|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Phil Marti <prm20871[at]verizon.net> wrote: - quote - > "Seth Breidbart" <sethb[at]panix.com> wrote:
Microsoft stock is currently selling for $24.75. Options to> > One of us doesn't understand the concept of options. > More likely that we drew different conclusions from the OP. > Although too speculative for my taste, I'm sure there are > investors who would, under what they saw as ideal > circumstances, buy an option to buy at $23 when the stock > was trading at $20. I'm not totally sure, though, that I > wouldn't like to talk to them about my bridge. buy a share for $27 are selling for $1.70-$1.75. (They expire in Jan. 2007.) The open interest is almost 50,000 contracts (for 100 shares each). So there are lots of people who are willing to buy such options. Seth << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| "Seth Breidbart" <sethb[at]panix.com> wrote: - quote - > One of us doesn't understand the concept of options.
More likely that we drew different conclusions from the OP.Although too speculative for my taste, I'm sure there are investors who would, under what they saw as ideal circumstances, buy an option to buy at $23 when the stock was trading at $20. I'm not totally sure, though, that I wouldn't like to talk to them about my bridge. -- Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| sethb[at]panix.com (Seth Breidbart) writes: - quote - > Phil Marti <prm20871[at]verizon.net> wrote:
Seth is of course correct. However, I interpreted the> > Who's the idiot who's going to pay for an option to buy a > > stock at $23 (not $20) that he can get for $20 without the > > option? > Me, provided the price is low enough, the expiry far enough > away, and the stock volatile enough. > One of us doesn't understand the concept of options. original poster as talking about *exercising* options with a strike of $23 when the stock was at $20, and then selling the stock, in order to generate a capital loss. I'm sure we can all agree that is an idiotic thing to do. The OP's language is ambiguous, I admit, and I reproduce it below: - quote - > Here's the scenario:
Since these are clearly employee stock options (as opposed> - let's say you work for Acme, Inc and were granted > 1000 stock options, with a strike price of $23 > - let's say the current NYSE stock market price of Acme is $20 > She's claiming that you can sell your $20 options, and > take a "realized lost" of 3*1000 = -$3,000 to market-traded options), I'm willing to bet "sell your $20 options" really means "exercise the options at $23 and sell the stock at $20" because I've run across so many people who talking about employee stock options say "selling my options" when they really mean a same-day exercise and sale. -- Rich Carreiro rlcarr[at]animato.arlington.ma.us << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Ted Johnson <ted_johnson[at]hp.com> wrote: - quote - > A colleague is claiming that underwater stock options can
No. If you exercise them and sell the stock, you have a> actually be used to lower capital gains taxes. > Here's the scenario: > - let's say you work for Acme, Inc and were granted > 1000 stock options, with a strike price of $23 > - let's say the current NYSE stock market price of Acme is $20 > She's claiming that you can sell your $20 options, and > take a "realized lost" of 3*1000 = -$3,000 > Is this true? realized loss. But that's a foolish idea. Seth << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Phil Marti <prm20871[at]verizon.net> wrote: - quote - > Who's the idiot who's going to pay for an option to buy a
Me, provided the price is low enough, the expiry far enough> stock at $23 (not $20) that he can get for $20 without the > option? away, and the stock volatile enough. One of us doesn't understand the concept of options. Seth << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "Ted Johnson" <ted[at]estaff05.mayfield.hp.com> wrote: - quote - > A colleague is claiming that underwater stock options can
Who's the idiot who's going to pay for an option to buy a> actually be used to lower capital gains taxes. > Here's the scenario: > - let's say you work for Acme, Inc and were granted > 1000 stock options, with a strike price of $23 > - let's say the current NYSE stock market price of Acme is $20 > She's claiming that you can sell your $20 options, and > take a "realized lost" of 3*1000 = -$3,000 > Is this true? stock at $23 (not $20) that he can get for $20 without the option? Have him call me about this bridge I have for sale through a quit claim deed. -- Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| ted[at]estaff05.mayfield.hp.com (Ted Johnson) writes: - quote - > Here's the scenario:
It's probably true. But who knows, because I don't see why> - let's say you work for Acme, Inc and were granted > 1000 stock options, with a strike price of $23 > - let's say the current NYSE stock market price of Acme is $20 > She's claiming that you can sell your $20 options, and > take a "realized lost" of 3*1000 = -$3,000 > Is this true? any rational person would ever want to do it. You lose $3000 to save around $750. That means you still *lost* (i.e. decreased your actual net worth by) $2,250. -- Rich Carreiro rlcarr[at]animato.arlington.ma.us << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| A colleague is claiming that underwater stock options can actually be used to lower capital gains taxes. Here's the scenario: - let's say you work for Acme, Inc and were granted 1000 stock options, with a strike price of $23 - let's say the current NYSE stock market price of Acme is $20 She's claiming that you can sell your $20 options, and take a "realized lost" of 3*1000 = -$3,000 Is this true? Thanks in advance. -Ted << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| cap, gains, lower, options, stock, underwater |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Stock Options neil154: I purchased some call options which expired in September and they expired without being exercised. I then purchased some call options which... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 10-23-2008 09:54 PM | |
| Change Stock Symbol in Stock Options Account Tom: I have a stock options account with my company. However, about mid-yar theyy changed their name and therefore their stock ticker symbol. I need to... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 11-21-2004 04:51 PM | |
| Will Long-term stock loss lower AMT income? Lovefreak: Does anyone know if a long-term capital loss (from stock) is accepted as a deduction when calculating your income for AMT purposes? I think I'm... | Taxes | 2 | 12-29-2003 12:56 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |