purchased so many years ago that they are beyond final maturity. I am not sure how to handle this tax-wise as the law is clear on this: the latest year to claim income on this is the year in which they reach final maturity. Now, some reached final maturity in 2004. So, I assume I file an ammended return but then I'll have to take a hit due to late filing and underwithholding. Is there any way to avoid or minimize that at this point?? Other bonds reached final maturity as long as 20 years ago, but they are in my mother's name. I am her only son. So, what are the tax implications for this (those were small bonds and the total interest will be about $400 for both of them combined). Mel << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| bonds, discovered, final, maturity, newly, past |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| "news" and "fyi" links on the "Track My Portfolio" page tom: no longer work in my Money 2000. When I click them, I get "MSN Money-Page Not Found" and "The page you requested could not be found." But there is a... | Microsoft Money | 7 | 10-25-2007 11:34 PM | |
| Stuck at "Update in Progress" for the Past 2 Days labear: For the past 2 days, I have not been able to do account updates. Everytime I try to do online updaye, it says "you cannot perform this operation... | Microsoft Money | 3 | 09-26-2007 03:48 PM | |
| Problem with keeping track of shared expenses, "His", "Hers", "Ours" and How much do I owe you? P.Constantineau: Hi all, My girlfriend and I are having trouble figuring how to use money 2005 to indicate us how much we owe each other. I have setup Money 2005... | Microsoft Money | 4 | 04-03-2006 02:01 PM | |
| Money 2002 transaction status flags ("E", "C", "R") have all disappeared Nick Tonkin: Hi, After many months of using Money 2002, yesterday I suddenly noticed that the column in my resgister that shows the cleared status of each... | Microsoft Money | 4 | 02-28-2004 04:39 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |