|
#7
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > Moderator:
You're very charitable, but this one's a whack job. I> I did not identify the poster because I considered this > to be a misunderstanding. Please do not harrass him or > her. This is a professional forum and people often > misunderstand. finally had to put him on my block list. -- Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Dick Adams <rdadams[at]smart.net> wrote: - quote - > An unnamed individual sent me the following criticisms:
You did post his message - I just read it!> > I would love to see the end of misc.taxes.moderated in favor > > of this group. Usenet groups focusing on technical issues > > like taxes seem to do pretty well without some self-appointed > > deity deciding which posts get in and which don't. > Correction: There was an election. However, I was the only > candidate. > > For the second time my post to that group did not make it > > - a simple about how to calculate square footage for the > > purposes of taking a home office deduction. I didn't > > cross-post, use curse words, reveal my age, ethnicity, > > heights, weight, hair color or anything else that my > > subject me to the Orwellian vagaries of the > > misc.taxes.moderated chopping tool. I finally gave up > > and went to the IRS. > I don't recall the submission. However, I haven't deleted > anything other than advertising in quite awhile. So your > submission either got posted or it didn't get to me. You have been more than helpful when I had problems posting to this moderated group due to technical problems on my end, none of which were your fault. Let him go elsewhere. -- Vic Roberts Replace xxx with vdr in e-mail address. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Dick Adams <rdadams[at]smart.net> wrote: - quote - > An unnamed individual sent me the following criticisms:
What is "this group" that he's referring to?> > I would love to see the end of misc.taxes.moderated in favor > > of this group. -- Barry Margolin, barmar[at]alum.mit.edu Arlington, MA ================================================== ========== Moderator: I think he meant misc.taxes.moderated without me. But I did not take it personally since he was much kinder toward me than I am toward the imbecile in charge of Major League Baseball to whom I refer to as Commissioner Kevorkian and I hope the gutless wonder also know as Bud Light takes it personally. My anagram for Bud Selig is I. B. Sludge. Now that is off-topic, but I wanted to give an example of professional contempt. ================================================== ========== << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Dick Adams wrote: - quote - > An unnamed individual sent me the following criticisms:
(a bunch snipped for brefity.> > I would love to see the end of misc.taxes.moderated in favor > > of this group. Usenet groups focusing on technical issues > > like taxes seem to do pretty well without some self-appointed > > deity deciding which posts get in and which don't. Well, what I think happened is that the OP who criticized, posted his message one day, and expected immediate gratification. IOW, he expected a reply with maybe ... 29 minutes. which just ain't possible. So I would advise said OP to "chill out" (is that the right phrase?), slow down and learn to live a litte. Should I get excited when my replies to those seeking help do not make it on my computer for maybe 72 hours? No. I've got more important things to do than worry about the speed , or lack of it, of the internet. ChEAr$$$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA 11 Apr 2005 4 days and counting...... down.....\ << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| "Dick Adams" <rdadams[at]smart.net> wrote - quote - > I don't recall the submission.
It's already been posted. Probably his "tip" wasn't bigenough to be placed to the front of the line. That, or he's an impatient man. -- Paul A. Thomas, CPA Athens, Georgia taxman at negia.net << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Dick Adams <rdadams[at]smart.net> wrote: - quote - > An unnamed individual sent me the following criticisms:
The fact is that, as Dick says, there is a misc.taxes> > I would love to see the end of misc.taxes.moderated in favor > > of this group. Usenet groups focusing on technical issues > > like taxes seem to do pretty well without some self-appointed > > deity deciding which posts get in and which don't. > Correction: There was an election. However, I was the only > candidate. newsgroup that is not moderated. Go there if you prefer. It's a lot calmer and more pleasant here, in my opinion. - quote - > > For the second time my post to that group did not make it
The post went through. I saw it. I remember thinking,> > - a simple about how to calculate square footage for the > > purposes of taking a home office deduction. I didn't > > cross-post, use curse words, reveal my age, ethnicity, > > heights, weight, hair color or anything else that my > > subject me to the Orwellian vagaries of the > > misc.taxes.moderated chopping tool. I finally gave up > > and went to the IRS. > I don't recall the submission. However, I haven't deleted > anything other than advertising in quite awhile. So your > submission either got posted or it didn't get to me. "what's so hard about using a tape measure?" - quote - > > Of course, the guy who runs that newsgroup has a right to
Dick is extremely liberal in allowing things through. As> > do whatever he wants. However, by running that site, he's > > fragmenting the tax help available on the Usenet. We should > > not subject ourselves to his opinion of what is a good > > question and what's a bad one. Maybe he can simply find > > something else to do, maybe take over for Castro when he > > goes. > I must apologize as it seems I have pissed this person off > by accident and that is something I really try not to do. > I much prefer doing it on purpose. long as they're not spam or blatantly offensive, if tangentially related even if not exactly on topic, he lets just about any claptrap through. ;-) I suppose he subscribes to the notion that there is no such thing as a stupid question. After this I'm not so sure. Stu ================================================== ========== Moderator: Mr. Bronstein: If you ever again use the word "liberal" when referring to me, I will place a curse upon you that your children will marry goyem. ================================================== ========== << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "Dick Adams" <rdadams[at]smart.net> wrote: - quote - > An unnamed individual sent me the following criticisms:
Dick, I asked him to tell us what that post consisted of so> > I would love to see the end of misc.taxes.moderated in favor > > of this group. Usenet groups focusing on technical issues > > like taxes seem to do pretty well without some self-appointed > > deity deciding which posts get in and which don't. > Correction: There was an election. However, I was the only > candidate. > > For the second time my post to that group did not make it > > - a simple about how to calculate square footage for the > > purposes of taking a home office deduction. I didn't > > cross-post, use curse words, reveal my age, ethnicity, > > heights, weight, hair color or anything else that my > > subject me to the Orwellian vagaries of the > > misc.taxes.moderated chopping tool. I finally gave up > > and went to the IRS. > I don't recall the submission. However, I haven't deleted > anything other than advertising in quite awhile. So your > submission either got posted or it didn't get to me. > > Of course, the guy who runs that newsgroup has a right to > > do whatever he wants. However, by running that site, he's > > fragmenting the tax help available on the Usenet. We should > > not subject ourselves to his opinion of what is a good > > question and what's a bad one. Maybe he can simply find > > something else to do, maybe take over for Castro when he > > goes. > I must apologize as it seems I have pissed this person off > by accident and that is something I really try not to do. > I much prefer doing it on purpose. > > Can't we simply stop using that site? I suggest, if you > > post there and here, abandon there. Tell folks you know > > who go there to come here. Let anyone you know who goes > > there that it's time to abandon that exclusive club that > > makes posting difficult, if not impossible!!!!!! > "Orwellian vagaries, take over for Castro, and exclusive > club" - at least I am being criticized by an educated > person. No one has ever talked that way to me except for > my first wife, her mother, and my current mother-in-law. > What I think happened here is "again" that the submission got > posted but did not show up on this gentleman's news server OR > it never got to me. I suspect it was the former. > But there is always misc.taxes where you can learn that you > are no subject to federal taxation for numerous reasons - all > of which will subject you to IRS interest and penalties and > judicial fines. > Have a great day! ![]() that we could all see it for what it was. No response yet. Wayne Brasch, CPA, M. S. Taxation ================================================== ========== Moderator: I did not identify the poster because I considered this to be a misunderstanding. Please do not harrass him or her. This is a professional forum and people often misunderstand. ================================================== ========== << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| - quote - > But there is always misc.taxes where you can learn that you
LOL, I have a friend who has his court date set here in> are no subject to federal taxation for numerous reasons - all > of which will subject you to IRS interest and penalties and > judicial fines. Mpls, MN in early June 05 - suing the IRS for 250 million. Spent a couple years reading tax law at the local librbary and thinks he's got a case. We're all taking the day off to go watch the fun. I'm betting on summary dismissal! - quote - > Have a great day!
any day above ground is a good one !Dave ================================================== ========== Moderator: My money says a Summary Judgement in favor of the IRS and a minimum of a $500 judicial fine. ================================================== ========== << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| An unnamed individual sent me the following criticisms: - quote - > I would love to see the end of misc.taxes.moderated in favor
Correction: There was an election. However, I was the only> of this group. Usenet groups focusing on technical issues > like taxes seem to do pretty well without some self-appointed > deity deciding which posts get in and which don't. candidate. - quote - > For the second time my post to that group did not make it
I don't recall the submission. However, I haven't deleted> - a simple about how to calculate square footage for the > purposes of taking a home office deduction. I didn't > cross-post, use curse words, reveal my age, ethnicity, > heights, weight, hair color or anything else that my > subject me to the Orwellian vagaries of the > misc.taxes.moderated chopping tool. I finally gave up > and went to the IRS. anything other than advertising in quite awhile. So your submission either got posted or it didn't get to me. - quote - > Of course, the guy who runs that newsgroup has a right to
I must apologize as it seems I have pissed this person off> do whatever he wants. However, by running that site, he's > fragmenting the tax help available on the Usenet. We should > not subject ourselves to his opinion of what is a good > question and what's a bad one. Maybe he can simply find > something else to do, maybe take over for Castro when he > goes. by accident and that is something I really try not to do. I much prefer doing it on purpose. - quote - > Can't we simply stop using that site? I suggest, if you
"Orwellian vagaries, take over for Castro, and exclusive> post there and here, abandon there. Tell folks you know > who go there to come here. Let anyone you know who goes > there that it's time to abandon that exclusive club that > makes posting difficult, if not impossible!!!!!! club" - at least I am being criticized by an educated person. No one has ever talked that way to me except for my first wife, her mother, and my current mother-in-law. What I think happened here is "again" that the submission got posted but did not show up on this gentleman's news server OR it never got to me. I suspect it was the former. But there is always misc.taxes where you can learn that you are no subject to federal taxation for numerous reasons - all of which will subject you to IRS interest and penalties and judicial fines. Have a great day! ![]() Dick -- Richard D. Adams, CPA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| email, moderator, received |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Dividends entered before being received. Shorty: I have been trying to balance my UBS investment account. Dividends seem to have been downloaded before actually being paid and in some cases the... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 04-06-2008 10:06 PM | |
| E-mail from Bank One I received today Lori: Below is an e-mail that Bank One (ie FirstUSA) e-mailed me today when I questioned what would happen to MS Money direct downloads as they merged... | Microsoft Money | 4 | 08-06-2005 10:56 PM | |
| Refund received! Shorty: I received a check today from MS for the downloaded version of Money 05 Premium . zztook about 3-4 weeks. | Microsoft Money | 3 | 10-25-2004 12:36 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |